Cargando…

The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings

The present eye-tracking study investigated how audio explanations influence perception and the cognitive processing of historical paintings. Spatially close and distant pairs of picture elements and their semantic relations were named in an audio text either immediately after each other or with des...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glaser, Manuela, Knoos, Manuel, Schwan, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828787
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.11
_version_ 1783665520832151552
author Glaser, Manuela
Knoos, Manuel
Schwan, Stephan
author_facet Glaser, Manuela
Knoos, Manuel
Schwan, Stephan
author_sort Glaser, Manuela
collection PubMed
description The present eye-tracking study investigated how audio explanations influence perception and the cognitive processing of historical paintings. Spatially close and distant pairs of picture elements and their semantic relations were named in an audio text either immediately after each other or with descriptions of other elements in between. It was assumed that the number of backward fixation counts on the first of the two mentioned related picture elements should be higher if they are spatially close rather than spatially distant. There should also be more backward fixation counts if the elements are named temporally close rather than temporally distant. Similar predictions were made for the retention of these picture elements and their relations. A 2x2x2 within-subject design (n=36) with spatial distance (close vs. distant), temporal distance (close vs. distant) and painting (Leutze vs. West) revealed more background fixation counts for spatially close compared to spatially distant elements but just for the Leutze painting. Accordingly, the relations between the spatially close pairs were retained better than between the spatially distant pairs in the Leutze painting but vice versa for the West painting. The results are discussed with regard to the spatial contiguity principle of multimedia learning and research on text coherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7962784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79627842021-04-06 The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings Glaser, Manuela Knoos, Manuel Schwan, Stephan J Eye Mov Res Research Article The present eye-tracking study investigated how audio explanations influence perception and the cognitive processing of historical paintings. Spatially close and distant pairs of picture elements and their semantic relations were named in an audio text either immediately after each other or with descriptions of other elements in between. It was assumed that the number of backward fixation counts on the first of the two mentioned related picture elements should be higher if they are spatially close rather than spatially distant. There should also be more backward fixation counts if the elements are named temporally close rather than temporally distant. Similar predictions were made for the retention of these picture elements and their relations. A 2x2x2 within-subject design (n=36) with spatial distance (close vs. distant), temporal distance (close vs. distant) and painting (Leutze vs. West) revealed more background fixation counts for spatially close compared to spatially distant elements but just for the Leutze painting. Accordingly, the relations between the spatially close pairs were retained better than between the spatially distant pairs in the Leutze painting but vice versa for the West painting. The results are discussed with regard to the spatial contiguity principle of multimedia learning and research on text coherence. Bern Open Publishing 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7962784/ /pubmed/33828787 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.11 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glaser, Manuela
Knoos, Manuel
Schwan, Stephan
The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings
title The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings
title_full The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings
title_fullStr The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings
title_full_unstemmed The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings
title_short The Closer, The Better? Processing Relations Between Picture Elements in Historical Paintings
title_sort closer, the better? processing relations between picture elements in historical paintings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828787
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.11
work_keys_str_mv AT glasermanuela thecloserthebetterprocessingrelationsbetweenpictureelementsinhistoricalpaintings
AT knoosmanuel thecloserthebetterprocessingrelationsbetweenpictureelementsinhistoricalpaintings
AT schwanstephan thecloserthebetterprocessingrelationsbetweenpictureelementsinhistoricalpaintings
AT glasermanuela closerthebetterprocessingrelationsbetweenpictureelementsinhistoricalpaintings
AT knoosmanuel closerthebetterprocessingrelationsbetweenpictureelementsinhistoricalpaintings
AT schwanstephan closerthebetterprocessingrelationsbetweenpictureelementsinhistoricalpaintings