Cargando…
The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
This paper examines the association between media reporting on suicides and the subsequent suicides. Scientific papers from two online bibliographic sources Medline (PubMed) and PsycINFO were searched. The sample included 108 research papers examining the impact of different types of media stories o...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33804527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052396 |
_version_ | 1783665945597706240 |
---|---|
author | Domaradzki, Jan |
author_facet | Domaradzki, Jan |
author_sort | Domaradzki, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper examines the association between media reporting on suicides and the subsequent suicides. Scientific papers from two online bibliographic sources Medline (PubMed) and PsycINFO were searched. The sample included 108 research papers examining the impact of different types of media stories on suicides. The review revealed that although the media can be a double-edged sword and serve both as a risk and a protective factor, the vast majority of research suggests that the relationship between the media reporting and the actual suicide rates is causal and real. Moreover, both the quantity and the quality of media reporting may trigger additional suicides in society. Simultaneously, research suggests that especially non-fictional presentations of celebrities’ suicides in newspapers and on television news have the biggest influence on the subsequent suicides. Additionally, a strong modelling effect of media reporting on suicide is based on nationality, age, and gender. However, research shows that because a negative reporting style can be modifiable and improved, the media can also have an educative or preventive effect and can reduce the risk of contagion. Consequently, it is important to monitor the implementation of media recommendations for the reporting of suicide, and continuous education of reporters is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7967741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79677412021-03-18 The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review Domaradzki, Jan Int J Environ Res Public Health Review This paper examines the association between media reporting on suicides and the subsequent suicides. Scientific papers from two online bibliographic sources Medline (PubMed) and PsycINFO were searched. The sample included 108 research papers examining the impact of different types of media stories on suicides. The review revealed that although the media can be a double-edged sword and serve both as a risk and a protective factor, the vast majority of research suggests that the relationship between the media reporting and the actual suicide rates is causal and real. Moreover, both the quantity and the quality of media reporting may trigger additional suicides in society. Simultaneously, research suggests that especially non-fictional presentations of celebrities’ suicides in newspapers and on television news have the biggest influence on the subsequent suicides. Additionally, a strong modelling effect of media reporting on suicide is based on nationality, age, and gender. However, research shows that because a negative reporting style can be modifiable and improved, the media can also have an educative or preventive effect and can reduce the risk of contagion. Consequently, it is important to monitor the implementation of media recommendations for the reporting of suicide, and continuous education of reporters is needed. MDPI 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7967741/ /pubmed/33804527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052396 Text en © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Domaradzki, Jan The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review |
title | The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review |
title_full | The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review |
title_short | The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review |
title_sort | werther effect, the papageno effect or no effect? a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33804527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domaradzkijan thewerthereffectthepapagenoeffectornoeffectaliteraturereview AT domaradzkijan werthereffectthepapagenoeffectornoeffectaliteraturereview |