Cargando…

Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF

Certain difficulties in path forecasting and filtering problems are based in the initial hypothesis of estimation and filtering techniques. Common hypotheses include that the system can be modeled as linear, Markovian, Gaussian, or all at one time. Although, in many cases, there are strategies to ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llerena Caña, Juan Pedro, García Herrero, Jesús, Molina López, José Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051805
_version_ 1783665238930882560
author Llerena Caña, Juan Pedro
García Herrero, Jesús
Molina López, José Manuel
author_facet Llerena Caña, Juan Pedro
García Herrero, Jesús
Molina López, José Manuel
author_sort Llerena Caña, Juan Pedro
collection PubMed
description Certain difficulties in path forecasting and filtering problems are based in the initial hypothesis of estimation and filtering techniques. Common hypotheses include that the system can be modeled as linear, Markovian, Gaussian, or all at one time. Although, in many cases, there are strategies to tackle problems with approaches that show very good results, the associated engineering process can become highly complex, requiring a great deal of time or even becoming unapproachable. To have tools to tackle complex problems without starting from a previous hypothesis but to continue to solve classic challenges and sharpen the implementation of estimation and filtering systems is of high scientific interest. This paper addresses the forecast–filter problem from deep learning paradigms with a neural network architecture inspired by natural language processing techniques and data structure. Unlike Kalman, this proposal performs the process of prediction and filtering in the same phase, while Kalman requires two phases. We propose three different study cases of incremental conceptual difficulty. The experimentation is divided into five parts: the standardization effect in raw data, proposal validation, filtering, loss of measurements (forecasting), and, finally, robustness. The results are compared with a Kalman filter, showing that the proposal is comparable in terms of the error within the linear case, with improved performance when facing non-linear systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7961344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79613442021-03-17 Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF Llerena Caña, Juan Pedro García Herrero, Jesús Molina López, José Manuel Sensors (Basel) Article Certain difficulties in path forecasting and filtering problems are based in the initial hypothesis of estimation and filtering techniques. Common hypotheses include that the system can be modeled as linear, Markovian, Gaussian, or all at one time. Although, in many cases, there are strategies to tackle problems with approaches that show very good results, the associated engineering process can become highly complex, requiring a great deal of time or even becoming unapproachable. To have tools to tackle complex problems without starting from a previous hypothesis but to continue to solve classic challenges and sharpen the implementation of estimation and filtering systems is of high scientific interest. This paper addresses the forecast–filter problem from deep learning paradigms with a neural network architecture inspired by natural language processing techniques and data structure. Unlike Kalman, this proposal performs the process of prediction and filtering in the same phase, while Kalman requires two phases. We propose three different study cases of incremental conceptual difficulty. The experimentation is divided into five parts: the standardization effect in raw data, proposal validation, filtering, loss of measurements (forecasting), and, finally, robustness. The results are compared with a Kalman filter, showing that the proposal is comparable in terms of the error within the linear case, with improved performance when facing non-linear systems. MDPI 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7961344/ /pubmed/33807681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051805 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Llerena Caña, Juan Pedro
García Herrero, Jesús
Molina López, José Manuel
Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF
title Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF
title_full Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF
title_fullStr Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF
title_full_unstemmed Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF
title_short Forecasting Nonlinear Systems with LSTM: Analysis and Comparison with EKF
title_sort forecasting nonlinear systems with lstm: analysis and comparison with ekf
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051805
work_keys_str_mv AT llerenacanajuanpedro forecastingnonlinearsystemswithlstmanalysisandcomparisonwithekf
AT garciaherrerojesus forecastingnonlinearsystemswithlstmanalysisandcomparisonwithekf
AT molinalopezjosemanuel forecastingnonlinearsystemswithlstmanalysisandcomparisonwithekf