Cargando…

Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systemic review is to compare different treatments for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) to inform evidence‐based recommendations for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Vasculitis Foundation (VF) Vasculitis Mana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Springer, Jason M., Kalot, Mohamad A., Husainat, Nedaa M., Byram, Kevin W., Dua, Anisha B., James, Karen E., Chang Lin, Yih, Turgunbaev, Marat, Villa‐Forte, Alexandra, Abril, Andy, Langford, Carol, Maz, Mehrdad, Chung, Sharon A., Mustafa, Reem A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11230
_version_ 1783665756522676224
author Springer, Jason M.
Kalot, Mohamad A.
Husainat, Nedaa M.
Byram, Kevin W.
Dua, Anisha B.
James, Karen E.
Chang Lin, Yih
Turgunbaev, Marat
Villa‐Forte, Alexandra
Abril, Andy
Langford, Carol
Maz, Mehrdad
Chung, Sharon A.
Mustafa, Reem A.
author_facet Springer, Jason M.
Kalot, Mohamad A.
Husainat, Nedaa M.
Byram, Kevin W.
Dua, Anisha B.
James, Karen E.
Chang Lin, Yih
Turgunbaev, Marat
Villa‐Forte, Alexandra
Abril, Andy
Langford, Carol
Maz, Mehrdad
Chung, Sharon A.
Mustafa, Reem A.
author_sort Springer, Jason M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systemic review is to compare different treatments for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) to inform evidence‐based recommendations for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Vasculitis Foundation (VF) Vasculitis Management Guidelines. METHODS: A systemic review was conducted by searching articles in English using OVID Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles were screened for suitability in addressing PICO questions, with studies presenting the highest level of evidence given preference. RESULTS: A total of 729 full‐text articles addressing GPA and MPA PICO questions were reviewed. For remission induction, rituximab was shown to be noninferior to cyclophosphamide (CYC) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.55, moderate certainty of evidence). The addition of plasma exchange to induction therapy in severe disease did not improve the composite end point of death or end stage renal disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86 [95% confidence interval CI: 0.65, 1.13], moderate certainty of evidence). In nonsevere disease, methotrexate was noninferior to CYC for induction of remission (remission at 6 months of 90% vs. 94%). For maintenance of remission, methotrexate and azathioprine showed no difference in the risk of relapse over a mean follow‐up of 29 months (HR: 0.92, [95% CI: 0.52, 1.65]low certainty of evidence). As maintenance therapy, rituximab was superior to a tapering azathioprine strategy in major relapse‐free survival at 28 months (HR: 6.61, [95% CI: 1.56, 27.96], moderate certainty of evidence). In two randomized trials, longer‐term azathioprine maintenance therapy (>24 months) is associated with fewer relapses without an increase in adverse events. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the benefits and toxicities of different treatment options for GPA and MPA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7966881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79668812021-03-19 Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments Springer, Jason M. Kalot, Mohamad A. Husainat, Nedaa M. Byram, Kevin W. Dua, Anisha B. James, Karen E. Chang Lin, Yih Turgunbaev, Marat Villa‐Forte, Alexandra Abril, Andy Langford, Carol Maz, Mehrdad Chung, Sharon A. Mustafa, Reem A. ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systemic review is to compare different treatments for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) to inform evidence‐based recommendations for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Vasculitis Foundation (VF) Vasculitis Management Guidelines. METHODS: A systemic review was conducted by searching articles in English using OVID Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles were screened for suitability in addressing PICO questions, with studies presenting the highest level of evidence given preference. RESULTS: A total of 729 full‐text articles addressing GPA and MPA PICO questions were reviewed. For remission induction, rituximab was shown to be noninferior to cyclophosphamide (CYC) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.55, moderate certainty of evidence). The addition of plasma exchange to induction therapy in severe disease did not improve the composite end point of death or end stage renal disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86 [95% confidence interval CI: 0.65, 1.13], moderate certainty of evidence). In nonsevere disease, methotrexate was noninferior to CYC for induction of remission (remission at 6 months of 90% vs. 94%). For maintenance of remission, methotrexate and azathioprine showed no difference in the risk of relapse over a mean follow‐up of 29 months (HR: 0.92, [95% CI: 0.52, 1.65]low certainty of evidence). As maintenance therapy, rituximab was superior to a tapering azathioprine strategy in major relapse‐free survival at 28 months (HR: 6.61, [95% CI: 1.56, 27.96], moderate certainty of evidence). In two randomized trials, longer‐term azathioprine maintenance therapy (>24 months) is associated with fewer relapses without an increase in adverse events. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the benefits and toxicities of different treatment options for GPA and MPA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7966881/ /pubmed/33590973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11230 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Springer, Jason M.
Kalot, Mohamad A.
Husainat, Nedaa M.
Byram, Kevin W.
Dua, Anisha B.
James, Karen E.
Chang Lin, Yih
Turgunbaev, Marat
Villa‐Forte, Alexandra
Abril, Andy
Langford, Carol
Maz, Mehrdad
Chung, Sharon A.
Mustafa, Reem A.
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
title Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
title_full Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
title_fullStr Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
title_full_unstemmed Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
title_short Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Benefits and Harms of Common Treatments
title_sort granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of benefits and harms of common treatments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11230
work_keys_str_mv AT springerjasonm granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT kalotmohamada granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT husainatnedaam granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT byramkevinw granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT duaanishab granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT jameskarene granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT changlinyih granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT turgunbaevmarat granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT villafortealexandra granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT abrilandy granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT langfordcarol granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT mazmehrdad granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT chungsharona granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments
AT mustafareema granulomatosiswithpolyangiitisandmicroscopicpolyangiitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbenefitsandharmsofcommontreatments