Cargando…

Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients

OBJECTIVES: Earlier studies have shown how chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have benefitted from paired associative stimulation (PAS), consisting of high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Since high-frequency PNS is poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohjonen, Markus, Savolainen, Sarianna, Arokoski, Jari, Shulga, Anastasia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.01.004
_version_ 1783666349884571648
author Pohjonen, Markus
Savolainen, Sarianna
Arokoski, Jari
Shulga, Anastasia
author_facet Pohjonen, Markus
Savolainen, Sarianna
Arokoski, Jari
Shulga, Anastasia
author_sort Pohjonen, Markus
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Earlier studies have shown how chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have benefitted from paired associative stimulation (PAS), consisting of high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Since high-frequency PNS is poorly characterized, its therapeutic effect without TMS should be evaluated. We tested the effect of PNS combined with motor imagery in chronic SCI patients using the same parameters of PNS as in earlier PAS-based studies that also used TMS. METHODS: Five patients with chronic incomplete SCI and tetraplegia received a 6-week treatment of PNS combined with motor imagery to the weaker upper limb. Patients were evaluated with Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), hand function tests (Box and block, grip and pinch strength dynamometry), and spasticity. RESULTS: There was no significant change in hand function tests or spasticity. MMT values improved significantly immediately after the PNS period (0.59 ± 0.17, p = 0.043) and in the 1-month follow-up visit (0.87 ± 0.18, p = 0.043). However, improvement of MMT values was weaker than in chronic tetraplegic patients in a corresponding PAS study that used identical PNS stimulation but also included the TMS component omitted here (Tolmacheva et al., 2019a, Clin Neurophysiol Pract). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of effect on functional hand tests with the protocol presented here suggests that the synergistic effect of PNS and TMS components is essential for the full therapeutic effect previously observed with PAS intervention. The moderate improvement of the MMT score suggests the possible usefulness of PNS and motor imagery for some of those tetraplegic SCI patients who have contraindications to TMS. SIGNIFICANCE: These results add to the understanding of the PAS therapeutic mechanism by highlighting the importance of dual stimulation for achieving the full therapeutic effect of long-term PAS with a high-frequency PNS component.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7970010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79700102021-03-19 Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients Pohjonen, Markus Savolainen, Sarianna Arokoski, Jari Shulga, Anastasia Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVES: Earlier studies have shown how chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have benefitted from paired associative stimulation (PAS), consisting of high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Since high-frequency PNS is poorly characterized, its therapeutic effect without TMS should be evaluated. We tested the effect of PNS combined with motor imagery in chronic SCI patients using the same parameters of PNS as in earlier PAS-based studies that also used TMS. METHODS: Five patients with chronic incomplete SCI and tetraplegia received a 6-week treatment of PNS combined with motor imagery to the weaker upper limb. Patients were evaluated with Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), hand function tests (Box and block, grip and pinch strength dynamometry), and spasticity. RESULTS: There was no significant change in hand function tests or spasticity. MMT values improved significantly immediately after the PNS period (0.59 ± 0.17, p = 0.043) and in the 1-month follow-up visit (0.87 ± 0.18, p = 0.043). However, improvement of MMT values was weaker than in chronic tetraplegic patients in a corresponding PAS study that used identical PNS stimulation but also included the TMS component omitted here (Tolmacheva et al., 2019a, Clin Neurophysiol Pract). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of effect on functional hand tests with the protocol presented here suggests that the synergistic effect of PNS and TMS components is essential for the full therapeutic effect previously observed with PAS intervention. The moderate improvement of the MMT score suggests the possible usefulness of PNS and motor imagery for some of those tetraplegic SCI patients who have contraindications to TMS. SIGNIFICANCE: These results add to the understanding of the PAS therapeutic mechanism by highlighting the importance of dual stimulation for achieving the full therapeutic effect of long-term PAS with a high-frequency PNS component. Elsevier 2021-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7970010/ /pubmed/33748549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.01.004 Text en © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Pohjonen, Markus
Savolainen, Sarianna
Arokoski, Jari
Shulga, Anastasia
Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients
title Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients
title_full Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients
title_fullStr Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients
title_full_unstemmed Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients
title_short Omitting TMS component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency PNS: A case series of tetraplegic patients
title_sort omitting tms component from paired associative stimulation with high-frequency pns: a case series of tetraplegic patients
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.01.004
work_keys_str_mv AT pohjonenmarkus omittingtmscomponentfrompairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencypnsacaseseriesoftetraplegicpatients
AT savolainensarianna omittingtmscomponentfrompairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencypnsacaseseriesoftetraplegicpatients
AT arokoskijari omittingtmscomponentfrompairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencypnsacaseseriesoftetraplegicpatients
AT shulgaanastasia omittingtmscomponentfrompairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencypnsacaseseriesoftetraplegicpatients