Cargando…
Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
Near Infrared (800–2500 nm) spectroscopy has been extensively used in biomedical applications, as it offers rapid, in vivo, bed-side monitoring of important haemodynamic parameters, which is especially important in critical care settings. However, the choice of NIR spectrometer needs to be investiga...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051891 |
_version_ | 1783665528567496704 |
---|---|
author | Baishya, Nystha Mamouei, Mohammad Budidha, Karthik Qassem, Meha Vadgama, Pankaj Kyriacou, Panayiotis A. |
author_facet | Baishya, Nystha Mamouei, Mohammad Budidha, Karthik Qassem, Meha Vadgama, Pankaj Kyriacou, Panayiotis A. |
author_sort | Baishya, Nystha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Near Infrared (800–2500 nm) spectroscopy has been extensively used in biomedical applications, as it offers rapid, in vivo, bed-side monitoring of important haemodynamic parameters, which is especially important in critical care settings. However, the choice of NIR spectrometer needs to be investigated for biomedical applications, as both the dual beam dispersive spectrophotomer and the FTNIR spectrometer have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, predictive analysis of lactate concentrations in whole blood were undertaken using multivariate techniques on spectra obtained from the two spectrometer types simultaneously and results were compared. Results showed significant improvement in predicting analyte concentration when analysis was performed on full range spectral data. This is in comparison to analysis of limited spectral regions or lactate signature peaks, which yielded poorer prediction models. Furthermore, for the same region, FTNIR showed 10% better predictive capability than the dual beam dispersive NIR spectrometer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7962825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79628252021-03-17 Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection Baishya, Nystha Mamouei, Mohammad Budidha, Karthik Qassem, Meha Vadgama, Pankaj Kyriacou, Panayiotis A. Sensors (Basel) Communication Near Infrared (800–2500 nm) spectroscopy has been extensively used in biomedical applications, as it offers rapid, in vivo, bed-side monitoring of important haemodynamic parameters, which is especially important in critical care settings. However, the choice of NIR spectrometer needs to be investigated for biomedical applications, as both the dual beam dispersive spectrophotomer and the FTNIR spectrometer have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, predictive analysis of lactate concentrations in whole blood were undertaken using multivariate techniques on spectra obtained from the two spectrometer types simultaneously and results were compared. Results showed significant improvement in predicting analyte concentration when analysis was performed on full range spectral data. This is in comparison to analysis of limited spectral regions or lactate signature peaks, which yielded poorer prediction models. Furthermore, for the same region, FTNIR showed 10% better predictive capability than the dual beam dispersive NIR spectrometer. MDPI 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7962825/ /pubmed/33800350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051891 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Baishya, Nystha Mamouei, Mohammad Budidha, Karthik Qassem, Meha Vadgama, Pankaj Kyriacou, Panayiotis A. Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection |
title | Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection |
title_full | Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection |
title_short | Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection |
title_sort | comparison of dual beam dispersive and ftnir spectroscopy for lactate detection |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051891 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baishyanystha comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection AT mamoueimohammad comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection AT budidhakarthik comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection AT qassemmeha comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection AT vadgamapankaj comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection AT kyriacoupanayiotisa comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection |