Cargando…

An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance

The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub-function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Lirong, Wen, Tiantian, Zhang, Jiawen, Chang, Le, Wang, Yi, Liu, Mutian, Ding, Changhao, Yan, Fuwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051763
_version_ 1783665246509989888
author Yan, Lirong
Wen, Tiantian
Zhang, Jiawen
Chang, Le
Wang, Yi
Liu, Mutian
Ding, Changhao
Yan, Fuwu
author_facet Yan, Lirong
Wen, Tiantian
Zhang, Jiawen
Chang, Le
Wang, Yi
Liu, Mutian
Ding, Changhao
Yan, Fuwu
author_sort Yan, Lirong
collection PubMed
description The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub-function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to take part in a simulated driving experiment and a task-cuing experiment. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their driving performance (aberrant driving behaviors, including lapses and errors) by the clustering method. Then the performance efficiency and electroencephalogram (EEG) data acquired in the task-cuing experiment were compared among the three groups. The effect of group, task transition types and cue-stimulus intervals (CSIs) were statistically analyzed by using the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc simple effect analysis. The subjects with lower driving error rates had better executive control efficiency as indicated by the reaction time (RT) and error rate in the task-cuing experiment, which was related with their better capability to allocate the available attentional resources, to express the external stimuli and to process the information in the nervous system, especially the fronto-parietal network. The activation degree of the frontal area fluctuated, and of the parietal area gradually increased along with the increase of CSI, which implied the role of the frontal area in task setting reconstruction and working memory maintaining, and of the parietal area in stimulus–Response (S–R) mapping expression. This research presented evidence of the close relationship between executive control functions and driving performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7961377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79613772021-03-17 An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance Yan, Lirong Wen, Tiantian Zhang, Jiawen Chang, Le Wang, Yi Liu, Mutian Ding, Changhao Yan, Fuwu Sensors (Basel) Article The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub-function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to take part in a simulated driving experiment and a task-cuing experiment. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their driving performance (aberrant driving behaviors, including lapses and errors) by the clustering method. Then the performance efficiency and electroencephalogram (EEG) data acquired in the task-cuing experiment were compared among the three groups. The effect of group, task transition types and cue-stimulus intervals (CSIs) were statistically analyzed by using the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc simple effect analysis. The subjects with lower driving error rates had better executive control efficiency as indicated by the reaction time (RT) and error rate in the task-cuing experiment, which was related with their better capability to allocate the available attentional resources, to express the external stimuli and to process the information in the nervous system, especially the fronto-parietal network. The activation degree of the frontal area fluctuated, and of the parietal area gradually increased along with the increase of CSI, which implied the role of the frontal area in task setting reconstruction and working memory maintaining, and of the parietal area in stimulus–Response (S–R) mapping expression. This research presented evidence of the close relationship between executive control functions and driving performance. MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7961377/ /pubmed/33806358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051763 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yan, Lirong
Wen, Tiantian
Zhang, Jiawen
Chang, Le
Wang, Yi
Liu, Mutian
Ding, Changhao
Yan, Fuwu
An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
title An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
title_full An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
title_short An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
title_sort evaluation of executive control function and its relationship with driving performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051763
work_keys_str_mv AT yanlirong anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT wentiantian anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT zhangjiawen anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT changle anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT wangyi anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT liumutian anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT dingchanghao anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT yanfuwu anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT yanlirong evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT wentiantian evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT zhangjiawen evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT changle evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT wangyi evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT liumutian evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT dingchanghao evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance
AT yanfuwu evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance