Cargando…
Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness
The primary goal of the peer review of research grant proposals is to evaluate their quality for the funding agency. An important secondary goal is to provide constructive feedback to applicants for their resubmissions. However, little is known about whether review feedback achieves this goal. In th...
Autores principales: | Gallo, Stephen A., Schmaling, Karen B., Thompson, Lisa A., Glisson, Scott R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33733708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00295-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Schmaling, Karen B., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Measuring Community‐Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review
por: LUGER, TANA M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Service Delivery Models to Maximize Quality of Life for Older People at the End of Life: A Rapid Review
por: EVANS, CATHERINE J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)