Cargando…

Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: To observe the hemostatic effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to examine the risk factors for poor hemostasis. METHODS: Clinical data of 841 patients with CSP who underwent prophylactic UAE and curettage were retrospe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Hongan, Li, Shunzhen, Jia, Wanwan, Yu, Kaihu, Wu, Guangyao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520964379
_version_ 1783665963314446336
author Tian, Hongan
Li, Shunzhen
Jia, Wanwan
Yu, Kaihu
Wu, Guangyao
author_facet Tian, Hongan
Li, Shunzhen
Jia, Wanwan
Yu, Kaihu
Wu, Guangyao
author_sort Tian, Hongan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To observe the hemostatic effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to examine the risk factors for poor hemostasis. METHODS: Clinical data of 841 patients with CSP who underwent prophylactic UAE and curettage were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the hemorrhage volume during curettage. A hemorrhage volume ≥200 mL was termed as poor hemostasis. The risk factors of poor hemostasis were analyzed and complications within 60 days postoperation were recorded. RESULTS: Among the 841 patients, 6.30% (53/841) had poor postoperative hemostasis. The independent risk factors of poor hemostasis were gestational sac size, parity, embolic agent diameter (>1000 μm), multivessel blood supply, and incomplete embolization. The main postoperative complications within 60 days after UAE were abdominal pain, low fever, nausea and vomiting, and buttock pain, with incidence rates of 71.22% (599/841), 47.44% (399/841), 39.12% (329/841), and 36.39% (306/841), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic UAE before curettage in patients with CSP is safe and effective in reducing intraoperative hemorrhage. Gestational sac size, parity, embolic agent diameter, multivessel blood supply, and incomplete embolization of all arteries supplying blood to the uterus are risk factors of poor hemostasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7967858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79678582021-03-31 Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy Tian, Hongan Li, Shunzhen Jia, Wanwan Yu, Kaihu Wu, Guangyao J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To observe the hemostatic effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to examine the risk factors for poor hemostasis. METHODS: Clinical data of 841 patients with CSP who underwent prophylactic UAE and curettage were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the hemorrhage volume during curettage. A hemorrhage volume ≥200 mL was termed as poor hemostasis. The risk factors of poor hemostasis were analyzed and complications within 60 days postoperation were recorded. RESULTS: Among the 841 patients, 6.30% (53/841) had poor postoperative hemostasis. The independent risk factors of poor hemostasis were gestational sac size, parity, embolic agent diameter (>1000 μm), multivessel blood supply, and incomplete embolization. The main postoperative complications within 60 days after UAE were abdominal pain, low fever, nausea and vomiting, and buttock pain, with incidence rates of 71.22% (599/841), 47.44% (399/841), 39.12% (329/841), and 36.39% (306/841), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic UAE before curettage in patients with CSP is safe and effective in reducing intraoperative hemorrhage. Gestational sac size, parity, embolic agent diameter, multivessel blood supply, and incomplete embolization of all arteries supplying blood to the uterus are risk factors of poor hemostasis. SAGE Publications 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7967858/ /pubmed/33467974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520964379 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Tian, Hongan
Li, Shunzhen
Jia, Wanwan
Yu, Kaihu
Wu, Guangyao
Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
title Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
title_full Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
title_fullStr Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
title_short Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
title_sort risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520964379
work_keys_str_mv AT tianhongan riskfactorsforpoorhemostasisofprophylacticuterinearteryembolizationbeforecurettageincesareanscarpregnancy
AT lishunzhen riskfactorsforpoorhemostasisofprophylacticuterinearteryembolizationbeforecurettageincesareanscarpregnancy
AT jiawanwan riskfactorsforpoorhemostasisofprophylacticuterinearteryembolizationbeforecurettageincesareanscarpregnancy
AT yukaihu riskfactorsforpoorhemostasisofprophylacticuterinearteryembolizationbeforecurettageincesareanscarpregnancy
AT wuguangyao riskfactorsforpoorhemostasisofprophylacticuterinearteryembolizationbeforecurettageincesareanscarpregnancy