Cargando…

Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies

We conducted a search for international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. We found 25 resources from 13 countries/regions and extracted information related to general screening as well as screening related to specific monochorionic complications, inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholas, Lauren, Fischbein, Rebecca, Ernst-Milner, Stephanie, Wani, Roshni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051128
_version_ 1783665530433961984
author Nicholas, Lauren
Fischbein, Rebecca
Ernst-Milner, Stephanie
Wani, Roshni
author_facet Nicholas, Lauren
Fischbein, Rebecca
Ernst-Milner, Stephanie
Wani, Roshni
author_sort Nicholas, Lauren
collection PubMed
description We conducted a search for international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. We found 25 resources from 13 countries/regions and extracted information related to general screening as well as screening related to specific monochorionic complications, including twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective fetal growth restriction (SFGR), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Findings reveal universal recommendation for the early establishment of chorionicity. Near-universal recommendation was found for bi-weekly ultrasounds beginning around gestational week 16; routine TTTS and SFGR surveillance comprised of regularly assessing fetal growth, amniotic fluids, and bladder visibility; and fetal anatomical scanning between gestational weeks 18–22. Conflicting recommendation was found for nuchal translucency screening; second-trimester scanning for cervical length; routine TAPS screening; and routine umbilical artery, umbilical vein, and ductus venosus assessment. We conclude that across international agencies and organizations, clinical guidelines related to monochorionic prenatal screening vary considerably. This discord raises concerns related to equitable access to evidence-based monochorionic prenatal care; the ability to create reliable international datasets to help improve the quality of monochorionic research; and the promotion of patient safety and best monochorionic outcomes. Patients globally may benefit from the coming together of international bodies to develop inclusive universal monochorionic prenatal screening standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7962833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79628332021-03-17 Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies Nicholas, Lauren Fischbein, Rebecca Ernst-Milner, Stephanie Wani, Roshni J Clin Med Review We conducted a search for international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. We found 25 resources from 13 countries/regions and extracted information related to general screening as well as screening related to specific monochorionic complications, including twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective fetal growth restriction (SFGR), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Findings reveal universal recommendation for the early establishment of chorionicity. Near-universal recommendation was found for bi-weekly ultrasounds beginning around gestational week 16; routine TTTS and SFGR surveillance comprised of regularly assessing fetal growth, amniotic fluids, and bladder visibility; and fetal anatomical scanning between gestational weeks 18–22. Conflicting recommendation was found for nuchal translucency screening; second-trimester scanning for cervical length; routine TAPS screening; and routine umbilical artery, umbilical vein, and ductus venosus assessment. We conclude that across international agencies and organizations, clinical guidelines related to monochorionic prenatal screening vary considerably. This discord raises concerns related to equitable access to evidence-based monochorionic prenatal care; the ability to create reliable international datasets to help improve the quality of monochorionic research; and the promotion of patient safety and best monochorionic outcomes. Patients globally may benefit from the coming together of international bodies to develop inclusive universal monochorionic prenatal screening standards. MDPI 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7962833/ /pubmed/33800344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051128 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Nicholas, Lauren
Fischbein, Rebecca
Ernst-Milner, Stephanie
Wani, Roshni
Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
title Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
title_full Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
title_fullStr Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
title_full_unstemmed Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
title_short Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
title_sort review of international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051128
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholaslauren reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies
AT fischbeinrebecca reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies
AT ernstmilnerstephanie reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies
AT waniroshni reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies