Cargando…

Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Background: The joint position sense (JPS) has been used as an indirect marker of proprioception in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), showing impairment in previous studies. It seems necessary to devise reliable tests to measure proprioceptive deficits in subjects with NSLBP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caña-Pino, Alejandro, Espejo-Antúnez, Luís, Adsuar, José Carmelo, Apolo-Arenas, María Dolores
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052489
_version_ 1783665844312604672
author Caña-Pino, Alejandro
Espejo-Antúnez, Luís
Adsuar, José Carmelo
Apolo-Arenas, María Dolores
author_facet Caña-Pino, Alejandro
Espejo-Antúnez, Luís
Adsuar, José Carmelo
Apolo-Arenas, María Dolores
author_sort Caña-Pino, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description Background: The joint position sense (JPS) has been used as an indirect marker of proprioception in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), showing impairment in previous studies. It seems necessary to devise reliable tests to measure proprioceptive deficits in subjects with NSLBP. The objective of this study was to analyse the test–retest reliability and smallest real difference (SRD) of lumbar proprioception through the JPS indicator in a sample of patients with NSCLBP. Methods: Fifty participants with NSCLBP performed three repetitions of 30° lumbar flexion while standing and sitting using the iPhone(®) inclinometer application to measure the lumbar joint repositioning error. For the reliability analysis, we performed an intra-session test–retest. Results: The total sample ICC values were excellent for standing (0.96) and sitting (0.93) 30° lumbar flexion. In addition, our results showed that, for the total sample, an SRD < 12% can be considered as a true change in proprioception concerning this procedure. On the other hand, men have better reliability than women in both standing and sitting positions. Additionally, the sitting position has better reliability than the standing position. The standard error of measurement (SEM) percentage was 4.2 for standing and 3.8 for sitting. The SRD percentage was 11.6 for standing and 10.4 for sitting. Conclusions: The iPhone(®) inclinometer seems reliable for assessing proprioceptive ability through the lumbar joint repositioning error in subjects with NSCLBP in both standing (ICC = 0.96) and sitting (ICC = 0.93) positions. This technological device showed a lower measurement error for sitting position (SRD < 12%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7967302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79673022021-03-18 Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Caña-Pino, Alejandro Espejo-Antúnez, Luís Adsuar, José Carmelo Apolo-Arenas, María Dolores Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The joint position sense (JPS) has been used as an indirect marker of proprioception in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), showing impairment in previous studies. It seems necessary to devise reliable tests to measure proprioceptive deficits in subjects with NSLBP. The objective of this study was to analyse the test–retest reliability and smallest real difference (SRD) of lumbar proprioception through the JPS indicator in a sample of patients with NSCLBP. Methods: Fifty participants with NSCLBP performed three repetitions of 30° lumbar flexion while standing and sitting using the iPhone(®) inclinometer application to measure the lumbar joint repositioning error. For the reliability analysis, we performed an intra-session test–retest. Results: The total sample ICC values were excellent for standing (0.96) and sitting (0.93) 30° lumbar flexion. In addition, our results showed that, for the total sample, an SRD < 12% can be considered as a true change in proprioception concerning this procedure. On the other hand, men have better reliability than women in both standing and sitting positions. Additionally, the sitting position has better reliability than the standing position. The standard error of measurement (SEM) percentage was 4.2 for standing and 3.8 for sitting. The SRD percentage was 11.6 for standing and 10.4 for sitting. Conclusions: The iPhone(®) inclinometer seems reliable for assessing proprioceptive ability through the lumbar joint repositioning error in subjects with NSCLBP in both standing (ICC = 0.96) and sitting (ICC = 0.93) positions. This technological device showed a lower measurement error for sitting position (SRD < 12%). MDPI 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7967302/ /pubmed/33802528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052489 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Caña-Pino, Alejandro
Espejo-Antúnez, Luís
Adsuar, José Carmelo
Apolo-Arenas, María Dolores
Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
title Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
title_short Test–Retest Reliability of an iPhone(®) Inclinometer Application to Assess the Lumbar Joint Repositioning Error in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
title_sort test–retest reliability of an iphone(®) inclinometer application to assess the lumbar joint repositioning error in non-specific chronic low back pain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052489
work_keys_str_mv AT canapinoalejandro testretestreliabilityofaniphoneinclinometerapplicationtoassessthelumbarjointrepositioningerrorinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT espejoantunezluis testretestreliabilityofaniphoneinclinometerapplicationtoassessthelumbarjointrepositioningerrorinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT adsuarjosecarmelo testretestreliabilityofaniphoneinclinometerapplicationtoassessthelumbarjointrepositioningerrorinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT apoloarenasmariadolores testretestreliabilityofaniphoneinclinometerapplicationtoassessthelumbarjointrepositioningerrorinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain