Cargando…
Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have been used as an alternative to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone tissue engineering. However, the efficacy of ASC in bone regeneration in comparison with BMSC remains debatable, since inconsistent results have been reported. Comparing ASC with B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03315-5 |
_version_ | 1783665083670331392 |
---|---|
author | Mohamed-Ahmed, Samih Yassin, Mohammed A. Rashad, Ahmad Espedal, Heidi Idris, Shaza B. Finne-Wistrand, Anna Mustafa, Kamal Vindenes, Hallvard Fristad, Inge |
author_facet | Mohamed-Ahmed, Samih Yassin, Mohammed A. Rashad, Ahmad Espedal, Heidi Idris, Shaza B. Finne-Wistrand, Anna Mustafa, Kamal Vindenes, Hallvard Fristad, Inge |
author_sort | Mohamed-Ahmed, Samih |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have been used as an alternative to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone tissue engineering. However, the efficacy of ASC in bone regeneration in comparison with BMSC remains debatable, since inconsistent results have been reported. Comparing ASC with BMSC obtained from different individuals might contribute to this inconsistency in results. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human ASC and BMSC seeded onto poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using calvarial bone defects in nude rats. First, donor-matched ASC and BMSC were seeded onto the co-polymer scaffolds to evaluate their in vitro osteogenic differentiation. Seeded scaffolds and scaffolds without cells (control) were then implanted in calvarial defects in nude rats. The expression of osteogenesis-related genes was examined after 4 weeks. Cellular activity was investigated after 4 and 12 weeks. Bone formation was evaluated radiographically and histologically after 4, 12, and 24 weeks. In vitro, ASC and BMSC demonstrated mineralization. However, BMSC showed higher alkaline phosphatase activity than ASC. In vivo, human osteogenesis–related genes Runx2 and collagen type I were expressed in defects with scaffold/cells. Defects with scaffold/BMSC had higher cellular activity than defects with scaffold/ASC. Moreover, bone formation in defects with scaffold/BMSC was greater than in defects with scaffold/ASC, especially at the early time-point. These results suggest that although ASC have the potential to regenerate bone, the rate of bone regeneration with ASC may be slower than with BMSC. Accordingly, BMSC are more suitable for bone regenerative applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7960590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79605902021-04-01 Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Mohamed-Ahmed, Samih Yassin, Mohammed A. Rashad, Ahmad Espedal, Heidi Idris, Shaza B. Finne-Wistrand, Anna Mustafa, Kamal Vindenes, Hallvard Fristad, Inge Cell Tissue Res Regular Article Adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have been used as an alternative to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) for bone tissue engineering. However, the efficacy of ASC in bone regeneration in comparison with BMSC remains debatable, since inconsistent results have been reported. Comparing ASC with BMSC obtained from different individuals might contribute to this inconsistency in results. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human ASC and BMSC seeded onto poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using calvarial bone defects in nude rats. First, donor-matched ASC and BMSC were seeded onto the co-polymer scaffolds to evaluate their in vitro osteogenic differentiation. Seeded scaffolds and scaffolds without cells (control) were then implanted in calvarial defects in nude rats. The expression of osteogenesis-related genes was examined after 4 weeks. Cellular activity was investigated after 4 and 12 weeks. Bone formation was evaluated radiographically and histologically after 4, 12, and 24 weeks. In vitro, ASC and BMSC demonstrated mineralization. However, BMSC showed higher alkaline phosphatase activity than ASC. In vivo, human osteogenesis–related genes Runx2 and collagen type I were expressed in defects with scaffold/cells. Defects with scaffold/BMSC had higher cellular activity than defects with scaffold/ASC. Moreover, bone formation in defects with scaffold/BMSC was greater than in defects with scaffold/ASC, especially at the early time-point. These results suggest that although ASC have the potential to regenerate bone, the rate of bone regeneration with ASC may be slower than with BMSC. Accordingly, BMSC are more suitable for bone regenerative applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7960590/ /pubmed/33242173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03315-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Mohamed-Ahmed, Samih Yassin, Mohammed A. Rashad, Ahmad Espedal, Heidi Idris, Shaza B. Finne-Wistrand, Anna Mustafa, Kamal Vindenes, Hallvard Fristad, Inge Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
title | Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
title_full | Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
title_fullStr | Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
title_short | Comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
title_sort | comparison of bone regenerative capacity of donor-matched human adipose–derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03315-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedahmedsamih comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT yassinmohammeda comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT rashadahmad comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT espedalheidi comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT idrisshazab comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT finnewistrandanna comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT mustafakamal comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT vindeneshallvard comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells AT fristadinge comparisonofboneregenerativecapacityofdonormatchedhumanadiposederivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcells |