Cargando…
Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
The surf pop-up is a unique and challenging skill, critical to successful surfing. Hypothesizing that anthropometric characteristics of surfers influence the pop-up performance, we aimed to measure kinematics and ground-reaction forces (GRF) during a simulated pop-up motion, and to relate these vari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051783 |
_version_ | 1783665259001675776 |
---|---|
author | Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio Telles, Thiago Nessler, Jeff de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi Fernandes, Ricardo J. Vilas-Boas, João Paulo |
author_facet | Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio Telles, Thiago Nessler, Jeff de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi Fernandes, Ricardo J. Vilas-Boas, João Paulo |
author_sort | Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The surf pop-up is a unique and challenging skill, critical to successful surfing. Hypothesizing that anthropometric characteristics of surfers influence the pop-up performance, we aimed to measure kinematics and ground-reaction forces (GRF) during a simulated pop-up motion, and to relate these variables with anthropometric characteristics. Twenty-three male surfers (age: 28.4 ± 10.1 years old; body mass: 68.3 ± 10.8 kg; height: 1.73 ± 0.07 m; time of practice: 12.4 ± 8.9 years; arm-span: 1.75 ± 8.9 m) perform a simulated pop-up in the laboratory, while GRF and 3D motion-capture data were acquired. The duration of the pop-up was 1.20 ± 0.19 s (60% push-up and 40% reaching/landing phase). During the push-up, the hands were placed 0.46 ± 0.05 m apart and generated a relative total peak-force of 0.99 ± 0.10 N/Weight, with symmetrical impulse of 0.30 ± 0.05 N·s/Weight for the dominant and 0.29 ± 0.07 N·s/Weight for the nondominant hand. Elbow angles were not different during the peak force application (110 ± 18° vs. 112 ± 18°, respectively) of the push-up phase. During the landing phase, the feet were placed 0.63 ± 0.10 m apart and generated a relative peak force of 1.63 ± 0.18 N/Weight. The impact force during landing was applied unevenly between the rear foot (28%) and the front foot (72%). In conclusion, most anthropometric-related variables showed no relationship with performance variables, with the exception of an inverse relationship between muscle mass and pop-up total duration. We also observed no differences in upper- and lower-body kinematics between the dominant vs. nondominant hands and among surfers who preferred a regular vs. “goofy-foot” stance. Finally, the force profiles between hands were similar and symmetric, while the lower extremities during the reaching phase were different, with the front foot applying greater force than that of the rear foot. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7961430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79614302021-03-17 Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio Telles, Thiago Nessler, Jeff de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi Fernandes, Ricardo J. Vilas-Boas, João Paulo Sensors (Basel) Article The surf pop-up is a unique and challenging skill, critical to successful surfing. Hypothesizing that anthropometric characteristics of surfers influence the pop-up performance, we aimed to measure kinematics and ground-reaction forces (GRF) during a simulated pop-up motion, and to relate these variables with anthropometric characteristics. Twenty-three male surfers (age: 28.4 ± 10.1 years old; body mass: 68.3 ± 10.8 kg; height: 1.73 ± 0.07 m; time of practice: 12.4 ± 8.9 years; arm-span: 1.75 ± 8.9 m) perform a simulated pop-up in the laboratory, while GRF and 3D motion-capture data were acquired. The duration of the pop-up was 1.20 ± 0.19 s (60% push-up and 40% reaching/landing phase). During the push-up, the hands were placed 0.46 ± 0.05 m apart and generated a relative total peak-force of 0.99 ± 0.10 N/Weight, with symmetrical impulse of 0.30 ± 0.05 N·s/Weight for the dominant and 0.29 ± 0.07 N·s/Weight for the nondominant hand. Elbow angles were not different during the peak force application (110 ± 18° vs. 112 ± 18°, respectively) of the push-up phase. During the landing phase, the feet were placed 0.63 ± 0.10 m apart and generated a relative peak force of 1.63 ± 0.18 N/Weight. The impact force during landing was applied unevenly between the rear foot (28%) and the front foot (72%). In conclusion, most anthropometric-related variables showed no relationship with performance variables, with the exception of an inverse relationship between muscle mass and pop-up total duration. We also observed no differences in upper- and lower-body kinematics between the dominant vs. nondominant hands and among surfers who preferred a regular vs. “goofy-foot” stance. Finally, the force profiles between hands were similar and symmetric, while the lower extremities during the reaching phase were different, with the front foot applying greater force than that of the rear foot. MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7961430/ /pubmed/33806532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051783 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio Telles, Thiago Nessler, Jeff de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi Fernandes, Ricardo J. Vilas-Boas, João Paulo Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? |
title | Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? |
title_full | Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? |
title_fullStr | Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? |
title_short | Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? |
title_sort | are the kinetics and kinematics of the surf pop-up related to the anthropometric characteristics of the surfer? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borgonovosantosmarcio arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer AT tellesthiago arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer AT nesslerjeff arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer AT decastromarcelopeduzzi arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer AT fernandesricardoj arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer AT vilasboasjoaopaulo arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer |