Cargando…
A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification
BACKGROUND: First tarsometatarsal joint (TMT-1) hypermobility might cause hallux valgus deformity (HV), and recurrence following surgical correction. Anatomic findings, indicating tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) involvement in TMT‑1 stabilization, led to the development of cross-glide test allowing c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01705-x |
_version_ | 1783666251421188096 |
---|---|
author | Ornig, Martin Tschauner, Sebastian Holweg, Patrick Lukas Hohenberger, Gloria Maria Bratschitsch, Gerhard Leithner, Andreas Leitner, Lukas |
author_facet | Ornig, Martin Tschauner, Sebastian Holweg, Patrick Lukas Hohenberger, Gloria Maria Bratschitsch, Gerhard Leithner, Andreas Leitner, Lukas |
author_sort | Ornig, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: First tarsometatarsal joint (TMT-1) hypermobility might cause hallux valgus deformity (HV), and recurrence following surgical correction. Anatomic findings, indicating tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) involvement in TMT‑1 stabilization, led to the development of cross-glide test allowing clinical TMT‑1 stability testing. Cross-glide test function was evaluated in anatomical specimens and in the clinical setting, compared to simulated weight-bearing computer tomography (CT) analysis. METHODS: Cross-glide test was evaluated in 6 healthy lower leg specimens before and after TAT transection. Clinical testing was performed prospectively in 36 feet (6 controls, 21 HV, 9 recurrent HV); consecutive weight-bearing CT analysis was performed. Results from clinical testing were compared to CT analysis. RESULTS: TMT‑1 instability significantly increased in anatomic specimens following TAT transection (p = 0.009). In the clinical setting, all healthy feet were cross-glide test negative, 62% of HV cases and all recurrent HV feet were positive. In the CT analysis- Compared to controls the HV cases revealed significantly increased MT‑1 internal rotation (p = 0.003) and decreased dorsal angle (p = 0.002), considered as collapsing forefoot signs; HV recurrent cases revealed similar results. Positive cross-glide tested cases revealed increased MT‑1 internal rotation values (p < 0.001) and dorsal angle values (p < 0.001) in CT analysis. Strikingly, cross-glide test positive HV cases revealed significantly increased internal TMT‑1 rotation (p = 0.043) in CT analysis, and HV and IMT (intermetatarsal) angle were significantly higher (p = 0.005, p = 0.006). 15 HV recurrence cases, treated with TMT‑1 arthrodesis, revealed no recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cross-glide test allows reliable clinical TMT‑1 instability testing, via TAT tension, and is less laborious than CT analysis. We recommend TMT‑1 arthrodesis in cases with instability in clinical testing, to avoid HV recurrence. VIDEO ONLINE: The online version of this article contains one video. The article and the video are online available (10.1007/s00508-020-01705-x). The video can be found in the article back matter as “Electronic Supplementary Material”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7969572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79695722021-04-05 A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification Ornig, Martin Tschauner, Sebastian Holweg, Patrick Lukas Hohenberger, Gloria Maria Bratschitsch, Gerhard Leithner, Andreas Leitner, Lukas Wien Klin Wochenschr Original Article BACKGROUND: First tarsometatarsal joint (TMT-1) hypermobility might cause hallux valgus deformity (HV), and recurrence following surgical correction. Anatomic findings, indicating tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) involvement in TMT‑1 stabilization, led to the development of cross-glide test allowing clinical TMT‑1 stability testing. Cross-glide test function was evaluated in anatomical specimens and in the clinical setting, compared to simulated weight-bearing computer tomography (CT) analysis. METHODS: Cross-glide test was evaluated in 6 healthy lower leg specimens before and after TAT transection. Clinical testing was performed prospectively in 36 feet (6 controls, 21 HV, 9 recurrent HV); consecutive weight-bearing CT analysis was performed. Results from clinical testing were compared to CT analysis. RESULTS: TMT‑1 instability significantly increased in anatomic specimens following TAT transection (p = 0.009). In the clinical setting, all healthy feet were cross-glide test negative, 62% of HV cases and all recurrent HV feet were positive. In the CT analysis- Compared to controls the HV cases revealed significantly increased MT‑1 internal rotation (p = 0.003) and decreased dorsal angle (p = 0.002), considered as collapsing forefoot signs; HV recurrent cases revealed similar results. Positive cross-glide tested cases revealed increased MT‑1 internal rotation values (p < 0.001) and dorsal angle values (p < 0.001) in CT analysis. Strikingly, cross-glide test positive HV cases revealed significantly increased internal TMT‑1 rotation (p = 0.043) in CT analysis, and HV and IMT (intermetatarsal) angle were significantly higher (p = 0.005, p = 0.006). 15 HV recurrence cases, treated with TMT‑1 arthrodesis, revealed no recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cross-glide test allows reliable clinical TMT‑1 instability testing, via TAT tension, and is less laborious than CT analysis. We recommend TMT‑1 arthrodesis in cases with instability in clinical testing, to avoid HV recurrence. VIDEO ONLINE: The online version of this article contains one video. The article and the video are online available (10.1007/s00508-020-01705-x). The video can be found in the article back matter as “Electronic Supplementary Material”. Springer Vienna 2020-07-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7969572/ /pubmed/32617706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01705-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ornig, Martin Tschauner, Sebastian Holweg, Patrick Lukas Hohenberger, Gloria Maria Bratschitsch, Gerhard Leithner, Andreas Leitner, Lukas A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
title | A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
title_full | A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
title_fullStr | A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
title_short | A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
title_sort | a novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-020-01705-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ornigmartin anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification AT tschaunersebastian anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification AT holwegpatricklukas anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification AT hohenbergergloriamaria anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification AT bratschitschgerhard anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification AT leithnerandreas anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification AT leitnerlukas anovelmethodofclinicalfirsttarsometatarsaljointhypermobilitytestingandradiologicverification |