Cargando…

Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients

A neglected Monteggia fracture is defined as the fracture of the proximal ulna associated with radial head dislocation (RHD) without undergoing any treatment for 4 weeks or more after injury. One-stage operation of ulnar corrective osteotomy and open reduction of RHD might result in many complicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jin, Zhao, Xiaolong, Rai, Saroj, Ding, Yuhong, Zhang, Qi, Ze, Renhao, Tang, Xin, Liu, Ruikang, Hong, Pan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025129
_version_ 1783666220115951616
author Li, Jin
Zhao, Xiaolong
Rai, Saroj
Ding, Yuhong
Zhang, Qi
Ze, Renhao
Tang, Xin
Liu, Ruikang
Hong, Pan
author_facet Li, Jin
Zhao, Xiaolong
Rai, Saroj
Ding, Yuhong
Zhang, Qi
Ze, Renhao
Tang, Xin
Liu, Ruikang
Hong, Pan
author_sort Li, Jin
collection PubMed
description A neglected Monteggia fracture is defined as the fracture of the proximal ulna associated with radial head dislocation (RHD) without undergoing any treatment for 4 weeks or more after injury. One-stage operation of ulnar corrective osteotomy and open reduction of RHD might result in many complications. Therefore, a two-stage strategy, including ulnar osteotomy (UO) with or without annular ligament reconstruction (ALR), was adopted at our institute since 2010. We performed a retrospective review of 51 patients with neglected Monteggia fracture between January 2010 and January 2018. Patients with bilateral problems or concomitant injuries in the ipsilateral extremity were excluded. Radiological and clinical data were collected from Hospital Database and clinical visits. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the status of the ALR: the UO alone (UO) group and the ALR group. There were 15 patients in the UO group and 36 patients in the ALR group. The age in the UO group (6.1 ± 2.3, year) was significantly younger than the ALR group (9.8 ± 2.8, year) (P < .001). Concerning the duration from initial injury to surgery, there was a significant difference between the UO group (8.6 ± 3.2 months) and the ALR group (23.3 ± 12.6 months, P < .001). Concerning the preoperative elbow function, there was no significant difference between the UO group (67.6 ± 5.0) and the ALR group (66.6 ± 4.4) according to the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) (P = .51). Concerning the postoperative parameters, including postoperative ROM of the joint, removal of external fixator (6.7 ± 0.8, 6.9 ± 0.9 weeks) (P = .55), lengthening (8.9 ± 2.5, 10.3 ± 2.5 mm) (P = .10) and MEPS (92.7 ± 2.1, 91.6 ± 2.1) (P = .08), there was no significant difference between the UO group and ALR group. Two-stage strategy is a reasonable choice for selected patients with long-lasting RHD with ulnar deformity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79693152021-03-18 Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients Li, Jin Zhao, Xiaolong Rai, Saroj Ding, Yuhong Zhang, Qi Ze, Renhao Tang, Xin Liu, Ruikang Hong, Pan Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 A neglected Monteggia fracture is defined as the fracture of the proximal ulna associated with radial head dislocation (RHD) without undergoing any treatment for 4 weeks or more after injury. One-stage operation of ulnar corrective osteotomy and open reduction of RHD might result in many complications. Therefore, a two-stage strategy, including ulnar osteotomy (UO) with or without annular ligament reconstruction (ALR), was adopted at our institute since 2010. We performed a retrospective review of 51 patients with neglected Monteggia fracture between January 2010 and January 2018. Patients with bilateral problems or concomitant injuries in the ipsilateral extremity were excluded. Radiological and clinical data were collected from Hospital Database and clinical visits. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the status of the ALR: the UO alone (UO) group and the ALR group. There were 15 patients in the UO group and 36 patients in the ALR group. The age in the UO group (6.1 ± 2.3, year) was significantly younger than the ALR group (9.8 ± 2.8, year) (P < .001). Concerning the duration from initial injury to surgery, there was a significant difference between the UO group (8.6 ± 3.2 months) and the ALR group (23.3 ± 12.6 months, P < .001). Concerning the preoperative elbow function, there was no significant difference between the UO group (67.6 ± 5.0) and the ALR group (66.6 ± 4.4) according to the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) (P = .51). Concerning the postoperative parameters, including postoperative ROM of the joint, removal of external fixator (6.7 ± 0.8, 6.9 ± 0.9 weeks) (P = .55), lengthening (8.9 ± 2.5, 10.3 ± 2.5 mm) (P = .10) and MEPS (92.7 ± 2.1, 91.6 ± 2.1) (P = .08), there was no significant difference between the UO group and ALR group. Two-stage strategy is a reasonable choice for selected patients with long-lasting RHD with ulnar deformity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7969315/ /pubmed/33725914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025129 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Li, Jin
Zhao, Xiaolong
Rai, Saroj
Ding, Yuhong
Zhang, Qi
Ze, Renhao
Tang, Xin
Liu, Ruikang
Hong, Pan
Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
title Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
title_full Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
title_fullStr Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
title_full_unstemmed Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
title_short Two-stage strategy for neglected Monteggia fracture in children: A retrospective study of 51 patients
title_sort two-stage strategy for neglected monteggia fracture in children: a retrospective study of 51 patients
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025129
work_keys_str_mv AT lijin twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT zhaoxiaolong twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT raisaroj twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT dingyuhong twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT zhangqi twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT zerenhao twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT tangxin twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT liuruikang twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients
AT hongpan twostagestrategyforneglectedmonteggiafractureinchildrenaretrospectivestudyof51patients