Cargando…

Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens

In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three commercially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van der Weijden, Fridus, Rijnen, Mirella, Valkenburg, Cees
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85305-3
_version_ 1783666329891373056
author Van der Weijden, Fridus
Rijnen, Mirella
Valkenburg, Cees
author_facet Van der Weijden, Fridus
Rijnen, Mirella
Valkenburg, Cees
author_sort Van der Weijden, Fridus
collection PubMed
description In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three commercially available qPCR kits for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were compared, using 100 clinical samples from patients with untreated periodontitis. The analysis involved two separate comparisons in which kit A (LabOral Diagnostics, The Netherlands) was compared with kit B (Advanced Dental Diagnostics, The Netherlands), and with kit C (OralDent diagnostics, The Netherlands). Analytic procedures for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were carried out according to the instructions of the laboratories. Kit A detected target species more often, and absolute numbers of bacterial cells were higher than with kit B. A high degree of similarity was found between the test outcomes by kit A and kit C. All three kits performed satisfactory but small and significant differences exist between kits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7969924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79699242021-03-19 Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens Van der Weijden, Fridus Rijnen, Mirella Valkenburg, Cees Sci Rep Article In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three commercially available qPCR kits for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were compared, using 100 clinical samples from patients with untreated periodontitis. The analysis involved two separate comparisons in which kit A (LabOral Diagnostics, The Netherlands) was compared with kit B (Advanced Dental Diagnostics, The Netherlands), and with kit C (OralDent diagnostics, The Netherlands). Analytic procedures for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were carried out according to the instructions of the laboratories. Kit A detected target species more often, and absolute numbers of bacterial cells were higher than with kit B. A high degree of similarity was found between the test outcomes by kit A and kit C. All three kits performed satisfactory but small and significant differences exist between kits. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7969924/ /pubmed/33731742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85305-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Van der Weijden, Fridus
Rijnen, Mirella
Valkenburg, Cees
Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_full Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_fullStr Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_short Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
title_sort comparison of three qpcr-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33731742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85305-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderweijdenfridus comparisonofthreeqpcrbasedcommercialtestsfordetectionofperiodontalpathogens
AT rijnenmirella comparisonofthreeqpcrbasedcommercialtestsfordetectionofperiodontalpathogens
AT valkenburgcees comparisonofthreeqpcrbasedcommercialtestsfordetectionofperiodontalpathogens