Cargando…
Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Infertility is a global problem, but only a minority of couples access assisted reproductive technologies due to financial and sociocultural barriers. Complementary and alternative medicine are seen as another option. We aimed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4 |
_version_ | 1783665087724126208 |
---|---|
author | Yogasundram, Hannah M. Hui, Andrew J. O. Sia, Clifford Y. S. Chui, Anthea C. Waldock, William J. Quenby, Siobhan Brown, Elizabeth Oliver-Williams, Clare |
author_facet | Yogasundram, Hannah M. Hui, Andrew J. O. Sia, Clifford Y. S. Chui, Anthea C. Waldock, William J. Quenby, Siobhan Brown, Elizabeth Oliver-Williams, Clare |
author_sort | Yogasundram, Hannah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Infertility is a global problem, but only a minority of couples access assisted reproductive technologies due to financial and sociocultural barriers. Complementary and alternative medicine are seen as another option. We aimed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on conception, miscarriage and live birth rates in couples not receiving assisted reproductive technology treatments. METHODS: The electronic databases EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database were systematically searched before March 24th 2020. Reference lists of eligible studies were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies included trials and observational studies that assessed a complementary or alternative medicine and conception, miscarriage or live births in men or women not undergoing fertility treatment. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a pre-designed data collection form. The study protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018086980). RESULTS: Twenty randomized controlled trials were identified, including 2748 individuals. Most studies did not demonstrate any effect of a complementary or alternative medicine on pregnancy, live birth or miscarriage rates. Limited evidence was found for a positive effect of herbal therapies taken by women on conception rates. There was substantial diversity in quality across the studies. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine on improving the chances of conception and live births, or increasing miscarriage risk. Owing to the generally sub-optimal quality and heterogeneous nature of the evidence, rigorous studies are needed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on fertility. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7960609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79606092021-04-01 Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review Yogasundram, Hannah M. Hui, Andrew J. O. Sia, Clifford Y. S. Chui, Anthea C. Waldock, William J. Quenby, Siobhan Brown, Elizabeth Oliver-Williams, Clare Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine PURPOSE: Infertility is a global problem, but only a minority of couples access assisted reproductive technologies due to financial and sociocultural barriers. Complementary and alternative medicine are seen as another option. We aimed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on conception, miscarriage and live birth rates in couples not receiving assisted reproductive technology treatments. METHODS: The electronic databases EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database were systematically searched before March 24th 2020. Reference lists of eligible studies were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies included trials and observational studies that assessed a complementary or alternative medicine and conception, miscarriage or live births in men or women not undergoing fertility treatment. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a pre-designed data collection form. The study protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018086980). RESULTS: Twenty randomized controlled trials were identified, including 2748 individuals. Most studies did not demonstrate any effect of a complementary or alternative medicine on pregnancy, live birth or miscarriage rates. Limited evidence was found for a positive effect of herbal therapies taken by women on conception rates. There was substantial diversity in quality across the studies. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine on improving the chances of conception and live births, or increasing miscarriage risk. Owing to the generally sub-optimal quality and heterogeneous nature of the evidence, rigorous studies are needed to determine the impact of complementary and alternative medicine on fertility. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7960609/ /pubmed/33083872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine Yogasundram, Hannah M. Hui, Andrew J. O. Sia, Clifford Y. S. Chui, Anthea C. Waldock, William J. Quenby, Siobhan Brown, Elizabeth Oliver-Williams, Clare Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
title | Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
title_full | Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
title_short | Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
title_sort | reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review |
topic | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7960609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05836-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yogasundramhannahm reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT huiandrewjo reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT siacliffordys reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT chuiantheac reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT waldockwilliamj reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT quenbysiobhan reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT brownelizabeth reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview AT oliverwilliamsclare reproductiveoutcomesinwomenandmenusingcomplementaryandalternativemedicinetreatmentandnotreceivingartificialreproductivetechnologyasystematicreview |