Cargando…
When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping
BACKGROUND: Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00566-9 |
_version_ | 1783665457054613504 |
---|---|
author | Sailer, Sabrina Coassin, Stefan Lackner, Katharina Fischer, Caroline McNeill, Eileen Streiter, Gertraud Kremser, Christian Maglione, Manuel Green, Catherine M. Moralli, Daniela Moschen, Alexander R. Keller, Markus A. Golderer, Georg Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele Tegeder, Irmgard Channon, Keith M. Davies, Benjamin Werner, Ernst R. Watschinger, Katrin |
author_facet | Sailer, Sabrina Coassin, Stefan Lackner, Katharina Fischer, Caroline McNeill, Eileen Streiter, Gertraud Kremser, Christian Maglione, Manuel Green, Catherine M. Moralli, Daniela Moschen, Alexander R. Keller, Markus A. Golderer, Georg Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele Tegeder, Irmgard Channon, Keith M. Davies, Benjamin Werner, Ernst R. Watschinger, Katrin |
author_sort | Sailer, Sabrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. RESULTS: We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. CONCLUSIONS: A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7962373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79623732021-03-16 When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping Sailer, Sabrina Coassin, Stefan Lackner, Katharina Fischer, Caroline McNeill, Eileen Streiter, Gertraud Kremser, Christian Maglione, Manuel Green, Catherine M. Moralli, Daniela Moschen, Alexander R. Keller, Markus A. Golderer, Georg Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele Tegeder, Irmgard Channon, Keith M. Davies, Benjamin Werner, Ernst R. Watschinger, Katrin Cell Biosci Research BACKGROUND: Genome editing in mice using either classical approaches like homologous recombination or CRISPR/Cas9 has been reported to harbor off target effects (insertion/deletion, frame shifts or gene segment duplications) that lead to mutations not only in close proximity to the target site but also outside. Only the genomes of few engineered mouse strains have been sequenced. Since the role of the ether-lipid cleaving enzyme alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) in physiology and pathophysiology remains enigmatic, we created a knockout mouse model for AGMO using EUCOMM stem cells but unforeseen genotyping issues that did not agree with Mendelian distribution and enzyme activity data prompted an in-depth genomic validation of the mouse model. RESULTS: We report a gene segment tandem duplication event that occurred during the generation of an Agmo knockout-first allele by homologous recombination. Only low homology was seen between the breakpoints. While a single copy of the recombinant 18 kb cassette was integrated correctly around exon 2 of the Agmo gene, whole genome nanopore sequencing revealed a 94 kb duplication in the Agmo locus that contains Agmo wild-type exons 1–3. The duplication fooled genotyping by routine PCR, but could be resolved using qPCR-based genotyping, targeted locus amplification sequencing and nanopore sequencing. Despite this event, this Agmo knockout mouse model lacks AGMO enzyme activity and can therefore be used to study its physiological role. CONCLUSIONS: A duplication event occurred at the exact locus of the homologous recombination and was not detected by conventional quality control filters such as FISH or long-range PCR over the recombination sites. Nanopore sequencing provides a cost convenient method to detect such underrated off-target effects, suggesting its use for additional quality assessment of gene editing in mice and also other model organisms. BioMed Central 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7962373/ /pubmed/33726865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00566-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sailer, Sabrina Coassin, Stefan Lackner, Katharina Fischer, Caroline McNeill, Eileen Streiter, Gertraud Kremser, Christian Maglione, Manuel Green, Catherine M. Moralli, Daniela Moschen, Alexander R. Keller, Markus A. Golderer, Georg Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele Tegeder, Irmgard Channon, Keith M. Davies, Benjamin Werner, Ernst R. Watschinger, Katrin When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
title | When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
title_full | When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
title_fullStr | When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
title_short | When the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel Agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
title_sort | when the genome bluffs: a tandem duplication event during generation of a novel agmo knockout mouse model fools routine genotyping |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00566-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sailersabrina whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT coassinstefan whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT lacknerkatharina whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT fischercaroline whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT mcneilleileen whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT streitergertraud whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT kremserchristian whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT maglionemanuel whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT greencatherinem whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT morallidaniela whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT moschenalexanderr whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT kellermarkusa whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT golderergeorg whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT wernerfelmayergabriele whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT tegederirmgard whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT channonkeithm whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT daviesbenjamin whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT wernerernstr whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping AT watschingerkatrin whenthegenomebluffsatandemduplicationeventduringgenerationofanovelagmoknockoutmousemodelfoolsroutinegenotyping |