Cargando…
Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography
The diagnostic value of a visual assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology for grading aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. A visual score (VS) for assessing the AV was developed and its reliability with respect to Doppler measurements and the calcium score (ctCS) derived by multislice computed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4 |
_version_ | 1783666249551577088 |
---|---|
author | Nemchyna, Olena Soltani, Sajjad Solowjowa, Natalia Schoenrath, Felix Hrytsyna, Yuriy Unbehaun, Axel Kempfert, Jörg Stein, Julia Knosalla, Christoph Hagendorff, Andreas Knebel, Fabian Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan |
author_facet | Nemchyna, Olena Soltani, Sajjad Solowjowa, Natalia Schoenrath, Felix Hrytsyna, Yuriy Unbehaun, Axel Kempfert, Jörg Stein, Julia Knosalla, Christoph Hagendorff, Andreas Knebel, Fabian Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan |
author_sort | Nemchyna, Olena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnostic value of a visual assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology for grading aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. A visual score (VS) for assessing the AV was developed and its reliability with respect to Doppler measurements and the calcium score (ctCS) derived by multislice computed tomography was evaluated. 99 Patients with AS of various severity and 38 patients without AS were included in the analysis. Echocardiographic studies were evaluated using the new VS which includes echogenicity, thickening, localization of lesions and leaflet mobility, with a total score ranging from 0 to 11. The association of VS with ctCS and the severity of AS was analyzed. There was a significant correlation of VS with AV hemodynamic parameters and with ctCS. The cut-off value for the detection of AS of any grade was a VS of 6 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 85% for women; sensitivity 85%, specificity 88% for men). A VS of 9 for women and of 10 for men was able to predict severe AS with a high specificity (96% in women and 94% in men, AUC 0.8 and 0.86, respectively). The same cut-off values were identified for the detection of ctCS of ≥ 1600 AU and ≥ 3000 AU with a specificity of 77% and 82% (AUC 0.69 and 0.81, respectively). Assessment of aortic valve morphology can serve as an additional diagnostic tool for the detection of AS and an estimation of its severity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7969560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79695602021-04-05 Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography Nemchyna, Olena Soltani, Sajjad Solowjowa, Natalia Schoenrath, Felix Hrytsyna, Yuriy Unbehaun, Axel Kempfert, Jörg Stein, Julia Knosalla, Christoph Hagendorff, Andreas Knebel, Fabian Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper The diagnostic value of a visual assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology for grading aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. A visual score (VS) for assessing the AV was developed and its reliability with respect to Doppler measurements and the calcium score (ctCS) derived by multislice computed tomography was evaluated. 99 Patients with AS of various severity and 38 patients without AS were included in the analysis. Echocardiographic studies were evaluated using the new VS which includes echogenicity, thickening, localization of lesions and leaflet mobility, with a total score ranging from 0 to 11. The association of VS with ctCS and the severity of AS was analyzed. There was a significant correlation of VS with AV hemodynamic parameters and with ctCS. The cut-off value for the detection of AS of any grade was a VS of 6 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 85% for women; sensitivity 85%, specificity 88% for men). A VS of 9 for women and of 10 for men was able to predict severe AS with a high specificity (96% in women and 94% in men, AUC 0.8 and 0.86, respectively). The same cut-off values were identified for the detection of ctCS of ≥ 1600 AU and ≥ 3000 AU with a specificity of 77% and 82% (AUC 0.69 and 0.81, respectively). Assessment of aortic valve morphology can serve as an additional diagnostic tool for the detection of AS and an estimation of its severity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-10-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7969560/ /pubmed/33040296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nemchyna, Olena Soltani, Sajjad Solowjowa, Natalia Schoenrath, Felix Hrytsyna, Yuriy Unbehaun, Axel Kempfert, Jörg Stein, Julia Knosalla, Christoph Hagendorff, Andreas Knebel, Fabian Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
title | Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
title_full | Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
title_short | Validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
title_sort | validity of visual assessment of aortic valve morphology in patients with aortic stenosis using two-dimensional echocardiography |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33040296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02048-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nemchynaolena validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT soltanisajjad validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT solowjowanatalia validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT schoenrathfelix validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT hrytsynayuriy validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT unbehaunaxel validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT kempfertjorg validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT steinjulia validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT knosallachristoph validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT hagendorffandreas validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT knebelfabian validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT falkvolkmar validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography AT knierimjan validityofvisualassessmentofaorticvalvemorphologyinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingtwodimensionalechocardiography |