Cargando…
Arguments about face masks and Covid-19 reflect broader methodologic debates within medical science
There has perhaps been no issue as contentious in Covid-19 as face masks. The most contentious scientific debate has been between those who argue that “there is no scientific evidence”, by which they mean that there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs), versus those who argue that when the evi...
Autores principales: | Pearce, Neil, Vandenbroucke, Jan Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00735-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Principles of argumentation and debate
por: Capp, Glenn R, et al.
Publicado: (1965) -
Monkeypox in the UK: arguments for a broader case definition
por: Pan, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Uniting Infectious Disease and Physical Science Principles on the Importance of Face Masks for COVID-19
por: Gandhi, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The importance of understanding the broader experience of stuttering
por: Herring, Caryn, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician “rationing”
por: Tilburt, Jon C., et al.
Publicado: (2017)