Cargando…

Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design

BACKGROUND: Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical periodontal p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guarnieri, Renzo, Miccoli, Gabriele, Reda, Rodolfo, Mazzoni, Alessandro, Di Nardo, Dario, Testarelli, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33728493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6
_version_ 1783665715540131840
author Guarnieri, Renzo
Miccoli, Gabriele
Reda, Rodolfo
Mazzoni, Alessandro
Di Nardo, Dario
Testarelli, Luca
author_facet Guarnieri, Renzo
Miccoli, Gabriele
Reda, Rodolfo
Mazzoni, Alessandro
Di Nardo, Dario
Testarelli, Luca
author_sort Guarnieri, Renzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical periodontal parameters, marginal bone levels, and proinflammatory cytokine levels around dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients each received 2 implants with one-stage protocol in a split-mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser microgrooved surface (LMS group) and one healing and prosthetic abutments with machined surface (MS group) were used. Four months following implant placement (T0), the healing abutments were disconnnected and reconnected three times to carry out the impression procedures and metal framework try-in. Four weeks later (T1), definitive prosthetic abutments were installated with screw-retained crowns. Modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded at T0 and T1. At the same time points, samples for immunological analyses were taken from the sulcus around each implant. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were analyzed for interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using the ELISA kit. RESULTS: At T0 and T1, mPI and mGI showed no statistical difference between the two groups, while higher PD and BoP values were noted for the MS group (P < 0.05). The mean PICF volume and mean concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and (TNF)-α in the LMS group were statistically less than those in the MS group (P < 0.05). In addition, comparison of IL-6 and IL-1β mean concentrations at T0 and T1 in the MS group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) over time, which was not noted for the LMS. CONCLUSION: Disconnection/reconnection of healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser-microgrooved surface resulted in less inflammatory molecular response compared with conventional machined ones. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04415801, registered 03/06/2020
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7966690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79666902021-04-01 Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design Guarnieri, Renzo Miccoli, Gabriele Reda, Rodolfo Mazzoni, Alessandro Di Nardo, Dario Testarelli, Luca Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical periodontal parameters, marginal bone levels, and proinflammatory cytokine levels around dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients each received 2 implants with one-stage protocol in a split-mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser microgrooved surface (LMS group) and one healing and prosthetic abutments with machined surface (MS group) were used. Four months following implant placement (T0), the healing abutments were disconnnected and reconnected three times to carry out the impression procedures and metal framework try-in. Four weeks later (T1), definitive prosthetic abutments were installated with screw-retained crowns. Modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded at T0 and T1. At the same time points, samples for immunological analyses were taken from the sulcus around each implant. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were analyzed for interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using the ELISA kit. RESULTS: At T0 and T1, mPI and mGI showed no statistical difference between the two groups, while higher PD and BoP values were noted for the MS group (P < 0.05). The mean PICF volume and mean concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and (TNF)-α in the LMS group were statistically less than those in the MS group (P < 0.05). In addition, comparison of IL-6 and IL-1β mean concentrations at T0 and T1 in the MS group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) over time, which was not noted for the LMS. CONCLUSION: Disconnection/reconnection of healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser-microgrooved surface resulted in less inflammatory molecular response compared with conventional machined ones. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04415801, registered 03/06/2020 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7966690/ /pubmed/33728493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Guarnieri, Renzo
Miccoli, Gabriele
Reda, Rodolfo
Mazzoni, Alessandro
Di Nardo, Dario
Testarelli, Luca
Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_full Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_fullStr Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_full_unstemmed Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_short Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_sort laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33728493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6
work_keys_str_mv AT guarnierirenzo lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT miccoligabriele lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT redarodolfo lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT mazzonialessandro lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT dinardodario lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT testarelliluca lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign