Cargando…

Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection

Near Infrared (800–2500 nm) spectroscopy has been extensively used in biomedical applications, as it offers rapid, in vivo, bed-side monitoring of important haemodynamic parameters, which is especially important in critical care settings. However, the choice of NIR spectrometer needs to be investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baishya, Nystha, Mamouei, Mohammad, Budidha, Karthik, Qassem, Meha, Vadgama, Pankaj, Kyriacou, Panayiotis A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051891
_version_ 1783665528567496704
author Baishya, Nystha
Mamouei, Mohammad
Budidha, Karthik
Qassem, Meha
Vadgama, Pankaj
Kyriacou, Panayiotis A.
author_facet Baishya, Nystha
Mamouei, Mohammad
Budidha, Karthik
Qassem, Meha
Vadgama, Pankaj
Kyriacou, Panayiotis A.
author_sort Baishya, Nystha
collection PubMed
description Near Infrared (800–2500 nm) spectroscopy has been extensively used in biomedical applications, as it offers rapid, in vivo, bed-side monitoring of important haemodynamic parameters, which is especially important in critical care settings. However, the choice of NIR spectrometer needs to be investigated for biomedical applications, as both the dual beam dispersive spectrophotomer and the FTNIR spectrometer have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, predictive analysis of lactate concentrations in whole blood were undertaken using multivariate techniques on spectra obtained from the two spectrometer types simultaneously and results were compared. Results showed significant improvement in predicting analyte concentration when analysis was performed on full range spectral data. This is in comparison to analysis of limited spectral regions or lactate signature peaks, which yielded poorer prediction models. Furthermore, for the same region, FTNIR showed 10% better predictive capability than the dual beam dispersive NIR spectrometer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7962825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79628252021-03-17 Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection Baishya, Nystha Mamouei, Mohammad Budidha, Karthik Qassem, Meha Vadgama, Pankaj Kyriacou, Panayiotis A. Sensors (Basel) Communication Near Infrared (800–2500 nm) spectroscopy has been extensively used in biomedical applications, as it offers rapid, in vivo, bed-side monitoring of important haemodynamic parameters, which is especially important in critical care settings. However, the choice of NIR spectrometer needs to be investigated for biomedical applications, as both the dual beam dispersive spectrophotomer and the FTNIR spectrometer have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this study, predictive analysis of lactate concentrations in whole blood were undertaken using multivariate techniques on spectra obtained from the two spectrometer types simultaneously and results were compared. Results showed significant improvement in predicting analyte concentration when analysis was performed on full range spectral data. This is in comparison to analysis of limited spectral regions or lactate signature peaks, which yielded poorer prediction models. Furthermore, for the same region, FTNIR showed 10% better predictive capability than the dual beam dispersive NIR spectrometer. MDPI 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7962825/ /pubmed/33800350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051891 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Baishya, Nystha
Mamouei, Mohammad
Budidha, Karthik
Qassem, Meha
Vadgama, Pankaj
Kyriacou, Panayiotis A.
Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
title Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
title_full Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
title_fullStr Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
title_short Comparison of Dual Beam Dispersive and FTNIR Spectroscopy for Lactate Detection
title_sort comparison of dual beam dispersive and ftnir spectroscopy for lactate detection
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21051891
work_keys_str_mv AT baishyanystha comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection
AT mamoueimohammad comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection
AT budidhakarthik comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection
AT qassemmeha comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection
AT vadgamapankaj comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection
AT kyriacoupanayiotisa comparisonofdualbeamdispersiveandftnirspectroscopyforlactatedetection