Cargando…
Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies
We conducted a search for international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. We found 25 resources from 13 countries/regions and extracted information related to general screening as well as screening related to specific monochorionic complications, inc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051128 |
_version_ | 1783665530433961984 |
---|---|
author | Nicholas, Lauren Fischbein, Rebecca Ernst-Milner, Stephanie Wani, Roshni |
author_facet | Nicholas, Lauren Fischbein, Rebecca Ernst-Milner, Stephanie Wani, Roshni |
author_sort | Nicholas, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | We conducted a search for international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. We found 25 resources from 13 countries/regions and extracted information related to general screening as well as screening related to specific monochorionic complications, including twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective fetal growth restriction (SFGR), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Findings reveal universal recommendation for the early establishment of chorionicity. Near-universal recommendation was found for bi-weekly ultrasounds beginning around gestational week 16; routine TTTS and SFGR surveillance comprised of regularly assessing fetal growth, amniotic fluids, and bladder visibility; and fetal anatomical scanning between gestational weeks 18–22. Conflicting recommendation was found for nuchal translucency screening; second-trimester scanning for cervical length; routine TAPS screening; and routine umbilical artery, umbilical vein, and ductus venosus assessment. We conclude that across international agencies and organizations, clinical guidelines related to monochorionic prenatal screening vary considerably. This discord raises concerns related to equitable access to evidence-based monochorionic prenatal care; the ability to create reliable international datasets to help improve the quality of monochorionic research; and the promotion of patient safety and best monochorionic outcomes. Patients globally may benefit from the coming together of international bodies to develop inclusive universal monochorionic prenatal screening standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7962833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79628332021-03-17 Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies Nicholas, Lauren Fischbein, Rebecca Ernst-Milner, Stephanie Wani, Roshni J Clin Med Review We conducted a search for international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. We found 25 resources from 13 countries/regions and extracted information related to general screening as well as screening related to specific monochorionic complications, including twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), selective fetal growth restriction (SFGR), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Findings reveal universal recommendation for the early establishment of chorionicity. Near-universal recommendation was found for bi-weekly ultrasounds beginning around gestational week 16; routine TTTS and SFGR surveillance comprised of regularly assessing fetal growth, amniotic fluids, and bladder visibility; and fetal anatomical scanning between gestational weeks 18–22. Conflicting recommendation was found for nuchal translucency screening; second-trimester scanning for cervical length; routine TAPS screening; and routine umbilical artery, umbilical vein, and ductus venosus assessment. We conclude that across international agencies and organizations, clinical guidelines related to monochorionic prenatal screening vary considerably. This discord raises concerns related to equitable access to evidence-based monochorionic prenatal care; the ability to create reliable international datasets to help improve the quality of monochorionic research; and the promotion of patient safety and best monochorionic outcomes. Patients globally may benefit from the coming together of international bodies to develop inclusive universal monochorionic prenatal screening standards. MDPI 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7962833/ /pubmed/33800344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051128 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Nicholas, Lauren Fischbein, Rebecca Ernst-Milner, Stephanie Wani, Roshni Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies |
title | Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies |
title_full | Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies |
title_fullStr | Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies |
title_short | Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies |
title_sort | review of international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicholaslauren reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies AT fischbeinrebecca reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies AT ernstmilnerstephanie reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies AT waniroshni reviewofinternationalclinicalguidelinesrelatedtoprenatalscreeningduringmonochorionicpregnancies |