Cargando…

When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping

BACKGROUND: Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sailer, Sabrina, Coassin, Stefan, Lackner, Katharina, Fischer, Caroline, McNeill, Eileen, Streiter, Gertraud, Kremser, Christian, Maglione, Manuel, Green, Catherine M., Moralli, Daniela, Moschen, Alexander R., Keller, Markus A., Golderer, Georg, Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele, Tegeder, Irmgard, Channon, Keith M., Davies, Benjamin, Werner, Ernst R., Watschinger, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00566-9
_version_ 1783665457054613504
author Sailer, Sabrina
Coassin, Stefan
Lackner, Katharina
Fischer, Caroline
McNeill, Eileen
Streiter, Gertraud
Kremser, Christian
Maglione, Manuel
Green, Catherine M.
Moralli, Daniela
Moschen, Alexander R.
Keller, Markus A.
Golderer, Georg
Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele
Tegeder, Irmgard
Channon, Keith M.
Davies, Benjamin
Werner, Ernst R.
Watschinger, Katrin
author_facet Sailer, Sabrina
Coassin, Stefan
Lackner, Katharina
Fischer, Caroline
McNeill, Eileen
Streiter, Gertraud
Kremser, Christian
Maglione, Manuel
Green, Catherine M.
Moralli, Daniela
Moschen, Alexander R.
Keller, Markus A.
Golderer, Georg
Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele
Tegeder, Irmgard
Channon, Keith M.
Davies, Benjamin
Werner, Ernst R.
Watschinger, Katrin
author_sort Sailer, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. RESULTS: We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. CONCLUSIONS: A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7962373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79623732021-03-16 When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping Sailer, Sabrina Coassin, Stefan Lackner, Katharina Fischer, Caroline McNeill, Eileen Streiter, Gertraud Kremser, Christian Maglione, Manuel Green, Catherine M. Moralli, Daniela Moschen, Alexander R. Keller, Markus A. Golderer, Georg Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele Tegeder, Irmgard Channon, Keith M. Davies, Benjamin Werner, Ernst R. Watschinger, Katrin Cell Biosci Research BACKGROUND: Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. RESULTS: We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. CONCLUSIONS: A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms. BioMed Central 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7962373/ /pubmed/33726865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00566-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sailer, Sabrina
Coassin, Stefan
Lackner, Katharina
Fischer, Caroline
McNeill, Eileen
Streiter, Gertraud
Kremser, Christian
Maglione, Manuel
Green, Catherine M.
Moralli, Daniela
Moschen, Alexander R.
Keller, Markus A.
Golderer, Georg
Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele
Tegeder, Irmgard
Channon, Keith M.
Davies, Benjamin
Werner, Ernst R.
Watschinger, Katrin
When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_full When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_fullStr When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_full_unstemmed When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_short When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
title_sort when the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00566-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sailersabrina whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT coassinstefan whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT lacknerkatharina whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT fischercaroline whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT mcneilleileen whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT streitergertraud whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT kremserchristian whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT maglionemanuel whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT greencatherinem whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT morallidaniela whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT moschenalexanderr whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT kellermarkusa whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT golderergeorg whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT wernerfelmayergabriele whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT tegederirmgard whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT channonkeithm whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT daviesbenjamin whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT wernerernstr whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping
AT watschingerkatrin whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping