Cargando…

The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry (SVOP), an automated eye tracking perimeter, as a tool for visual field (VF) assessment in infants. METHODS: Thirteen healthy infants aged between 3.5 and 12.0 months were tested binocularly using an adapted SVOP protocol....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perperidis, Antonios, McTrusty, Alice D., Cameron, Lorraine A., Murray, Ian C., Brash, Harry M., Fleck, Brian W., Minns, Robert A., Tatham, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.3.14
_version_ 1783665189813485568
author Perperidis, Antonios
McTrusty, Alice D.
Cameron, Lorraine A.
Murray, Ian C.
Brash, Harry M.
Fleck, Brian W.
Minns, Robert A.
Tatham, Andrew J.
author_facet Perperidis, Antonios
McTrusty, Alice D.
Cameron, Lorraine A.
Murray, Ian C.
Brash, Harry M.
Fleck, Brian W.
Minns, Robert A.
Tatham, Andrew J.
author_sort Perperidis, Antonios
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry (SVOP), an automated eye tracking perimeter, as a tool for visual field (VF) assessment in infants. METHODS: Thirteen healthy infants aged between 3.5 and 12.0 months were tested binocularly using an adapted SVOP protocol. SVOP uses eye tracking technology to measure gaze responses to stimuli presented on a computer screen. Modifications of SVOP for testing infants included adjusting the fixation target to display a short animation, increasing the stimulus size to equivalent to Goldmann V, and introducing a tiered test pattern strategy. Binocular, single-quadrant confrontation VF testing and Keeler preferential looking cards visual acuity testing was also performed. RESULTS: Using multiple test attempts when required, all but the youngest infant (12 of 13 [92.3%]) successfully completed a 4-point screening test. Seven infants (53.8%) successfully completed the 12-point test, four (30.8%) successfully completed the 20-point test, and three (23.1%) successfully completed the 40-point test. The effect of multiple test attempts and the complexity of the test pattern (number of test points) on performance was investigated, including test completion rate, percentage of correctly seen stimuli, and average time per tested stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: The modified SVOP test strategy allowed successful assessment of binocular VFs in healthy infants. Future data collection from larger cohorts of infants is needed to derive normative limits of detection and assess accuracy in detecting and monitoring infant VF abnormalities. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Eye tracking perimetry may provide a useful method of automated VF assessment in infants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7961122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79611222021-03-23 The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study Perperidis, Antonios McTrusty, Alice D. Cameron, Lorraine A. Murray, Ian C. Brash, Harry M. Fleck, Brian W. Minns, Robert A. Tatham, Andrew J. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry (SVOP), an automated eye tracking perimeter, as a tool for visual field (VF) assessment in infants. METHODS: Thirteen healthy infants aged between 3.5 and 12.0 months were tested binocularly using an adapted SVOP protocol. SVOP uses eye tracking technology to measure gaze responses to stimuli presented on a computer screen. Modifications of SVOP for testing infants included adjusting the fixation target to display a short animation, increasing the stimulus size to equivalent to Goldmann V, and introducing a tiered test pattern strategy. Binocular, single-quadrant confrontation VF testing and Keeler preferential looking cards visual acuity testing was also performed. RESULTS: Using multiple test attempts when required, all but the youngest infant (12 of 13 [92.3%]) successfully completed a 4-point screening test. Seven infants (53.8%) successfully completed the 12-point test, four (30.8%) successfully completed the 20-point test, and three (23.1%) successfully completed the 40-point test. The effect of multiple test attempts and the complexity of the test pattern (number of test points) on performance was investigated, including test completion rate, percentage of correctly seen stimuli, and average time per tested stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: The modified SVOP test strategy allowed successful assessment of binocular VFs in healthy infants. Future data collection from larger cohorts of infants is needed to derive normative limits of detection and assess accuracy in detecting and monitoring infant VF abnormalities. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Eye tracking perimetry may provide a useful method of automated VF assessment in infants. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7961122/ /pubmed/34003948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.3.14 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Perperidis, Antonios
McTrusty, Alice D.
Cameron, Lorraine A.
Murray, Ian C.
Brash, Harry M.
Fleck, Brian W.
Minns, Robert A.
Tatham, Andrew J.
The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study
title The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study
title_full The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study
title_short The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study
title_sort assessment of visual fields in infants using saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry (svop): a feasibility study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.3.14
work_keys_str_mv AT perperidisantonios theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT mctrustyaliced theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT cameronlorrainea theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT murrayianc theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT brashharrym theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT fleckbrianw theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT minnsroberta theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT tathamandrewj theassessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT perperidisantonios assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT mctrustyaliced assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT cameronlorrainea assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT murrayianc assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT brashharrym assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT fleckbrianw assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT minnsroberta assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy
AT tathamandrewj assessmentofvisualfieldsininfantsusingsaccadicvectoroptokineticperimetrysvopafeasibilitystudy