Cargando…

Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy

BACKGROUND: The antihelminthic drug praziquantel has been used as the drug of choice for treating schistosome infection for more than 40 years. Although some epidemiological studies have reported low praziquantel efficacy in cure rate (CR) and/or egg reduction rate (ERR), there is no consistent robu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukushige, Mizuho, Chase-Topping, Margo, Woolhouse, Mark E. J., Mutapi, Francisca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7968639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33730095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009189
_version_ 1783666103090675712
author Fukushige, Mizuho
Chase-Topping, Margo
Woolhouse, Mark E. J.
Mutapi, Francisca
author_facet Fukushige, Mizuho
Chase-Topping, Margo
Woolhouse, Mark E. J.
Mutapi, Francisca
author_sort Fukushige, Mizuho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The antihelminthic drug praziquantel has been used as the drug of choice for treating schistosome infection for more than 40 years. Although some epidemiological studies have reported low praziquantel efficacy in cure rate (CR) and/or egg reduction rate (ERR), there is no consistent robust evidence of the development of schistosome resistance to praziquantel (PZQ). There is need to determine factors that lead to variable treatment CR and/or ERR. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to review CR and ERR as well as identify their predictors. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a literature review was conducted using Biosis Citation Index, Data Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection all of which were provided through Web of Science. Alongside these, EMBASE, and CAB abstracts were searched to identify relevant articles. Random effect meta-regression models were used to identify the factors that influence CR and/or ERR by considering differences in host characteristics and drug dose. In total, 12,127 potential articles were screened and 146 eligible articles (published from 1979 to 2020) were identified and included for the meta-analysis. We found that there has been no significant reduction in CR or ERR over the study period. The results showed more variability in CR, compared with ERR which was more consistent and remained high. The results showed a positive effect of “PZQ treatment dose” with the current recommended dose of 40 mg/kg body weight achieving 57% to 88% CR depending on schistosome species, age of participants, and number of parasitological samples used for diagnosis, and ERR of 95%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on a review of over 40 years of research there is no evidence to support concerns about schistosomes developing resistance to PZQ. These results indicate that PZQ remains effective in treating schistosomiasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7968639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79686392021-03-31 Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy Fukushige, Mizuho Chase-Topping, Margo Woolhouse, Mark E. J. Mutapi, Francisca PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The antihelminthic drug praziquantel has been used as the drug of choice for treating schistosome infection for more than 40 years. Although some epidemiological studies have reported low praziquantel efficacy in cure rate (CR) and/or egg reduction rate (ERR), there is no consistent robust evidence of the development of schistosome resistance to praziquantel (PZQ). There is need to determine factors that lead to variable treatment CR and/or ERR. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to review CR and ERR as well as identify their predictors. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a literature review was conducted using Biosis Citation Index, Data Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection all of which were provided through Web of Science. Alongside these, EMBASE, and CAB abstracts were searched to identify relevant articles. Random effect meta-regression models were used to identify the factors that influence CR and/or ERR by considering differences in host characteristics and drug dose. In total, 12,127 potential articles were screened and 146 eligible articles (published from 1979 to 2020) were identified and included for the meta-analysis. We found that there has been no significant reduction in CR or ERR over the study period. The results showed more variability in CR, compared with ERR which was more consistent and remained high. The results showed a positive effect of “PZQ treatment dose” with the current recommended dose of 40 mg/kg body weight achieving 57% to 88% CR depending on schistosome species, age of participants, and number of parasitological samples used for diagnosis, and ERR of 95%. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on a review of over 40 years of research there is no evidence to support concerns about schistosomes developing resistance to PZQ. These results indicate that PZQ remains effective in treating schistosomiasis. Public Library of Science 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7968639/ /pubmed/33730095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009189 Text en © 2021 Fukushige et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fukushige, Mizuho
Chase-Topping, Margo
Woolhouse, Mark E. J.
Mutapi, Francisca
Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
title Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
title_full Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
title_fullStr Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
title_short Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
title_sort efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7968639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33730095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009189
work_keys_str_mv AT fukushigemizuho efficacyofpraziquantelhasbeenmaintainedoverfourdecadesfrom1977to2018asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffactorsinfluenceitsefficacy
AT chasetoppingmargo efficacyofpraziquantelhasbeenmaintainedoverfourdecadesfrom1977to2018asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffactorsinfluenceitsefficacy
AT woolhousemarkej efficacyofpraziquantelhasbeenmaintainedoverfourdecadesfrom1977to2018asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffactorsinfluenceitsefficacy
AT mutapifrancisca efficacyofpraziquantelhasbeenmaintainedoverfourdecadesfrom1977to2018asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoffactorsinfluenceitsefficacy