Cargando…
An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance
The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub-function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to ta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051763 |
_version_ | 1783665246509989888 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Lirong Wen, Tiantian Zhang, Jiawen Chang, Le Wang, Yi Liu, Mutian Ding, Changhao Yan, Fuwu |
author_facet | Yan, Lirong Wen, Tiantian Zhang, Jiawen Chang, Le Wang, Yi Liu, Mutian Ding, Changhao Yan, Fuwu |
author_sort | Yan, Lirong |
collection | PubMed |
description | The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub-function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to take part in a simulated driving experiment and a task-cuing experiment. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their driving performance (aberrant driving behaviors, including lapses and errors) by the clustering method. Then the performance efficiency and electroencephalogram (EEG) data acquired in the task-cuing experiment were compared among the three groups. The effect of group, task transition types and cue-stimulus intervals (CSIs) were statistically analyzed by using the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc simple effect analysis. The subjects with lower driving error rates had better executive control efficiency as indicated by the reaction time (RT) and error rate in the task-cuing experiment, which was related with their better capability to allocate the available attentional resources, to express the external stimuli and to process the information in the nervous system, especially the fronto-parietal network. The activation degree of the frontal area fluctuated, and of the parietal area gradually increased along with the increase of CSI, which implied the role of the frontal area in task setting reconstruction and working memory maintaining, and of the parietal area in stimulus–Response (S–R) mapping expression. This research presented evidence of the close relationship between executive control functions and driving performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7961377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79613772021-03-17 An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance Yan, Lirong Wen, Tiantian Zhang, Jiawen Chang, Le Wang, Yi Liu, Mutian Ding, Changhao Yan, Fuwu Sensors (Basel) Article The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub-function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to take part in a simulated driving experiment and a task-cuing experiment. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their driving performance (aberrant driving behaviors, including lapses and errors) by the clustering method. Then the performance efficiency and electroencephalogram (EEG) data acquired in the task-cuing experiment were compared among the three groups. The effect of group, task transition types and cue-stimulus intervals (CSIs) were statistically analyzed by using the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc simple effect analysis. The subjects with lower driving error rates had better executive control efficiency as indicated by the reaction time (RT) and error rate in the task-cuing experiment, which was related with their better capability to allocate the available attentional resources, to express the external stimuli and to process the information in the nervous system, especially the fronto-parietal network. The activation degree of the frontal area fluctuated, and of the parietal area gradually increased along with the increase of CSI, which implied the role of the frontal area in task setting reconstruction and working memory maintaining, and of the parietal area in stimulus–Response (S–R) mapping expression. This research presented evidence of the close relationship between executive control functions and driving performance. MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7961377/ /pubmed/33806358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051763 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yan, Lirong Wen, Tiantian Zhang, Jiawen Chang, Le Wang, Yi Liu, Mutian Ding, Changhao Yan, Fuwu An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance |
title | An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance |
title_full | An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance |
title_short | An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance |
title_sort | evaluation of executive control function and its relationship with driving performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanlirong anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT wentiantian anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT zhangjiawen anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT changle anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT wangyi anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT liumutian anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT dingchanghao anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT yanfuwu anevaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT yanlirong evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT wentiantian evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT zhangjiawen evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT changle evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT wangyi evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT liumutian evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT dingchanghao evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance AT yanfuwu evaluationofexecutivecontrolfunctionanditsrelationshipwithdrivingperformance |