Cargando…

Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal

Mechanical ventilation (MV) represents a lifesaving treatment for patients with respiratory failure, but it could be harmful through the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), protective MV strategies with low tidal volume t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanelli, Vito, Costamagna, Andrea, Ranieri, V. Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969728/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-44942-7.00124-2
_version_ 1783666284692504576
author Fanelli, Vito
Costamagna, Andrea
Ranieri, V. Marco
author_facet Fanelli, Vito
Costamagna, Andrea
Ranieri, V. Marco
author_sort Fanelli, Vito
collection PubMed
description Mechanical ventilation (MV) represents a lifesaving treatment for patients with respiratory failure, but it could be harmful through the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), protective MV strategies with low tidal volume to minimize VILI have been demonstrated to reduce lung injury and mortality. However, they can be limited by the emergence of uncontrolled hypercapnia. Similarly, in COPD patients, noninvasive MV failure often is associated with a progressive rise in arterial CO(2) and need for endotracheal intubation, with higher risk of hospital mortality. Minimally invasive extracorporeal CO(2) removal systems (ECCO(2)R) theoretically can remove the entire amount of the CO(2) produced in the body per minute. In ARDS patients, ECCO(2)R may further reduce the risk of VILI ensuring ultraprotective MV and avoiding hypercapnia. In patients with exacerbation of COPD, ECCO(2)R may help to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning from invasive MV. In intensive care unit, concomitant renal and respiratory failure with MV is one of the strongest risk factors for hospital mortality. Combining ECCO(2)R and renal replacement therapy may support respiratory and renal functions and limit the side effects of MV. However, the need for systemic anticoagulation and the related risk of bleeding still represent a concern for a wider application of ECCO(2)R devices. In conclusion, ECCO(2)R is an effective support therapy to MV to limit its invasiveness and side effects, but its efficacy and safety must be proven in well-designed clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79697282021-03-18 Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal Fanelli, Vito Costamagna, Andrea Ranieri, V. Marco Critical Care Nephrology Article Mechanical ventilation (MV) represents a lifesaving treatment for patients with respiratory failure, but it could be harmful through the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), protective MV strategies with low tidal volume to minimize VILI have been demonstrated to reduce lung injury and mortality. However, they can be limited by the emergence of uncontrolled hypercapnia. Similarly, in COPD patients, noninvasive MV failure often is associated with a progressive rise in arterial CO(2) and need for endotracheal intubation, with higher risk of hospital mortality. Minimally invasive extracorporeal CO(2) removal systems (ECCO(2)R) theoretically can remove the entire amount of the CO(2) produced in the body per minute. In ARDS patients, ECCO(2)R may further reduce the risk of VILI ensuring ultraprotective MV and avoiding hypercapnia. In patients with exacerbation of COPD, ECCO(2)R may help to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning from invasive MV. In intensive care unit, concomitant renal and respiratory failure with MV is one of the strongest risk factors for hospital mortality. Combining ECCO(2)R and renal replacement therapy may support respiratory and renal functions and limit the side effects of MV. However, the need for systemic anticoagulation and the related risk of bleeding still represent a concern for a wider application of ECCO(2)R devices. In conclusion, ECCO(2)R is an effective support therapy to MV to limit its invasiveness and side effects, but its efficacy and safety must be proven in well-designed clinical trials. 2019 2018-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7969728/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-44942-7.00124-2 Text en Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Fanelli, Vito
Costamagna, Andrea
Ranieri, V. Marco
Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
title Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
title_full Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
title_fullStr Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
title_short Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
title_sort extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969728/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-44942-7.00124-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fanellivito extracorporealcarbondioxideremoval
AT costamagnaandrea extracorporealcarbondioxideremoval
AT ranierivmarco extracorporealcarbondioxideremoval