Cargando…

Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex and severe neurodegenerative disease that still lacks effective methods of diagnosis. The current diagnostic methods of AD rely on cognitive tests, imaging techniques and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ42), total tau protein and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Chun-Hung, Lin, Chieh-Hsin, Lane, Hsien-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7963160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052761
_version_ 1783665578239590400
author Chang, Chun-Hung
Lin, Chieh-Hsin
Lane, Hsien-Yuan
author_facet Chang, Chun-Hung
Lin, Chieh-Hsin
Lane, Hsien-Yuan
author_sort Chang, Chun-Hung
collection PubMed
description Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex and severe neurodegenerative disease that still lacks effective methods of diagnosis. The current diagnostic methods of AD rely on cognitive tests, imaging techniques and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ42), total tau protein and hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau). However, the available methods are expensive and relatively invasive. Artificial intelligence techniques like machine learning tools have being increasingly used in precision diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the machine learning and novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for reviews and trials that investigated the machine learning and novel biomarkers in diagnosis of AD. Results: In additional to Aβ and tau-related biomarkers, biomarkers according to other mechanisms of AD pathology have been investigated. Neuronal injury biomarker includes neurofiliament light (NFL). Biomarkers about synaptic dysfunction and/or loss includes neurogranin, BACE1, synaptotagmin, SNAP-25, GAP-43, synaptophysin. Biomarkers about neuroinflammation includes sTREM2, and YKL-40. Besides, d-glutamate is one of coagonists at the NMDARs. Several machine learning algorithms including support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest, and naïve Bayes) to build an optimal predictive model to distinguish patients with AD from healthy controls. Conclusions: Our results revealed machine learning with novel biomarkers and multiple variables may increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of AD. Rapid and cost-effective HPLC for biomarkers and machine learning algorithms may assist physicians in diagnosing AD in outpatient clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7963160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79631602021-03-17 Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Chang, Chun-Hung Lin, Chieh-Hsin Lane, Hsien-Yuan Int J Mol Sci Review Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex and severe neurodegenerative disease that still lacks effective methods of diagnosis. The current diagnostic methods of AD rely on cognitive tests, imaging techniques and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ42), total tau protein and hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau). However, the available methods are expensive and relatively invasive. Artificial intelligence techniques like machine learning tools have being increasingly used in precision diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the machine learning and novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for reviews and trials that investigated the machine learning and novel biomarkers in diagnosis of AD. Results: In additional to Aβ and tau-related biomarkers, biomarkers according to other mechanisms of AD pathology have been investigated. Neuronal injury biomarker includes neurofiliament light (NFL). Biomarkers about synaptic dysfunction and/or loss includes neurogranin, BACE1, synaptotagmin, SNAP-25, GAP-43, synaptophysin. Biomarkers about neuroinflammation includes sTREM2, and YKL-40. Besides, d-glutamate is one of coagonists at the NMDARs. Several machine learning algorithms including support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest, and naïve Bayes) to build an optimal predictive model to distinguish patients with AD from healthy controls. Conclusions: Our results revealed machine learning with novel biomarkers and multiple variables may increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of AD. Rapid and cost-effective HPLC for biomarkers and machine learning algorithms may assist physicians in diagnosing AD in outpatient clinics. MDPI 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7963160/ /pubmed/33803217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052761 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chang, Chun-Hung
Lin, Chieh-Hsin
Lane, Hsien-Yuan
Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
title Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort machine learning and novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7963160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052761
work_keys_str_mv AT changchunhung machinelearningandnovelbiomarkersforthediagnosisofalzheimersdisease
AT linchiehhsin machinelearningandnovelbiomarkersforthediagnosisofalzheimersdisease
AT lanehsienyuan machinelearningandnovelbiomarkersforthediagnosisofalzheimersdisease