Cargando…

Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?

The surf pop-up is a unique and challenging skill, critical to successful surfing. Hypothesizing that anthropometric characteristics of surfers influence the pop-up performance, we aimed to measure kinematics and ground-reaction forces (GRF) during a simulated pop-up motion, and to relate these vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio, Telles, Thiago, Nessler, Jeff, de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi, Fernandes, Ricardo J., Vilas-Boas, João Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806532
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051783
_version_ 1783665259001675776
author Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio
Telles, Thiago
Nessler, Jeff
de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Vilas-Boas, João Paulo
author_facet Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio
Telles, Thiago
Nessler, Jeff
de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Vilas-Boas, João Paulo
author_sort Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio
collection PubMed
description The surf pop-up is a unique and challenging skill, critical to successful surfing. Hypothesizing that anthropometric characteristics of surfers influence the pop-up performance, we aimed to measure kinematics and ground-reaction forces (GRF) during a simulated pop-up motion, and to relate these variables with anthropometric characteristics. Twenty-three male surfers (age: 28.4 ± 10.1 years old; body mass: 68.3 ± 10.8 kg; height: 1.73 ± 0.07 m; time of practice: 12.4 ± 8.9 years; arm-span: 1.75 ± 8.9 m) perform a simulated pop-up in the laboratory, while GRF and 3D motion-capture data were acquired. The duration of the pop-up was 1.20 ± 0.19 s (60% push-up and 40% reaching/landing phase). During the push-up, the hands were placed 0.46 ± 0.05 m apart and generated a relative total peak-force of 0.99 ± 0.10 N/Weight, with symmetrical impulse of 0.30 ± 0.05 N·s/Weight for the dominant and 0.29 ± 0.07 N·s/Weight for the nondominant hand. Elbow angles were not different during the peak force application (110 ± 18° vs. 112 ± 18°, respectively) of the push-up phase. During the landing phase, the feet were placed 0.63 ± 0.10 m apart and generated a relative peak force of 1.63 ± 0.18 N/Weight. The impact force during landing was applied unevenly between the rear foot (28%) and the front foot (72%). In conclusion, most anthropometric-related variables showed no relationship with performance variables, with the exception of an inverse relationship between muscle mass and pop-up total duration. We also observed no differences in upper- and lower-body kinematics between the dominant vs. nondominant hands and among surfers who preferred a regular vs. “goofy-foot” stance. Finally, the force profiles between hands were similar and symmetric, while the lower extremities during the reaching phase were different, with the front foot applying greater force than that of the rear foot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7961430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79614302021-03-17 Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer? Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio Telles, Thiago Nessler, Jeff de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi Fernandes, Ricardo J. Vilas-Boas, João Paulo Sensors (Basel) Article The surf pop-up is a unique and challenging skill, critical to successful surfing. Hypothesizing that anthropometric characteristics of surfers influence the pop-up performance, we aimed to measure kinematics and ground-reaction forces (GRF) during a simulated pop-up motion, and to relate these variables with anthropometric characteristics. Twenty-three male surfers (age: 28.4 ± 10.1 years old; body mass: 68.3 ± 10.8 kg; height: 1.73 ± 0.07 m; time of practice: 12.4 ± 8.9 years; arm-span: 1.75 ± 8.9 m) perform a simulated pop-up in the laboratory, while GRF and 3D motion-capture data were acquired. The duration of the pop-up was 1.20 ± 0.19 s (60% push-up and 40% reaching/landing phase). During the push-up, the hands were placed 0.46 ± 0.05 m apart and generated a relative total peak-force of 0.99 ± 0.10 N/Weight, with symmetrical impulse of 0.30 ± 0.05 N·s/Weight for the dominant and 0.29 ± 0.07 N·s/Weight for the nondominant hand. Elbow angles were not different during the peak force application (110 ± 18° vs. 112 ± 18°, respectively) of the push-up phase. During the landing phase, the feet were placed 0.63 ± 0.10 m apart and generated a relative peak force of 1.63 ± 0.18 N/Weight. The impact force during landing was applied unevenly between the rear foot (28%) and the front foot (72%). In conclusion, most anthropometric-related variables showed no relationship with performance variables, with the exception of an inverse relationship between muscle mass and pop-up total duration. We also observed no differences in upper- and lower-body kinematics between the dominant vs. nondominant hands and among surfers who preferred a regular vs. “goofy-foot” stance. Finally, the force profiles between hands were similar and symmetric, while the lower extremities during the reaching phase were different, with the front foot applying greater force than that of the rear foot. MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7961430/ /pubmed/33806532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051783 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Borgonovo-Santos, Márcio
Telles, Thiago
Nessler, Jeff
de Castro, Marcelo Peduzzi
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Vilas-Boas, João Paulo
Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
title Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
title_full Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
title_fullStr Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
title_full_unstemmed Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
title_short Are the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Surf Pop-Up Related to the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Surfer?
title_sort are the kinetics and kinematics of the surf pop-up related to the anthropometric characteristics of the surfer?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806532
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051783
work_keys_str_mv AT borgonovosantosmarcio arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer
AT tellesthiago arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer
AT nesslerjeff arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer
AT decastromarcelopeduzzi arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer
AT fernandesricardoj arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer
AT vilasboasjoaopaulo arethekineticsandkinematicsofthesurfpopuprelatedtotheanthropometriccharacteristicsofthesurfer