Cargando…
Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection
BACKGROUND: We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing distress screening (DS) of cancer patients to inform and promote uptake in cancer treatment facilities. We describe the recruitment and data collection challenges and recommendations for assessing DS in oncology treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7968218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5 |
_version_ | 1783666019408019456 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Diane Gallaway, M. Shayne Huang, Grace C. Famolaro, Theresa Boehm, Jennifer Stachon, Karen Rohan, Elizabeth A. |
author_facet | Ng, Diane Gallaway, M. Shayne Huang, Grace C. Famolaro, Theresa Boehm, Jennifer Stachon, Karen Rohan, Elizabeth A. |
author_sort | Ng, Diane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing distress screening (DS) of cancer patients to inform and promote uptake in cancer treatment facilities. We describe the recruitment and data collection challenges and recommendations for assessing DS in oncology treatment facilities. METHODS: We recruited CoC-accredited facilities and collected data from each facility’s electronic health record (EHR). Collected data included cancer diagnosis and demographics, details on DS, and other relevant patient health data. Data were collected by external study staff who were given access to the facility’s EHR system, or by facility staff working locally within their own EHR system. Analyses are based on a pilot study of 9 facilities. RESULTS: Challenges stemmed from being a multi-facility-based study and local institutional review board (IRB) approval, facility review and approval processes, and issues associated with EHR systems and the lack of DS data standards. Facilities that provided study staff remote-access took longer for recruitment; facilities that performed their own extraction/abstraction took longer to complete data collection. CONCLUSION: Examining DS practices and follow-up among cancer survivors necessitated recruiting and working directly with multiple healthcare systems and facilities. There were a number of lessons learned related to recruitment, enrollment, and data collection. Using the facilitators described in this manuscript offers increased potential for working successfully with various cancer centers and insight into partnering with facilities collecting non-standardized DS clinical data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7968218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79682182021-03-22 Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection Ng, Diane Gallaway, M. Shayne Huang, Grace C. Famolaro, Theresa Boehm, Jennifer Stachon, Karen Rohan, Elizabeth A. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing distress screening (DS) of cancer patients to inform and promote uptake in cancer treatment facilities. We describe the recruitment and data collection challenges and recommendations for assessing DS in oncology treatment facilities. METHODS: We recruited CoC-accredited facilities and collected data from each facility’s electronic health record (EHR). Collected data included cancer diagnosis and demographics, details on DS, and other relevant patient health data. Data were collected by external study staff who were given access to the facility’s EHR system, or by facility staff working locally within their own EHR system. Analyses are based on a pilot study of 9 facilities. RESULTS: Challenges stemmed from being a multi-facility-based study and local institutional review board (IRB) approval, facility review and approval processes, and issues associated with EHR systems and the lack of DS data standards. Facilities that provided study staff remote-access took longer for recruitment; facilities that performed their own extraction/abstraction took longer to complete data collection. CONCLUSION: Examining DS practices and follow-up among cancer survivors necessitated recruiting and working directly with multiple healthcare systems and facilities. There were a number of lessons learned related to recruitment, enrollment, and data collection. Using the facilitators described in this manuscript offers increased potential for working successfully with various cancer centers and insight into partnering with facilities collecting non-standardized DS clinical data. BioMed Central 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7968218/ /pubmed/33731095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ng, Diane Gallaway, M. Shayne Huang, Grace C. Famolaro, Theresa Boehm, Jennifer Stachon, Karen Rohan, Elizabeth A. Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
title | Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
title_full | Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
title_fullStr | Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
title_full_unstemmed | Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
title_short | Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
title_sort | partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7968218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngdiane partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection AT gallawaymshayne partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection AT huanggracec partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection AT famolarotheresa partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection AT boehmjennifer partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection AT stachonkaren partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection AT rohanelizabetha partneringwithhealthcarefacilitiestounderstandpsychosocialdistressscreeningpracticesamongcancersurvivorspilotstudyimplicationsforstudydesignrecruitmentanddatacollection |