Cargando…
Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
BACKGROUND: The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognosti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa120 |
_version_ | 1783665643185242112 |
---|---|
author | Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo Studerus, Erich Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio Irving, Jessica Catalan, Ana Oliver, Dominic Baldwin, Helen Danese, Andrea Fazel, Seena Steyerberg, Ewout W Stahl, Daniel Fusar-Poli, Paolo |
author_facet | Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo Studerus, Erich Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio Irving, Jessica Catalan, Ana Oliver, Dominic Baldwin, Helen Danese, Andrea Fazel, Seena Steyerberg, Ewout W Stahl, Daniel Fusar-Poli, Paolo |
author_sort | Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders. METHODS: PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models. FINDINGS: Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy. INTERPRETATION: To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7965077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79650772021-03-22 Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo Studerus, Erich Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio Irving, Jessica Catalan, Ana Oliver, Dominic Baldwin, Helen Danese, Andrea Fazel, Seena Steyerberg, Ewout W Stahl, Daniel Fusar-Poli, Paolo Schizophr Bull Regular Articles BACKGROUND: The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders. METHODS: PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models. FINDINGS: Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy. INTERPRETATION: To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap. Oxford University Press 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7965077/ /pubmed/32914178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa120 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo Studerus, Erich Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio Irving, Jessica Catalan, Ana Oliver, Dominic Baldwin, Helen Danese, Andrea Fazel, Seena Steyerberg, Ewout W Stahl, Daniel Fusar-Poli, Paolo Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice |
title | Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice |
title_full | Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice |
title_short | Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice |
title_sort | implementing precision psychiatry: a systematic review of individualized prediction models for clinical practice |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7965077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salazardepablogonzalo implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT studeruserich implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT vaquerizoserranojulio implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT irvingjessica implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT catalanana implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT oliverdominic implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT baldwinhelen implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT daneseandrea implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT fazelseena implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT steyerbergewoutw implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT stahldaniel implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice AT fusarpolipaolo implementingprecisionpsychiatryasystematicreviewofindividualizedpredictionmodelsforclinicalpractice |