Cargando…
Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome
The urinary microbiome has been increasingly characterized using next-generation sequencing. However, many of the technical methods have not yet been specifically optimized for urine. We sought to compare the performance of several DNA isolation kits used in urinary microbiome studies. A total of 11...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85482-1 |
_version_ | 1783666328430706688 |
---|---|
author | Karstens, Lisa Siddiqui, Nazema Y. Zaza, Tamara Barstad, Alecsander Amundsen, Cindy L. Sysoeva, Tatyana A. |
author_facet | Karstens, Lisa Siddiqui, Nazema Y. Zaza, Tamara Barstad, Alecsander Amundsen, Cindy L. Sysoeva, Tatyana A. |
author_sort | Karstens, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The urinary microbiome has been increasingly characterized using next-generation sequencing. However, many of the technical methods have not yet been specifically optimized for urine. We sought to compare the performance of several DNA isolation kits used in urinary microbiome studies. A total of 11 voided urine samples and one buffer control were divided into 5 equal aliquots and processed in parallel using five commercial DNA isolation kits. DNA was quantified and the V4 segment of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Data were processed to identify the microbial composition and to assess alpha and beta diversity of the samples. Tested DNA isolation kits result in significantly different DNA yields from urine samples. DNA extracted with the Qiagen Biostic Bacteremia and DNeasy Blood & Tissue kits showed the fewest technical issues in downstream analyses, with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit also demonstrating the highest DNA yield. Nevertheless, all five kits provided good quality DNA for high throughput sequencing with non-significant differences in the number of reads recovered, alpha, or beta diversity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7969918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79699182021-03-19 Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome Karstens, Lisa Siddiqui, Nazema Y. Zaza, Tamara Barstad, Alecsander Amundsen, Cindy L. Sysoeva, Tatyana A. Sci Rep Article The urinary microbiome has been increasingly characterized using next-generation sequencing. However, many of the technical methods have not yet been specifically optimized for urine. We sought to compare the performance of several DNA isolation kits used in urinary microbiome studies. A total of 11 voided urine samples and one buffer control were divided into 5 equal aliquots and processed in parallel using five commercial DNA isolation kits. DNA was quantified and the V4 segment of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Data were processed to identify the microbial composition and to assess alpha and beta diversity of the samples. Tested DNA isolation kits result in significantly different DNA yields from urine samples. DNA extracted with the Qiagen Biostic Bacteremia and DNeasy Blood & Tissue kits showed the fewest technical issues in downstream analyses, with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit also demonstrating the highest DNA yield. Nevertheless, all five kits provided good quality DNA for high throughput sequencing with non-significant differences in the number of reads recovered, alpha, or beta diversity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7969918/ /pubmed/33731788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85482-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Karstens, Lisa Siddiqui, Nazema Y. Zaza, Tamara Barstad, Alecsander Amundsen, Cindy L. Sysoeva, Tatyana A. Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
title | Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
title_full | Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
title_short | Benchmarking DNA isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
title_sort | benchmarking dna isolation kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85482-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karstenslisa benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome AT siddiquinazemay benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome AT zazatamara benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome AT barstadalecsander benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome AT amundsencindyl benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome AT sysoevatatyanaa benchmarkingdnaisolationkitsusedinanalysesoftheurinarymicrobiome |