Cargando…
A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation. Methods: Twelve children (six male...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.583360 |
_version_ | 1783666268349399040 |
---|---|
author | Morales, David L. Herrington, Cynthia Bacha, Emile A. Morell, Victor O. Prodán, Zsolt Mroczek, Tomasz Sivalingam, Sivakumar Cox, Martijn Bennink, Gerardus Asch, Federico M. |
author_facet | Morales, David L. Herrington, Cynthia Bacha, Emile A. Morell, Victor O. Prodán, Zsolt Mroczek, Tomasz Sivalingam, Sivakumar Cox, Martijn Bennink, Gerardus Asch, Federico M. |
author_sort | Morales, David L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation. Methods: Twelve children (six male) median age 5 (2 to 12) years and weight 17 (10 to 43) kg, had implantation of the first XPV valve design (XPV-1, group 1; 16 mm (n = 5), and 18 mm (n = 7). All had had previous surgery. Based on XPV performance at 12 months, the leaflet design was modified and an additional six children (five male) with complex malformations, median age 5 (3 to 9) years, and weight 21 (14 to 29) kg underwent implantation of the new XPV (XPV-2, group 2; 18 mm in all). For both subgroups, the 12 month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared. Results: All patients in both groups have completed 12 months of follow-up. All are in NYHA functional class I. Seventeen of the 18 conduits have shown no evidence of progressive stenosis, dilation or aneurysm formation. Residual gradients of >40 mm Hg were observed in three patients in group 1 due to kinking of the conduit (n = 1), and peripheral stenosis of the branch pulmonary arteries (n = 2). In group 2, one patient developed rapidly progressive stenosis of the proximal conduit anastomosis, requiring conduit replacement. Five patients in group 1 developed severe pulmonary valve regurgitation (PI) due to prolapse of valve leaflet. In contrast, only one patient in group 2 developed more than mild PI at 12 months, which was not related to leaflet prolapse. Conclusions: The XPV, a biorestorative valved conduit, demonstrated promising early clinical outcomes in humans with 17 of 18 patients being free of reintervention at 1 year. Early onset PI seen in the XPV-1 version seems to have been corrected in the XPV-2, which has led to the approval of an FDA clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02700100 and NCT03022708. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7969645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79696452021-03-19 A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials Morales, David L. Herrington, Cynthia Bacha, Emile A. Morell, Victor O. Prodán, Zsolt Mroczek, Tomasz Sivalingam, Sivakumar Cox, Martijn Bennink, Gerardus Asch, Federico M. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation. Methods: Twelve children (six male) median age 5 (2 to 12) years and weight 17 (10 to 43) kg, had implantation of the first XPV valve design (XPV-1, group 1; 16 mm (n = 5), and 18 mm (n = 7). All had had previous surgery. Based on XPV performance at 12 months, the leaflet design was modified and an additional six children (five male) with complex malformations, median age 5 (3 to 9) years, and weight 21 (14 to 29) kg underwent implantation of the new XPV (XPV-2, group 2; 18 mm in all). For both subgroups, the 12 month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared. Results: All patients in both groups have completed 12 months of follow-up. All are in NYHA functional class I. Seventeen of the 18 conduits have shown no evidence of progressive stenosis, dilation or aneurysm formation. Residual gradients of >40 mm Hg were observed in three patients in group 1 due to kinking of the conduit (n = 1), and peripheral stenosis of the branch pulmonary arteries (n = 2). In group 2, one patient developed rapidly progressive stenosis of the proximal conduit anastomosis, requiring conduit replacement. Five patients in group 1 developed severe pulmonary valve regurgitation (PI) due to prolapse of valve leaflet. In contrast, only one patient in group 2 developed more than mild PI at 12 months, which was not related to leaflet prolapse. Conclusions: The XPV, a biorestorative valved conduit, demonstrated promising early clinical outcomes in humans with 17 of 18 patients being free of reintervention at 1 year. Early onset PI seen in the XPV-1 version seems to have been corrected in the XPV-2, which has led to the approval of an FDA clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02700100 and NCT03022708. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7969645/ /pubmed/33748192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.583360 Text en Copyright © 2021 Morales, Herrington, Bacha, Morell, Prodán, Mroczek, Sivalingam, Cox, Bennink and Asch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Morales, David L. Herrington, Cynthia Bacha, Emile A. Morell, Victor O. Prodán, Zsolt Mroczek, Tomasz Sivalingam, Sivakumar Cox, Martijn Bennink, Gerardus Asch, Federico M. A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials |
title | A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials |
title_full | A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials |
title_short | A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials |
title_sort | novel restorative pulmonary valve conduit: early outcomes of two clinical trials |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.583360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moralesdavidl anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT herringtoncynthia anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT bachaemilea anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT morellvictoro anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT prodanzsolt anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT mroczektomasz anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT sivalingamsivakumar anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT coxmartijn anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT benninkgerardus anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT aschfedericom anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT moralesdavidl novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT herringtoncynthia novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT bachaemilea novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT morellvictoro novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT prodanzsolt novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT mroczektomasz novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT sivalingamsivakumar novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT coxmartijn novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT benninkgerardus novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials AT aschfedericom novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials |