Cargando…

Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?

Silicon dioxide, in the form of nanoparticles, possesses unique physicochemical properties (size, shape, and a large surface to volume ratio). Therefore, it is one of the most promising materials used in biomedicine. In this paper, we compare the biological effects of both mesoporous silica nanopart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solarska-Ściuk, Katarzyna, Adach, Kinga, Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, Sylwia, Bonarska-Kujawa, Dorota, Rusak, Agnieszka, Cwynar-Zając, Łucja, Machałowski, Tomasz, Jesionowski, Teofil, Grzywacz, Katarzyna, Fijałkowski, Mateusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051427
_version_ 1783665371747713024
author Solarska-Ściuk, Katarzyna
Adach, Kinga
Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, Sylwia
Bonarska-Kujawa, Dorota
Rusak, Agnieszka
Cwynar-Zając, Łucja
Machałowski, Tomasz
Jesionowski, Teofil
Grzywacz, Katarzyna
Fijałkowski, Mateusz
author_facet Solarska-Ściuk, Katarzyna
Adach, Kinga
Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, Sylwia
Bonarska-Kujawa, Dorota
Rusak, Agnieszka
Cwynar-Zając, Łucja
Machałowski, Tomasz
Jesionowski, Teofil
Grzywacz, Katarzyna
Fijałkowski, Mateusz
author_sort Solarska-Ściuk, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description Silicon dioxide, in the form of nanoparticles, possesses unique physicochemical properties (size, shape, and a large surface to volume ratio). Therefore, it is one of the most promising materials used in biomedicine. In this paper, we compare the biological effects of both mesoporous silica nanoparticles extracted from Urtica dioica L. and pyrogenic material. Both SEM and TEM investigations confirmed the size range of tested nanoparticles was between 6 and 20 nanometers and their amorphous structure. The cytotoxic activity of the compounds and intracellular ROS were determined in relation to cells HMEC-1 and erythrocytes. The cytotoxic effects of SiO(2) NPs were determined after exposure to different concentrations and three periods of incubation. The same effects for endothelial cells were tested under the same range of concentrations but after 2 and 24 h of exposure to erythrocytes. The cell viability was measured using spectrophotometric and fluorimetric assays, and the impact of the nanoparticles on the level of intracellular ROS. The obtained results indicated that bioSiO(2) NPs, present higher toxicity than pyrogenic NPs and have a higher influence on ROS production. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles show good hemocompatibility but after a 24 h incubation of erythrocytes with silica, the increase in hemolysis process, the decrease in osmotic resistance of red blood cells, and shape of erythrocytes changed were observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7961954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79619542021-03-17 Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells? Solarska-Ściuk, Katarzyna Adach, Kinga Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, Sylwia Bonarska-Kujawa, Dorota Rusak, Agnieszka Cwynar-Zając, Łucja Machałowski, Tomasz Jesionowski, Teofil Grzywacz, Katarzyna Fijałkowski, Mateusz Molecules Article Silicon dioxide, in the form of nanoparticles, possesses unique physicochemical properties (size, shape, and a large surface to volume ratio). Therefore, it is one of the most promising materials used in biomedicine. In this paper, we compare the biological effects of both mesoporous silica nanoparticles extracted from Urtica dioica L. and pyrogenic material. Both SEM and TEM investigations confirmed the size range of tested nanoparticles was between 6 and 20 nanometers and their amorphous structure. The cytotoxic activity of the compounds and intracellular ROS were determined in relation to cells HMEC-1 and erythrocytes. The cytotoxic effects of SiO(2) NPs were determined after exposure to different concentrations and three periods of incubation. The same effects for endothelial cells were tested under the same range of concentrations but after 2 and 24 h of exposure to erythrocytes. The cell viability was measured using spectrophotometric and fluorimetric assays, and the impact of the nanoparticles on the level of intracellular ROS. The obtained results indicated that bioSiO(2) NPs, present higher toxicity than pyrogenic NPs and have a higher influence on ROS production. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles show good hemocompatibility but after a 24 h incubation of erythrocytes with silica, the increase in hemolysis process, the decrease in osmotic resistance of red blood cells, and shape of erythrocytes changed were observed. MDPI 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7961954/ /pubmed/33800774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051427 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Solarska-Ściuk, Katarzyna
Adach, Kinga
Cyboran-Mikołajczyk, Sylwia
Bonarska-Kujawa, Dorota
Rusak, Agnieszka
Cwynar-Zając, Łucja
Machałowski, Tomasz
Jesionowski, Teofil
Grzywacz, Katarzyna
Fijałkowski, Mateusz
Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?
title Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?
title_full Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?
title_fullStr Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?
title_full_unstemmed Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?
title_short Are Biogenic and Pyrogenic Mesoporous SiO(2) Nanoparticles Safe for Normal Cells?
title_sort are biogenic and pyrogenic mesoporous sio(2) nanoparticles safe for normal cells?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051427
work_keys_str_mv AT solarskasciukkatarzyna arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT adachkinga arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT cyboranmikołajczyksylwia arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT bonarskakujawadorota arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT rusakagnieszka arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT cwynarzajacłucja arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT machałowskitomasz arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT jesionowskiteofil arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT grzywaczkatarzyna arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells
AT fijałkowskimateusz arebiogenicandpyrogenicmesoporoussio2nanoparticlessafefornormalcells