Cargando…
Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction
BACKGROUND: The strength and size of core muscles, including the abdominal muscles, are crucial to proper function in most activities. Therefore, it is important to reliably assess these characteristics. Our primary objective was to determine if the length, thickness and cross-sectional area of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7968206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04157-0 |
_version_ | 1783666016830619648 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, A. Wayne Adams, Lauren Kho, Jade B. Green, Daniel M. Pace, Nicolas B. Mitchell, Ulrike H. |
author_facet | Johnson, A. Wayne Adams, Lauren Kho, Jade B. Green, Daniel M. Pace, Nicolas B. Mitchell, Ulrike H. |
author_sort | Johnson, A. Wayne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The strength and size of core muscles, including the abdominal muscles, are crucial to proper function in most activities. Therefore, it is important to reliably assess these characteristics. Our primary objective was to determine if the length, thickness and cross-sectional area of the transversus abdominis (TrA) can be visualized independently from the internal and external abdominal oblique muscles using extended field of view ultrasound imaging at rest and with contraction and to establish its intra- and inter-tester reliability. METHODS: Twenty-six individuals were recruited to participate in the study (20 F, 6 M), average age 24.0 years (SD 9.4), height 170.7 cm (SD 8.6) and weight 63.9 kg (SD 9.0). From this total number of participants, two groups of 16 randomly selected participants were assessed to determine intra- and inter-tester reliability respectively. Extended field of view ultrasound images were obtained at three vertebral levels during rest and contraction in the side lying position for both the right and left sides of the trunk. RESULTS: Excellent intra-tester and inter-tester reliability was seen (ICC range of 0.972 to 0.984). The overall average percent standard error of the measurement for all measurements and locations was approximately 4%. The overall average minimal difference for the thickness measurement for the resting and contraction conditions combined were as follows: intratester 0.056 (0.014) cm and intertester 0.054 (0.017) cm, for area intratester 0.287 (0.086) cm(2) and intertester 0.289 (0.101) cm(2) and for length intratester 0.519 (0.097) cm and intertester 0.507 (0.085) cm. CONCLUSIONS: Extended field of view ultrasound imaging is an effective method of reliably capturing clear images of the TrA during rest and contraction. It provides an efficient mechanism for the analysis of muscle morphology by being able to measure the cross-sectional area, thickness, and length on one image. This methodology is recommended for studies investigating TrA function and training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7968206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79682062021-03-22 Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction Johnson, A. Wayne Adams, Lauren Kho, Jade B. Green, Daniel M. Pace, Nicolas B. Mitchell, Ulrike H. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The strength and size of core muscles, including the abdominal muscles, are crucial to proper function in most activities. Therefore, it is important to reliably assess these characteristics. Our primary objective was to determine if the length, thickness and cross-sectional area of the transversus abdominis (TrA) can be visualized independently from the internal and external abdominal oblique muscles using extended field of view ultrasound imaging at rest and with contraction and to establish its intra- and inter-tester reliability. METHODS: Twenty-six individuals were recruited to participate in the study (20 F, 6 M), average age 24.0 years (SD 9.4), height 170.7 cm (SD 8.6) and weight 63.9 kg (SD 9.0). From this total number of participants, two groups of 16 randomly selected participants were assessed to determine intra- and inter-tester reliability respectively. Extended field of view ultrasound images were obtained at three vertebral levels during rest and contraction in the side lying position for both the right and left sides of the trunk. RESULTS: Excellent intra-tester and inter-tester reliability was seen (ICC range of 0.972 to 0.984). The overall average percent standard error of the measurement for all measurements and locations was approximately 4%. The overall average minimal difference for the thickness measurement for the resting and contraction conditions combined were as follows: intratester 0.056 (0.014) cm and intertester 0.054 (0.017) cm, for area intratester 0.287 (0.086) cm(2) and intertester 0.289 (0.101) cm(2) and for length intratester 0.519 (0.097) cm and intertester 0.507 (0.085) cm. CONCLUSIONS: Extended field of view ultrasound imaging is an effective method of reliably capturing clear images of the TrA during rest and contraction. It provides an efficient mechanism for the analysis of muscle morphology by being able to measure the cross-sectional area, thickness, and length on one image. This methodology is recommended for studies investigating TrA function and training. BioMed Central 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7968206/ /pubmed/33731070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04157-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Johnson, A. Wayne Adams, Lauren Kho, Jade B. Green, Daniel M. Pace, Nicolas B. Mitchell, Ulrike H. Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
title | Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
title_full | Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
title_fullStr | Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
title_short | Extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring Transversus Abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
title_sort | extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging is reliable for measuring transversus abdominis muscle size at rest and during contraction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7968206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04157-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonawayne extendedfieldofviewultrasoundimagingisreliableformeasuringtransversusabdominismusclesizeatrestandduringcontraction AT adamslauren extendedfieldofviewultrasoundimagingisreliableformeasuringtransversusabdominismusclesizeatrestandduringcontraction AT khojadeb extendedfieldofviewultrasoundimagingisreliableformeasuringtransversusabdominismusclesizeatrestandduringcontraction AT greendanielm extendedfieldofviewultrasoundimagingisreliableformeasuringtransversusabdominismusclesizeatrestandduringcontraction AT pacenicolasb extendedfieldofviewultrasoundimagingisreliableformeasuringtransversusabdominismusclesizeatrestandduringcontraction AT mitchellulrikeh extendedfieldofviewultrasoundimagingisreliableformeasuringtransversusabdominismusclesizeatrestandduringcontraction |