Cargando…

Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome

The urinary microbiome has been increasingly characterized using next-generation sequencing. However, many of the technical methods have not yet been specifically optimized for urine. We sought to compare the performance of several DNA isolation kits used in urinary microbiome studies. A total of 11...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karstens, Lisa, Siddiqui, Nazema Y., Zaza, Tamara, Barstad, Alecsander, Amundsen, Cindy L., Sysoeva, Tatyana A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85482-1
_version_ 1783666328430706688
author Karstens, Lisa
Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
Zaza, Tamara
Barstad, Alecsander
Amundsen, Cindy L.
Sysoeva, Tatyana A.
author_facet Karstens, Lisa
Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
Zaza, Tamara
Barstad, Alecsander
Amundsen, Cindy L.
Sysoeva, Tatyana A.
author_sort Karstens, Lisa
collection PubMed
description The urinary microbiome has been increasingly characterized using next-generation sequencing. However, many of the technical methods have not yet been specifically optimized for urine. We sought to compare the performance of several DNA isolation kits used in urinary microbiome studies. A total of 11 voided urine samples and one buffer control were divided into 5 equal aliquots and processed in parallel using five commercial DNA isolation kits. DNA was quantified and the V4 segment of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Data were processed to identify the microbial composition and to assess alpha and beta diversity of the samples. Tested DNA isolation kits result in significantly different DNA yields from urine samples. DNA extracted with the Qiagen Biostic Bacteremia and DNeasy Blood & Tissue kits showed the fewest technical issues in downstream analyses, with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit also demonstrating the highest DNA yield. Nevertheless, all five kits provided good quality DNA for high throughput sequencing with non-significant differences in the number of reads recovered, alpha, or beta diversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79699182021-03-19 Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome Karstens, Lisa Siddiqui, Nazema Y. Zaza, Tamara Barstad, Alecsander Amundsen, Cindy L. Sysoeva, Tatyana A. Sci Rep Article The urinary microbiome has been increasingly characterized using next-generation sequencing. However, many of the technical methods have not yet been specifically optimized for urine. We sought to compare the performance of several DNA isolation kits used in urinary microbiome studies. A total of 11 voided urine samples and one buffer control were divided into 5 equal aliquots and processed in parallel using five commercial DNA isolation kits. DNA was quantified and the V4 segment of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Data were processed to identify the microbial composition and to assess alpha and beta diversity of the samples. Tested DNA isolation kits result in significantly different DNA yields from urine samples. DNA extracted with the Qiagen Biostic Bacteremia and DNeasy Blood & Tissue kits showed the fewest technical issues in downstream analyses, with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit also demonstrating the highest DNA yield. Nevertheless, all five kits provided good quality DNA for high throughput sequencing with non-significant differences in the number of reads recovered, alpha, or beta diversity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7969918/ /pubmed/33731788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85482-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Karstens, Lisa
Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
Zaza, Tamara
Barstad, Alecsander
Amundsen, Cindy L.
Sysoeva, Tatyana A.
Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
title Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
title_full Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
title_fullStr Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
title_short Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
title_sort benchmarking dna isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85482-1
work_keys_str_mv AT karstenslisa benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome
AT siddiquinazemay benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome
AT zazatamara benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome
AT barstadalecsander benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome
AT amundsencindyl benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome
AT sysoevatatyanaa benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome