Cargando…

Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE: The machine learning–based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Sua, Sheng, Yang, Blitzblau, Rachel, McDuff, Susan, Champ, Colin, Morrison, Jay, O’Neill, Leigh, Catalano, Suzanne, Yin, Fang-Fang, Wu, Q. Jackie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100656
_version_ 1783665775668625408
author Yoo, Sua
Sheng, Yang
Blitzblau, Rachel
McDuff, Susan
Champ, Colin
Morrison, Jay
O’Neill, Leigh
Catalano, Suzanne
Yin, Fang-Fang
Wu, Q. Jackie
author_facet Yoo, Sua
Sheng, Yang
Blitzblau, Rachel
McDuff, Susan
Champ, Colin
Morrison, Jay
O’Neill, Leigh
Catalano, Suzanne
Yin, Fang-Fang
Wu, Q. Jackie
author_sort Yoo, Sua
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The machine learning–based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 102 patients of breast or chest wall treatment plans were prospectively evaluated with institutional review board approval. A human planner executed MLAP to create an auto-plan via automation of fluence maps generation. If judged necessary, a planner further fine-tuned the fluence maps to reach a final plan. Planners recorded the time required for auto-planning and manual modification. Target (ie, breast or chest wall and nodes) coverage and dose homogeneity were compared between the auto-plan and final plan. RESULTS: Cases without nodes (n = 71) showed negligible (<1%) differences for target coverage and dose homogeneity between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases with nodes (n = 31) also showed negligible difference for target coverage. However, mean ± standard deviation of volume receiving 105% of the prescribed dose and maximum dose were reduced from 43.0% ± 26.3% to 39.4% ± 23.7% and 119.7% ± 9.5% to 114.4% ± 8.8% from auto-plan to final plan, respectively, all with P ≤ .01 for cases with nodes (n = 31). Mean ± standard deviation time spent for auto-plans and additional fluence modification for final plans were 12.1 ± 9.3 and 13.1 ± 12.9 minutes, respectively, for cases without nodes, and 16.4 ± 9.7 and 26.4 ± 16.4 minutes, respectively, for cases with nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The MLAP tool has been successfully implemented for routine clinical practice and has significantly improved planning efficiency. Clinical experience indicates that auto-plans are sufficient for target coverage, but improvement is warranted to reduce high dose volume for cases with nodal irradiation. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation of auto-planning for patient treatment and the significant importance of integrating human experience and feedback to improve MLAP for better clinical translation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7966969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79669692021-03-19 Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy Yoo, Sua Sheng, Yang Blitzblau, Rachel McDuff, Susan Champ, Colin Morrison, Jay O’Neill, Leigh Catalano, Suzanne Yin, Fang-Fang Wu, Q. Jackie Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The machine learning–based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 102 patients of breast or chest wall treatment plans were prospectively evaluated with institutional review board approval. A human planner executed MLAP to create an auto-plan via automation of fluence maps generation. If judged necessary, a planner further fine-tuned the fluence maps to reach a final plan. Planners recorded the time required for auto-planning and manual modification. Target (ie, breast or chest wall and nodes) coverage and dose homogeneity were compared between the auto-plan and final plan. RESULTS: Cases without nodes (n = 71) showed negligible (<1%) differences for target coverage and dose homogeneity between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases with nodes (n = 31) also showed negligible difference for target coverage. However, mean ± standard deviation of volume receiving 105% of the prescribed dose and maximum dose were reduced from 43.0% ± 26.3% to 39.4% ± 23.7% and 119.7% ± 9.5% to 114.4% ± 8.8% from auto-plan to final plan, respectively, all with P ≤ .01 for cases with nodes (n = 31). Mean ± standard deviation time spent for auto-plans and additional fluence modification for final plans were 12.1 ± 9.3 and 13.1 ± 12.9 minutes, respectively, for cases without nodes, and 16.4 ± 9.7 and 26.4 ± 16.4 minutes, respectively, for cases with nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The MLAP tool has been successfully implemented for routine clinical practice and has significantly improved planning efficiency. Clinical experience indicates that auto-plans are sufficient for target coverage, but improvement is warranted to reduce high dose volume for cases with nodal irradiation. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation of auto-planning for patient treatment and the significant importance of integrating human experience and feedback to improve MLAP for better clinical translation. Elsevier 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7966969/ /pubmed/33748540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100656 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Yoo, Sua
Sheng, Yang
Blitzblau, Rachel
McDuff, Susan
Champ, Colin
Morrison, Jay
O’Neill, Leigh
Catalano, Suzanne
Yin, Fang-Fang
Wu, Q. Jackie
Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
title Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
title_full Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
title_short Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
title_sort clinical experience with machine learning-based automated treatment planning for whole breast radiation therapy
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7966969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100656
work_keys_str_mv AT yoosua clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT shengyang clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT blitzblaurachel clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT mcduffsusan clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT champcolin clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT morrisonjay clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT oneillleigh clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT catalanosuzanne clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT yinfangfang clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy
AT wuqjackie clinicalexperiencewithmachinelearningbasedautomatedtreatmentplanningforwholebreastradiationtherapy