Cargando…

The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review

This paper examines the association between media reporting on suicides and the subsequent suicides. Scientific papers from two online bibliographic sources Medline (PubMed) and PsycINFO were searched. The sample included 108 research papers examining the impact of different types of media stories o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Domaradzki, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33804527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052396
_version_ 1783665945597706240
author Domaradzki, Jan
author_facet Domaradzki, Jan
author_sort Domaradzki, Jan
collection PubMed
description This paper examines the association between media reporting on suicides and the subsequent suicides. Scientific papers from two online bibliographic sources Medline (PubMed) and PsycINFO were searched. The sample included 108 research papers examining the impact of different types of media stories on suicides. The review revealed that although the media can be a double-edged sword and serve both as a risk and a protective factor, the vast majority of research suggests that the relationship between the media reporting and the actual suicide rates is causal and real. Moreover, both the quantity and the quality of media reporting may trigger additional suicides in society. Simultaneously, research suggests that especially non-fictional presentations of celebrities’ suicides in newspapers and on television news have the biggest influence on the subsequent suicides. Additionally, a strong modelling effect of media reporting on suicide is based on nationality, age, and gender. However, research shows that because a negative reporting style can be modifiable and improved, the media can also have an educative or preventive effect and can reduce the risk of contagion. Consequently, it is important to monitor the implementation of media recommendations for the reporting of suicide, and continuous education of reporters is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7967741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79677412021-03-18 The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review Domaradzki, Jan Int J Environ Res Public Health Review This paper examines the association between media reporting on suicides and the subsequent suicides. Scientific papers from two online bibliographic sources Medline (PubMed) and PsycINFO were searched. The sample included 108 research papers examining the impact of different types of media stories on suicides. The review revealed that although the media can be a double-edged sword and serve both as a risk and a protective factor, the vast majority of research suggests that the relationship between the media reporting and the actual suicide rates is causal and real. Moreover, both the quantity and the quality of media reporting may trigger additional suicides in society. Simultaneously, research suggests that especially non-fictional presentations of celebrities’ suicides in newspapers and on television news have the biggest influence on the subsequent suicides. Additionally, a strong modelling effect of media reporting on suicide is based on nationality, age, and gender. However, research shows that because a negative reporting style can be modifiable and improved, the media can also have an educative or preventive effect and can reduce the risk of contagion. Consequently, it is important to monitor the implementation of media recommendations for the reporting of suicide, and continuous education of reporters is needed. MDPI 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7967741/ /pubmed/33804527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052396 Text en © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Domaradzki, Jan
The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
title The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
title_full The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
title_fullStr The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
title_short The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review
title_sort werther effect, the papageno effect or no effect? a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33804527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052396
work_keys_str_mv AT domaradzkijan thewerthereffectthepapagenoeffectornoeffectaliteraturereview
AT domaradzkijan werthereffectthepapagenoeffectornoeffectaliteraturereview