Cargando…

Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology

An isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) quantification method has been applied for the determination of five substances (amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA) in wastewater for the application in wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). A previously validated method that used a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge, Bijlsma, Lubertus, Sancho Llopis, Juan Vicente, Roig-Navarro, Antoni F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33730202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03287-7
_version_ 1783665765096882176
author Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge
Bijlsma, Lubertus
Sancho Llopis, Juan Vicente
Roig-Navarro, Antoni F.
author_facet Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge
Bijlsma, Lubertus
Sancho Llopis, Juan Vicente
Roig-Navarro, Antoni F.
author_sort Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge
collection PubMed
description An isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) quantification method has been applied for the determination of five substances (amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA) in wastewater for the application in wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). A previously validated method that used a calibration curve for quantification was modified to apply IPD. The two approaches were compared in terms of analytical uncertainty in recovery studies of quality control samples, i.e. six wastewater samples from different geographical origins spiked at two concentration levels. Both methods were reliable as they passed (z-score < 2) in an interlaboratory exercise. After 60 individual determinations, IPD provided 11 results outside recovery limits (70–120%) while the previous method produced 31 adverse results. All mean values for IPD were accurate whereas 6 out of 10 results showed RSD values higher than 30% or recoveries outside limits when using the former method. Moreover, the calculated method bias for the latter doubles that of IPD, which, in turn, makes the combined uncertainty (u(c)) much higher. Consequently, a simple change of data treatment—IPD quantification methodology—resulted in a lower uncertainty of the estimated illicit drug concentration, one of the main steps contributing to the final uncertainty in the normalized daily drug consumption through WBE. The current study demonstrated that the employment of IPD can also be very interesting for future applications of WBE, especially when matrix effects are high, complicating accurate quantification. In addition, when a high number of samples and/or compounds need to be analysed, IPD is faster than calibration and, eventually, cost-effective when isotopically labelled internal standard is highly expensive. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-021-03287-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7966919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79669192021-03-17 Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge Bijlsma, Lubertus Sancho Llopis, Juan Vicente Roig-Navarro, Antoni F. Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper An isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) quantification method has been applied for the determination of five substances (amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA) in wastewater for the application in wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). A previously validated method that used a calibration curve for quantification was modified to apply IPD. The two approaches were compared in terms of analytical uncertainty in recovery studies of quality control samples, i.e. six wastewater samples from different geographical origins spiked at two concentration levels. Both methods were reliable as they passed (z-score < 2) in an interlaboratory exercise. After 60 individual determinations, IPD provided 11 results outside recovery limits (70–120%) while the previous method produced 31 adverse results. All mean values for IPD were accurate whereas 6 out of 10 results showed RSD values higher than 30% or recoveries outside limits when using the former method. Moreover, the calculated method bias for the latter doubles that of IPD, which, in turn, makes the combined uncertainty (u(c)) much higher. Consequently, a simple change of data treatment—IPD quantification methodology—resulted in a lower uncertainty of the estimated illicit drug concentration, one of the main steps contributing to the final uncertainty in the normalized daily drug consumption through WBE. The current study demonstrated that the employment of IPD can also be very interesting for future applications of WBE, especially when matrix effects are high, complicating accurate quantification. In addition, when a high number of samples and/or compounds need to be analysed, IPD is faster than calibration and, eventually, cost-effective when isotopically labelled internal standard is highly expensive. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-021-03287-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7966919/ /pubmed/33730202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03287-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge
Bijlsma, Lubertus
Sancho Llopis, Juan Vicente
Roig-Navarro, Antoni F.
Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
title Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
title_full Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
title_fullStr Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
title_full_unstemmed Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
title_short Isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
title_sort isotope pattern deconvolution as a successful alternative to calibration curve for application in wastewater-based epidemiology
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33730202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03287-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pitarchmotellonjorge isotopepatterndeconvolutionasasuccessfulalternativetocalibrationcurveforapplicationinwastewaterbasedepidemiology
AT bijlsmalubertus isotopepatterndeconvolutionasasuccessfulalternativetocalibrationcurveforapplicationinwastewaterbasedepidemiology
AT sanchollopisjuanvicente isotopepatterndeconvolutionasasuccessfulalternativetocalibrationcurveforapplicationinwastewaterbasedepidemiology
AT roignavarroantonif isotopepatterndeconvolutionasasuccessfulalternativetocalibrationcurveforapplicationinwastewaterbasedepidemiology