Cargando…

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey

OBJECTIVES: Since its emergence in late 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic that has significantly challenged healthcare systems. Healthcare workers have previously been shown to have experienced higher rates of infection than the general population. We aimed to assess the extent of infect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shorten, Robert John, Haslam, Shonagh, Hurley, Margaret A, Rowbottom, Anthony, Myers, M, Wilkinson, Paul, Orr, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045384
_version_ 1783666291522928640
author Shorten, Robert John
Haslam, Shonagh
Hurley, Margaret A
Rowbottom, Anthony
Myers, M
Wilkinson, Paul
Orr, David
author_facet Shorten, Robert John
Haslam, Shonagh
Hurley, Margaret A
Rowbottom, Anthony
Myers, M
Wilkinson, Paul
Orr, David
author_sort Shorten, Robert John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Since its emergence in late 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic that has significantly challenged healthcare systems. Healthcare workers have previously been shown to have experienced higher rates of infection than the general population. We aimed to assess the extent of infection in staff working in our healthcare setting. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of antibody results, compared with staff demographic data, and exposure to patients with COVID-19 infection. SETTING: A large teaching hospital in the North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: 4474 staff in diverse clinical and non-patient facing roles who volunteered for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing by the Roche Elecsys assay between 29 May and 4 July 2020. RESULTS: Seroprevalence was 17.4%. Higher rates were seen in Asian/Asian British (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.04) and Black/Black British (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.45) staff. Staff working in any clinical location were more likely to be seropositive (OR 2.68, 95% 2.27 to 3.15). Staff were at an increased risk of seropositivity as the ‘per 100 COVID-19 bed-days change’ increased in the clinical area in which they worked (OR 1.12, 95% 1.10 to 1.14). Staff working in critical care were no more likely to have detectable antibodies than staff working in non-clinical areas. Symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were reported in 41.8% and antibodies were detected in 30.7% of these individuals. In staff who reported no symptoms, antibodies were detected in 7.7%. In all staff who had detectable antibodies, 25.2% reported no symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Staff working in clinical areas where patients with COVID-19 were nursed were more likely to have detectable antibodies. The relationship between seropositivity in healthcare workers and the increase in ‘per 100 COVID-19 bed-days’ of the area in which they worked, although statistically significant, was weak, suggesting other contributing factors to the risk profile. Of staff with detectable antibodies and therefore evidence of prior infection, a quarter self-reported that they had experienced no compatible symptoms. This has implications for potential unrecorded transmission in both staff and patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79697582021-03-19 Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey Shorten, Robert John Haslam, Shonagh Hurley, Margaret A Rowbottom, Anthony Myers, M Wilkinson, Paul Orr, David BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: Since its emergence in late 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic that has significantly challenged healthcare systems. Healthcare workers have previously been shown to have experienced higher rates of infection than the general population. We aimed to assess the extent of infection in staff working in our healthcare setting. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of antibody results, compared with staff demographic data, and exposure to patients with COVID-19 infection. SETTING: A large teaching hospital in the North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: 4474 staff in diverse clinical and non-patient facing roles who volunteered for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing by the Roche Elecsys assay between 29 May and 4 July 2020. RESULTS: Seroprevalence was 17.4%. Higher rates were seen in Asian/Asian British (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.04) and Black/Black British (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.45) staff. Staff working in any clinical location were more likely to be seropositive (OR 2.68, 95% 2.27 to 3.15). Staff were at an increased risk of seropositivity as the ‘per 100 COVID-19 bed-days change’ increased in the clinical area in which they worked (OR 1.12, 95% 1.10 to 1.14). Staff working in critical care were no more likely to have detectable antibodies than staff working in non-clinical areas. Symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were reported in 41.8% and antibodies were detected in 30.7% of these individuals. In staff who reported no symptoms, antibodies were detected in 7.7%. In all staff who had detectable antibodies, 25.2% reported no symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Staff working in clinical areas where patients with COVID-19 were nursed were more likely to have detectable antibodies. The relationship between seropositivity in healthcare workers and the increase in ‘per 100 COVID-19 bed-days’ of the area in which they worked, although statistically significant, was weak, suggesting other contributing factors to the risk profile. Of staff with detectable antibodies and therefore evidence of prior infection, a quarter self-reported that they had experienced no compatible symptoms. This has implications for potential unrecorded transmission in both staff and patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7969758/ /pubmed/33727275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045384 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Shorten, Robert John
Haslam, Shonagh
Hurley, Margaret A
Rowbottom, Anthony
Myers, M
Wilkinson, Paul
Orr, David
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey
title Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey
title_full Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey
title_fullStr Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey
title_short Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey
title_sort seroprevalence of sars-cov-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the north west of england: a period prevalence survey
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045384
work_keys_str_mv AT shortenrobertjohn seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey
AT haslamshonagh seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey
AT hurleymargareta seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey
AT rowbottomanthony seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey
AT myersm seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey
AT wilkinsonpaul seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey
AT orrdavid seroprevalenceofsarscov2infectioninhealthcareworkersinalargeteachinghospitalinthenorthwestofenglandaperiodprevalencesurvey