Cargando…

Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND: The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo, Studerus, Erich, Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio, Irving, Jessica, Catalan, Ana, Oliver, Dominic, Baldwin, Helen, Danese, Andrea, Fazel, Seena, Steyerberg, Ewout W, Stahl, Daniel, Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa120
_version_ 1783665643185242112
author Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
Studerus, Erich
Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio
Irving, Jessica
Catalan, Ana
Oliver, Dominic
Baldwin, Helen
Danese, Andrea
Fazel, Seena
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Stahl, Daniel
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
author_facet Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
Studerus, Erich
Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio
Irving, Jessica
Catalan, Ana
Oliver, Dominic
Baldwin, Helen
Danese, Andrea
Fazel, Seena
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Stahl, Daniel
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
author_sort Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders. METHODS: PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models. FINDINGS: Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy. INTERPRETATION: To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7965077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79650772021-03-22 Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo Studerus, Erich Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio Irving, Jessica Catalan, Ana Oliver, Dominic Baldwin, Helen Danese, Andrea Fazel, Seena Steyerberg, Ewout W Stahl, Daniel Fusar-Poli, Paolo Schizophr Bull Regular Articles BACKGROUND: The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders. METHODS: PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models. FINDINGS: Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy. INTERPRETATION: To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap. Oxford University Press 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7965077/ /pubmed/32914178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa120 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
Studerus, Erich
Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio
Irving, Jessica
Catalan, Ana
Oliver, Dominic
Baldwin, Helen
Danese, Andrea
Fazel, Seena
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Stahl, Daniel
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
title Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
title_full Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
title_short Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
title_sort implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa120
work_keys_str_mv AT salazardepablogonzalo implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT studeruserich implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT vaquerizoserranojulio implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT irvingjessica implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT catalanana implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT oliverdominic implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT baldwinhelen implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT daneseandrea implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT fazelseena implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT steyerbergewoutw implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT stahldaniel implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice
AT fusarpolipaolo implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice