Cargando…

In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of surgical and non-surgical air-polishing in vitro efficacy for implant surface decontamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred eighty implants were distributed to three differently angulated bone defect models (30°, 60°, 90°). Biofilm was imitated using indelible red colo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuchscheerer, Vivian, Eickholz, Peter, Dannewitz, Bettina, Ratka, Christoph, Zuhr, Otto, Petsos, Hari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32813077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03476-1
_version_ 1783665712247603200
author Tuchscheerer, Vivian
Eickholz, Peter
Dannewitz, Bettina
Ratka, Christoph
Zuhr, Otto
Petsos, Hari
author_facet Tuchscheerer, Vivian
Eickholz, Peter
Dannewitz, Bettina
Ratka, Christoph
Zuhr, Otto
Petsos, Hari
author_sort Tuchscheerer, Vivian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of surgical and non-surgical air-polishing in vitro efficacy for implant surface decontamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred eighty implants were distributed to three differently angulated bone defect models (30°, 60°, 90°). Biofilm was imitated using indelible red color. Sixty implants were used for each defect, 20 of which were air-polished with three different types of glycine air powder abrasion (GAPA1–3) combinations. Within 20 equally air-polished implants, a surgical and non-surgical (with/without mucosa mask) procedure were simulated. All implants were photographed to determine the uncleaned surface. Changes in surface morphology were assessed using scanning electron micrographs (SEM). RESULTS: Cleaning efficacy did not show any significant differences between GAPA1–3 for surgical and non-surgical application. Within a cleaning method significant (p < 0.001) differences for GAPA2 between 30° (11.77 ± 2.73%) and 90° (7.25 ± 1.42%) in the non-surgical and 30° (8.26 ± 1.02%) and 60° (5.02 ± 0.84%) in the surgical simulation occurred. The surgical use of air-polishing (6.68 ± 1.66%) was significantly superior (p < 0.001) to the non-surgical (10.13 ± 2.75%). SEM micrographs showed no surface damages after use of GAPA. CONCLUSIONS: Air-polishing is an efficient, surface protective method for surgical and non-surgical implant surface decontamination in this in vitro model. No method resulted in a complete cleaning of the implant surface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Air-polishing appears to be promising for implant surface decontamination regardless of the device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7966646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79666462021-04-01 In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations Tuchscheerer, Vivian Eickholz, Peter Dannewitz, Bettina Ratka, Christoph Zuhr, Otto Petsos, Hari Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of surgical and non-surgical air-polishing in vitro efficacy for implant surface decontamination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred eighty implants were distributed to three differently angulated bone defect models (30°, 60°, 90°). Biofilm was imitated using indelible red color. Sixty implants were used for each defect, 20 of which were air-polished with three different types of glycine air powder abrasion (GAPA1–3) combinations. Within 20 equally air-polished implants, a surgical and non-surgical (with/without mucosa mask) procedure were simulated. All implants were photographed to determine the uncleaned surface. Changes in surface morphology were assessed using scanning electron micrographs (SEM). RESULTS: Cleaning efficacy did not show any significant differences between GAPA1–3 for surgical and non-surgical application. Within a cleaning method significant (p < 0.001) differences for GAPA2 between 30° (11.77 ± 2.73%) and 90° (7.25 ± 1.42%) in the non-surgical and 30° (8.26 ± 1.02%) and 60° (5.02 ± 0.84%) in the surgical simulation occurred. The surgical use of air-polishing (6.68 ± 1.66%) was significantly superior (p < 0.001) to the non-surgical (10.13 ± 2.75%). SEM micrographs showed no surface damages after use of GAPA. CONCLUSIONS: Air-polishing is an efficient, surface protective method for surgical and non-surgical implant surface decontamination in this in vitro model. No method resulted in a complete cleaning of the implant surface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Air-polishing appears to be promising for implant surface decontamination regardless of the device. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7966646/ /pubmed/32813077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03476-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tuchscheerer, Vivian
Eickholz, Peter
Dannewitz, Bettina
Ratka, Christoph
Zuhr, Otto
Petsos, Hari
In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
title In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
title_full In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
title_fullStr In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
title_full_unstemmed In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
title_short In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
title_sort in vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32813077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03476-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tuchscheerervivian invitrosurgicalandnonsurgicalairpolishingefficacyforimplantsurfacedecontaminationinthreedifferentdefectconfigurations
AT eickholzpeter invitrosurgicalandnonsurgicalairpolishingefficacyforimplantsurfacedecontaminationinthreedifferentdefectconfigurations
AT dannewitzbettina invitrosurgicalandnonsurgicalairpolishingefficacyforimplantsurfacedecontaminationinthreedifferentdefectconfigurations
AT ratkachristoph invitrosurgicalandnonsurgicalairpolishingefficacyforimplantsurfacedecontaminationinthreedifferentdefectconfigurations
AT zuhrotto invitrosurgicalandnonsurgicalairpolishingefficacyforimplantsurfacedecontaminationinthreedifferentdefectconfigurations
AT petsoshari invitrosurgicalandnonsurgicalairpolishingefficacyforimplantsurfacedecontaminationinthreedifferentdefectconfigurations