Cargando…

A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials

Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation. Methods: Twelve children (six male...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, David L., Herrington, Cynthia, Bacha, Emile A., Morell, Victor O., Prodán, Zsolt, Mroczek, Tomasz, Sivalingam, Sivakumar, Cox, Martijn, Bennink, Gerardus, Asch, Federico M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.583360
_version_ 1783666268349399040
author Morales, David L.
Herrington, Cynthia
Bacha, Emile A.
Morell, Victor O.
Prodán, Zsolt
Mroczek, Tomasz
Sivalingam, Sivakumar
Cox, Martijn
Bennink, Gerardus
Asch, Federico M.
author_facet Morales, David L.
Herrington, Cynthia
Bacha, Emile A.
Morell, Victor O.
Prodán, Zsolt
Mroczek, Tomasz
Sivalingam, Sivakumar
Cox, Martijn
Bennink, Gerardus
Asch, Federico M.
author_sort Morales, David L.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation. Methods: Twelve children (six male) median age 5 (2 to 12) years and weight 17 (10 to 43) kg, had implantation of the first XPV valve design (XPV-1, group 1; 16 mm (n = 5), and 18 mm (n = 7). All had had previous surgery. Based on XPV performance at 12 months, the leaflet design was modified and an additional six children (five male) with complex malformations, median age 5 (3 to 9) years, and weight 21 (14 to 29) kg underwent implantation of the new XPV (XPV-2, group 2; 18 mm in all). For both subgroups, the 12 month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared. Results: All patients in both groups have completed 12 months of follow-up. All are in NYHA functional class I. Seventeen of the 18 conduits have shown no evidence of progressive stenosis, dilation or aneurysm formation. Residual gradients of >40 mm Hg were observed in three patients in group 1 due to kinking of the conduit (n = 1), and peripheral stenosis of the branch pulmonary arteries (n = 2). In group 2, one patient developed rapidly progressive stenosis of the proximal conduit anastomosis, requiring conduit replacement. Five patients in group 1 developed severe pulmonary valve regurgitation (PI) due to prolapse of valve leaflet. In contrast, only one patient in group 2 developed more than mild PI at 12 months, which was not related to leaflet prolapse. Conclusions: The XPV, a biorestorative valved conduit, demonstrated promising early clinical outcomes in humans with 17 of 18 patients being free of reintervention at 1 year. Early onset PI seen in the XPV-1 version seems to have been corrected in the XPV-2, which has led to the approval of an FDA clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02700100 and NCT03022708.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79696452021-03-19 A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials Morales, David L. Herrington, Cynthia Bacha, Emile A. Morell, Victor O. Prodán, Zsolt Mroczek, Tomasz Sivalingam, Sivakumar Cox, Martijn Bennink, Gerardus Asch, Federico M. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Objectives: We report the first use of a biorestorative valved conduit (Xeltis pulmonary valve–XPV) in children. Based on early follow-up data the valve design was modified; we report on the comparative performance of the two designs at 12 months post-implantation. Methods: Twelve children (six male) median age 5 (2 to 12) years and weight 17 (10 to 43) kg, had implantation of the first XPV valve design (XPV-1, group 1; 16 mm (n = 5), and 18 mm (n = 7). All had had previous surgery. Based on XPV performance at 12 months, the leaflet design was modified and an additional six children (five male) with complex malformations, median age 5 (3 to 9) years, and weight 21 (14 to 29) kg underwent implantation of the new XPV (XPV-2, group 2; 18 mm in all). For both subgroups, the 12 month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared. Results: All patients in both groups have completed 12 months of follow-up. All are in NYHA functional class I. Seventeen of the 18 conduits have shown no evidence of progressive stenosis, dilation or aneurysm formation. Residual gradients of >40 mm Hg were observed in three patients in group 1 due to kinking of the conduit (n = 1), and peripheral stenosis of the branch pulmonary arteries (n = 2). In group 2, one patient developed rapidly progressive stenosis of the proximal conduit anastomosis, requiring conduit replacement. Five patients in group 1 developed severe pulmonary valve regurgitation (PI) due to prolapse of valve leaflet. In contrast, only one patient in group 2 developed more than mild PI at 12 months, which was not related to leaflet prolapse. Conclusions: The XPV, a biorestorative valved conduit, demonstrated promising early clinical outcomes in humans with 17 of 18 patients being free of reintervention at 1 year. Early onset PI seen in the XPV-1 version seems to have been corrected in the XPV-2, which has led to the approval of an FDA clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02700100 and NCT03022708. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7969645/ /pubmed/33748192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.583360 Text en Copyright © 2021 Morales, Herrington, Bacha, Morell, Prodán, Mroczek, Sivalingam, Cox, Bennink and Asch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Morales, David L.
Herrington, Cynthia
Bacha, Emile A.
Morell, Victor O.
Prodán, Zsolt
Mroczek, Tomasz
Sivalingam, Sivakumar
Cox, Martijn
Bennink, Gerardus
Asch, Federico M.
A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
title A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
title_full A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
title_fullStr A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
title_short A Novel Restorative Pulmonary Valve Conduit: Early Outcomes of Two Clinical Trials
title_sort novel restorative pulmonary valve conduit: early outcomes of two clinical trials
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.583360
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesdavidl anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT herringtoncynthia anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT bachaemilea anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT morellvictoro anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT prodanzsolt anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT mroczektomasz anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT sivalingamsivakumar anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT coxmartijn anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT benninkgerardus anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT aschfedericom anovelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT moralesdavidl novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT herringtoncynthia novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT bachaemilea novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT morellvictoro novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT prodanzsolt novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT mroczektomasz novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT sivalingamsivakumar novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT coxmartijn novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT benninkgerardus novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials
AT aschfedericom novelrestorativepulmonaryvalveconduitearlyoutcomesoftwoclinicaltrials