Cargando…

Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for the detection and measurement of cancer. However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in hematological malignancies remains unclear. Materials and methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Xiangyu, Yan, Han, Chen, Lei, Zhang, Yuyang, Sun, Chunyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33747954
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.632910
_version_ 1783666384495968256
author Tan, Xiangyu
Yan, Han
Chen, Lei
Zhang, Yuyang
Sun, Chunyan
author_facet Tan, Xiangyu
Yan, Han
Chen, Lei
Zhang, Yuyang
Sun, Chunyan
author_sort Tan, Xiangyu
collection PubMed
description Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for the detection and measurement of cancer. However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in hematological malignancies remains unclear. Materials and methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relating literature. Diagnostic accuracy variables and disease progression prediction data were pooled by the Meta-Disc version 1.4 software. Review Manager version 5.4 software was applied for prognostic data analysis. Results: A total of 11 studies met our inclusion criteria. In terms of diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.51 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.38–0.64) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.00), respectively. The AUSROC (area under the SROC) curve was 0.89 (95%CI 0.75–1.03). When it comes to the prediction of disease progression, the overall sensitivity and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67–0.94) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93–1.00), respectively. Moreover, a significant association also existed between the presence of ctDNA and worse progression-free survival (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.27–5.43, p = 0.009), as well as overall survival (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.53–5.57, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The use of ctDNA in clinical practice for hematological malignancies is promising, as it may not only contribute to diagnosis, but could also predict the prognosis of patients so as to guide treatment. In the future, more studies are needed to realize the standardization of sequencing techniques and improve the detection sensitivity of exploration methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7970179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79701792021-03-19 Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis Tan, Xiangyu Yan, Han Chen, Lei Zhang, Yuyang Sun, Chunyan Front Oncol Oncology Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for the detection and measurement of cancer. However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in hematological malignancies remains unclear. Materials and methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relating literature. Diagnostic accuracy variables and disease progression prediction data were pooled by the Meta-Disc version 1.4 software. Review Manager version 5.4 software was applied for prognostic data analysis. Results: A total of 11 studies met our inclusion criteria. In terms of diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.51 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.38–0.64) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.00), respectively. The AUSROC (area under the SROC) curve was 0.89 (95%CI 0.75–1.03). When it comes to the prediction of disease progression, the overall sensitivity and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.67–0.94) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93–1.00), respectively. Moreover, a significant association also existed between the presence of ctDNA and worse progression-free survival (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.27–5.43, p = 0.009), as well as overall survival (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.53–5.57, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The use of ctDNA in clinical practice for hematological malignancies is promising, as it may not only contribute to diagnosis, but could also predict the prognosis of patients so as to guide treatment. In the future, more studies are needed to realize the standardization of sequencing techniques and improve the detection sensitivity of exploration methods. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7970179/ /pubmed/33747954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.632910 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tan, Yan, Chen, Zhang and Sun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Tan, Xiangyu
Yan, Han
Chen, Lei
Zhang, Yuyang
Sun, Chunyan
Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Value of ctDNA in Hematological Malignancies (Lymphomas, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Leukemia): A Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical value of ctdna in hematological malignancies (lymphomas, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, and leukemia): a meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33747954
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.632910
work_keys_str_mv AT tanxiangyu clinicalvalueofctdnainhematologicalmalignancieslymphomasmultiplemyelomamyelodysplasticsyndromeandleukemiaametaanalysis
AT yanhan clinicalvalueofctdnainhematologicalmalignancieslymphomasmultiplemyelomamyelodysplasticsyndromeandleukemiaametaanalysis
AT chenlei clinicalvalueofctdnainhematologicalmalignancieslymphomasmultiplemyelomamyelodysplasticsyndromeandleukemiaametaanalysis
AT zhangyuyang clinicalvalueofctdnainhematologicalmalignancieslymphomasmultiplemyelomamyelodysplasticsyndromeandleukemiaametaanalysis
AT sunchunyan clinicalvalueofctdnainhematologicalmalignancieslymphomasmultiplemyelomamyelodysplasticsyndromeandleukemiaametaanalysis