Cargando…
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33715632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00728-1 |
_version_ | 1783665446484967424 |
---|---|
author | Gatterer, Constantin Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth Kammerlander, Andreas Zuckermann, Andreas Krššák, Martin Loewe, Christian Beitzke, Dietrich |
author_facet | Gatterer, Constantin Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth Kammerlander, Andreas Zuckermann, Andreas Krššák, Martin Loewe, Christian Beitzke, Dietrich |
author_sort | Gatterer, Constantin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the future. Therefore, we aimed to provide data about safety and image quality of CMR in these patients. METHODS: This is a report on a subpopulation out of 88 patients after heart transplantation that were included in a prospective cohort study and underwent multiple CMR in their post-transplant course. During CMR, patients were monitored by electrocardiogram and all examinations were observed by a physician to document potential adverse events. Additionally, image quality was assessed by an imaging specialist. RESULTS: Nineteen of 88 patients included had temporary pacing wires in situ. These patients underwent a total of 51 CMR studies. No major adverse event and only one single, mild sensory event could be documented. All CMR studies showed preserved diagnostic image quality. Temporary pacing wires were visible in 100% of HASTE and cine sequences. In less than 50% of the examinations, temporary pacing wires were also visible in T1 and T2 mapping, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, without any impairment of image quality. CONCLUSIONS: With a low event rate of only one mild adverse event during 51 CMR examinations (2%), CMR appears to be safe in patients with retained temporary epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation. Moreover, image quality was not impaired by the presence of pacing wires. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7962314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79623142021-03-16 Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation Gatterer, Constantin Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth Kammerlander, Andreas Zuckermann, Andreas Krššák, Martin Loewe, Christian Beitzke, Dietrich J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the future. Therefore, we aimed to provide data about safety and image quality of CMR in these patients. METHODS: This is a report on a subpopulation out of 88 patients after heart transplantation that were included in a prospective cohort study and underwent multiple CMR in their post-transplant course. During CMR, patients were monitored by electrocardiogram and all examinations were observed by a physician to document potential adverse events. Additionally, image quality was assessed by an imaging specialist. RESULTS: Nineteen of 88 patients included had temporary pacing wires in situ. These patients underwent a total of 51 CMR studies. No major adverse event and only one single, mild sensory event could be documented. All CMR studies showed preserved diagnostic image quality. Temporary pacing wires were visible in 100% of HASTE and cine sequences. In less than 50% of the examinations, temporary pacing wires were also visible in T1 and T2 mapping, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, without any impairment of image quality. CONCLUSIONS: With a low event rate of only one mild adverse event during 51 CMR examinations (2%), CMR appears to be safe in patients with retained temporary epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation. Moreover, image quality was not impaired by the presence of pacing wires. BioMed Central 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7962314/ /pubmed/33715632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00728-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gatterer, Constantin Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth Kammerlander, Andreas Zuckermann, Andreas Krššák, Martin Loewe, Christian Beitzke, Dietrich Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
title |
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
title_full |
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
title_fullStr |
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
title_short |
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
title_sort | safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33715632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00728-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gattererconstantin safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation AT stelzmullermarieelisabeth safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation AT kammerlanderandreas safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation AT zuckermannandreas safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation AT krssakmartin safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation AT loewechristian safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation AT beitzkedietrich safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation |