Cargando…

When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education

Science denial has a long history of causing harm in contemporary society when ignored. Recent discussions of science denial suggest that correcting people’s false beliefs rarely has an impact on eliminating the adherence to false beliefs and assumptions, which is called the backfire effect. This pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fackler, Ayça
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00198-y
_version_ 1783665706303225856
author Fackler, Ayça
author_facet Fackler, Ayça
author_sort Fackler, Ayça
collection PubMed
description Science denial has a long history of causing harm in contemporary society when ignored. Recent discussions of science denial suggest that correcting people’s false beliefs rarely has an impact on eliminating the adherence to false beliefs and assumptions, which is called the backfire effect. This paper brings the backfire effect within the context of science denial to the attention of science education researchers and practitioners and discusses the potential role(s) of epistemic understanding of knowledge production in science in dealing with the rejection of scientific evidence and claims in science classrooms. The use of epistemic understanding of knowledge production in science with a focus on avoiding the backfire effect may increase the potential for science education research to produce fruitful strategies which advance students’ attitudes toward science and deepen students’ understanding of how science works through divergent perspectives. There are some areas that need to be focused on and investigated for their potential to combat science denial and the backfire effect while foregrounding the role(s) epistemic understanding of knowledge production for science instruction. These areas include expanding ways of knowing and marking the boundary between the scientific way of knowing and other ways of knowing at the same time, comparing claims and arguments that derive from different frameworks, teaching about the power and limitations of science, and bringing different and similar ways science is done to students’ attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7966612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79666122021-03-17 When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education Fackler, Ayça Sci Educ (Dordr) Article Science denial has a long history of causing harm in contemporary society when ignored. Recent discussions of science denial suggest that correcting people’s false beliefs rarely has an impact on eliminating the adherence to false beliefs and assumptions, which is called the backfire effect. This paper brings the backfire effect within the context of science denial to the attention of science education researchers and practitioners and discusses the potential role(s) of epistemic understanding of knowledge production in science in dealing with the rejection of scientific evidence and claims in science classrooms. The use of epistemic understanding of knowledge production in science with a focus on avoiding the backfire effect may increase the potential for science education research to produce fruitful strategies which advance students’ attitudes toward science and deepen students’ understanding of how science works through divergent perspectives. There are some areas that need to be focused on and investigated for their potential to combat science denial and the backfire effect while foregrounding the role(s) epistemic understanding of knowledge production for science instruction. These areas include expanding ways of knowing and marking the boundary between the scientific way of knowing and other ways of knowing at the same time, comparing claims and arguments that derive from different frameworks, teaching about the power and limitations of science, and bringing different and similar ways science is done to students’ attention. Springer Netherlands 2021-03-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7966612/ /pubmed/33746364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00198-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Fackler, Ayça
When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education
title When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education
title_full When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education
title_fullStr When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education
title_full_unstemmed When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education
title_short When Science Denial Meets Epistemic Understanding: Fostering a Research Agenda for Science Education
title_sort when science denial meets epistemic understanding: fostering a research agenda for science education
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33746364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00198-y
work_keys_str_mv AT facklerayca whensciencedenialmeetsepistemicunderstandingfosteringaresearchagendaforscienceeducation