Cargando…

Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?

Additional “capital buffers”, such as the countercyclical capital buffer, were introduced after the 2008/09 crisis. These buffers were requested in addition to banks’ minimum capital requirements. They should be built up during good times and can be used during bad times. While buffer requirements w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bremus, Franziska, Menkhoff, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7964463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2875-8
_version_ 1783665639009812480
author Bremus, Franziska
Menkhoff, Lukas
author_facet Bremus, Franziska
Menkhoff, Lukas
author_sort Bremus, Franziska
collection PubMed
description Additional “capital buffers”, such as the countercyclical capital buffer, were introduced after the 2008/09 crisis. These buffers were requested in addition to banks’ minimum capital requirements. They should be built up during good times and can be used during bad times. While buffer requirements were reduced quickly in the spring of 2020, financial institutions have been reluctant to use the additional leeway as they may fear market stigma effects if capital ratios fall and they might abstain from new loans due to high uncertainty. The article argues in favor of a more simple and transparent organisation of macroprudential regulation as measures to raise the effectiveness of capital buffers, especially during a downturn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7964463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79644632021-03-17 Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam? Bremus, Franziska Menkhoff, Lukas Wirtschaftsdienst Analysen und Berichte Additional “capital buffers”, such as the countercyclical capital buffer, were introduced after the 2008/09 crisis. These buffers were requested in addition to banks’ minimum capital requirements. They should be built up during good times and can be used during bad times. While buffer requirements were reduced quickly in the spring of 2020, financial institutions have been reluctant to use the additional leeway as they may fear market stigma effects if capital ratios fall and they might abstain from new loans due to high uncertainty. The article argues in favor of a more simple and transparent organisation of macroprudential regulation as measures to raise the effectiveness of capital buffers, especially during a downturn. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7964463/ /pubmed/33746305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2875-8 Text en © Der/die Autor:in(nen) 2021 Open Access: Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de). Open Access wird durch die ZBW — Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft gefördert.
spellingShingle Analysen und Berichte
Bremus, Franziska
Menkhoff, Lukas
Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?
title Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?
title_full Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?
title_fullStr Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?
title_full_unstemmed Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?
title_short Eigenkapitalpuffer im Abschwung wirksam?
title_sort eigenkapitalpuffer im abschwung wirksam?
topic Analysen und Berichte
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7964463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2875-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bremusfranziska eigenkapitalpufferimabschwungwirksam
AT menkhofflukas eigenkapitalpufferimabschwungwirksam