Cargando…
Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The targeted approach adopted for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) screening is sub-optimal considering the large proportion of BO cases that are currently missed. We reviewed the literature highlighting recent technological advancements in efforts to counteract this challenge. We also p...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-021-00342-1 |
_version_ | 1783665466951073792 |
---|---|
author | Yusuf, Aisha Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. |
author_facet | Yusuf, Aisha Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. |
author_sort | Yusuf, Aisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The targeted approach adopted for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) screening is sub-optimal considering the large proportion of BO cases that are currently missed. We reviewed the literature highlighting recent technological advancements in efforts to counteract this challenge. We also provided insights into strategies that can improve the outcomes from current BO screening practises. RECENT FINDINGS: The standard method for BO detection, endoscopy, is invasive and expensive and therefore inappropriate for mass screening. On the other hand, endoscopy is more cost-effective for screening a high-risk population. A consensus has however not been reached on who should be screened. Risk prediction algorithms have been tested as an enrichment pre-screening tool reporting modest AUC’s but require more prospective evaluation studies. Less invasive endoscopy methods like trans-nasal endoscopy, oesophageal capsule endsocopy and non-endoscopic cell collection devices like the Cytosponge coupled with biomarker analysis have shown promise in BO detection with randomised clinical trial evidence. SUMMARY: A three-tier precision cancer programme whereby risk prediction algorithms and non-endoscopic minimally invasive cell collection devices are used to triage test a wider pool of individuals may improve the detection rate of current screening practises with minimal cost implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7962426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79624262021-03-16 Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? Yusuf, Aisha Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The targeted approach adopted for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) screening is sub-optimal considering the large proportion of BO cases that are currently missed. We reviewed the literature highlighting recent technological advancements in efforts to counteract this challenge. We also provided insights into strategies that can improve the outcomes from current BO screening practises. RECENT FINDINGS: The standard method for BO detection, endoscopy, is invasive and expensive and therefore inappropriate for mass screening. On the other hand, endoscopy is more cost-effective for screening a high-risk population. A consensus has however not been reached on who should be screened. Risk prediction algorithms have been tested as an enrichment pre-screening tool reporting modest AUC’s but require more prospective evaluation studies. Less invasive endoscopy methods like trans-nasal endoscopy, oesophageal capsule endsocopy and non-endoscopic cell collection devices like the Cytosponge coupled with biomarker analysis have shown promise in BO detection with randomised clinical trial evidence. SUMMARY: A three-tier precision cancer programme whereby risk prediction algorithms and non-endoscopic minimally invasive cell collection devices are used to triage test a wider pool of individuals may improve the detection rate of current screening practises with minimal cost implications. Springer US 2021-03-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7962426/ /pubmed/33746508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-021-00342-1 Text en © Crown 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) Yusuf, Aisha Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? |
title | Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? |
title_full | Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? |
title_fullStr | Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? |
title_short | Screening for Barrett’s Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it? |
title_sort | screening for barrett’s oesophagus: are we ready for it? |
topic | Endoscopy (P Siersema, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-021-00342-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yusufaisha screeningforbarrettsoesophagusarewereadyforit AT fitzgeraldrebeccac screeningforbarrettsoesophagusarewereadyforit |