Cargando…

Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gatterer, Constantin, Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth, Kammerlander, Andreas, Zuckermann, Andreas, Krššák, Martin, Loewe, Christian, Beitzke, Dietrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33715632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00728-1
_version_ 1783665446484967424
author Gatterer, Constantin
Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth
Kammerlander, Andreas
Zuckermann, Andreas
Krššák, Martin
Loewe, Christian
Beitzke, Dietrich
author_facet Gatterer, Constantin
Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth
Kammerlander, Andreas
Zuckermann, Andreas
Krššák, Martin
Loewe, Christian
Beitzke, Dietrich
author_sort Gatterer, Constantin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the future. Therefore, we aimed to provide data about safety and image quality of CMR in these patients. METHODS: This is a report on a subpopulation out of 88 patients after heart transplantation that were included in a prospective cohort study and underwent multiple CMR in their post-transplant course. During CMR, patients were monitored by electrocardiogram and all examinations were observed by a physician to document potential adverse events. Additionally, image quality was assessed by an imaging specialist. RESULTS: Nineteen of 88 patients included had temporary pacing wires in situ. These patients underwent a total of 51 CMR studies. No major adverse event and only one single, mild sensory event could be documented. All CMR studies showed preserved diagnostic image quality. Temporary pacing wires were visible in 100% of HASTE and cine sequences. In less than 50% of the examinations, temporary pacing wires were also visible in T1 and T2 mapping, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, without any impairment of image quality. CONCLUSIONS: With a low event rate of only one mild adverse event during 51 CMR examinations (2%), CMR appears to be safe in patients with retained temporary epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation. Moreover, image quality was not impaired by the presence of pacing wires.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7962314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79623142021-03-16 Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation Gatterer, Constantin Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth Kammerlander, Andreas Zuckermann, Andreas Krššák, Martin Loewe, Christian Beitzke, Dietrich J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires, implemented in patients during heart transplantation, are routinely removed before discharge. However, in some cases, these wires may remain in situ and are often considered as a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the future. Therefore, we aimed to provide data about safety and image quality of CMR in these patients. METHODS: This is a report on a subpopulation out of 88 patients after heart transplantation that were included in a prospective cohort study and underwent multiple CMR in their post-transplant course. During CMR, patients were monitored by electrocardiogram and all examinations were observed by a physician to document potential adverse events. Additionally, image quality was assessed by an imaging specialist. RESULTS: Nineteen of 88 patients included had temporary pacing wires in situ. These patients underwent a total of 51 CMR studies. No major adverse event and only one single, mild sensory event could be documented. All CMR studies showed preserved diagnostic image quality. Temporary pacing wires were visible in 100% of HASTE and cine sequences. In less than 50% of the examinations, temporary pacing wires were also visible in T1 and T2 mapping, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, without any impairment of image quality. CONCLUSIONS: With a low event rate of only one mild adverse event during 51 CMR examinations (2%), CMR appears to be safe in patients with retained temporary epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation. Moreover, image quality was not impaired by the presence of pacing wires. BioMed Central 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7962314/ /pubmed/33715632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00728-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gatterer, Constantin
Stelzmüller, Marie-Elisabeth
Kammerlander, Andreas
Zuckermann, Andreas
Krššák, Martin
Loewe, Christian
Beitzke, Dietrich
Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
title Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
title_full Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
title_fullStr Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
title_short Safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
title_sort safety and image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacing wires after heart transplantation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33715632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00728-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gattererconstantin safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation
AT stelzmullermarieelisabeth safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation
AT kammerlanderandreas safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation
AT zuckermannandreas safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation
AT krssakmartin safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation
AT loewechristian safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation
AT beitzkedietrich safetyandimagequalityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithretainedepicardialpacingwiresafterhearttransplantation