Cargando…

Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography

The diagnostic value of a visual assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology for grading aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. A visual score (VS) for assessing the AV was developed and its reliability with respect to Doppler measurements and the calcium score (ctCS) derived by multislice computed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nemchyna, Olena, Soltani, Sajjad, Solowjowa, Natalia, Schoenrath, Felix, Hrytsyna, Yuriy, Unbehaun, Axel, Kempfert, Jörg, Stein, Julia, Knosalla, Christoph, Hagendorff, Andreas, Knebel, Fabian, Falk, Volkmar, Knierim, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4
_version_ 1783666249551577088
author Nemchyna, Olena
Soltani, Sajjad
Solowjowa, Natalia
Schoenrath, Felix
Hrytsyna, Yuriy
Unbehaun, Axel
Kempfert, Jörg
Stein, Julia
Knosalla, Christoph
Hagendorff, Andreas
Knebel, Fabian
Falk, Volkmar
Knierim, Jan
author_facet Nemchyna, Olena
Soltani, Sajjad
Solowjowa, Natalia
Schoenrath, Felix
Hrytsyna, Yuriy
Unbehaun, Axel
Kempfert, Jörg
Stein, Julia
Knosalla, Christoph
Hagendorff, Andreas
Knebel, Fabian
Falk, Volkmar
Knierim, Jan
author_sort Nemchyna, Olena
collection PubMed
description The diagnostic value of a visual assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology for grading aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. A visual score (VS) for assessing the AV was developed and its reliability with respect to Doppler measurements and the calcium score (ctCS) derived by multislice computed tomography was evaluated. 99 Patients with AS of various severity and 38 patients without AS were included in the analysis. Echocardiographic studies were evaluated using the new VS which includes echogenicity, thickening, localization of lesions and leaflet mobility, with a total score ranging from 0 to 11. The association of VS with ctCS and the severity of AS was analyzed. There was a significant correlation of VS with AV hemodynamic parameters and with ctCS. The cut-off value for the detection of AS of any grade was a VS of 6 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 85% for women; sensitivity 85%, specificity 88% for men). A VS of 9 for women and of 10 for men was able to predict severe AS with a high specificity (96% in women and 94% in men, AUC 0.8 and 0.86, respectively). The same cut-off values were identified for the detection of ctCS of ≥ 1600 AU and ≥ 3000 AU with a specificity of 77% and 82% (AUC 0.69 and 0.81, respectively). Assessment of aortic valve morphology can serve as an additional diagnostic tool for the detection of AS and an estimation of its severity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79695602021-04-05 Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography Nemchyna, Olena Soltani, Sajjad Solowjowa, Natalia Schoenrath, Felix Hrytsyna, Yuriy Unbehaun, Axel Kempfert, Jörg Stein, Julia Knosalla, Christoph Hagendorff, Andreas Knebel, Fabian Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper The diagnostic value of a visual assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology for grading aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. A visual score (VS) for assessing the AV was developed and its reliability with respect to Doppler measurements and the calcium score (ctCS) derived by multislice computed tomography was evaluated. 99 Patients with AS of various severity and 38 patients without AS were included in the analysis. Echocardiographic studies were evaluated using the new VS which includes echogenicity, thickening, localization of lesions and leaflet mobility, with a total score ranging from 0 to 11. The association of VS with ctCS and the severity of AS was analyzed. There was a significant correlation of VS with AV hemodynamic parameters and with ctCS. The cut-off value for the detection of AS of any grade was a VS of 6 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 85% for women; sensitivity 85%, specificity 88% for men). A VS of 9 for women and of 10 for men was able to predict severe AS with a high specificity (96% in women and 94% in men, AUC 0.8 and 0.86, respectively). The same cut-off values were identified for the detection of ctCS of ≥ 1600 AU and ≥ 3000 AU with a specificity of 77% and 82% (AUC 0.69 and 0.81, respectively). Assessment of aortic valve morphology can serve as an additional diagnostic tool for the detection of AS and an estimation of its severity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-10-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7969560/ /pubmed/33040296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nemchyna, Olena
Soltani, Sajjad
Solowjowa, Natalia
Schoenrath, Felix
Hrytsyna, Yuriy
Unbehaun, Axel
Kempfert, Jörg
Stein, Julia
Knosalla, Christoph
Hagendorff, Andreas
Knebel, Fabian
Falk, Volkmar
Knierim, Jan
Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
title Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
title_full Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
title_fullStr Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
title_short Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
title_sort validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nemchynaolena validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT soltanisajjad validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT solowjowanatalia validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT schoenrathfelix validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT hrytsynayuriy validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT unbehaunaxel validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT kempfertjorg validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT steinjulia validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT knosallachristoph validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT hagendorffandreas validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT knebelfabian validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT falkvolkmar validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography
AT knierimjan validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography