Cargando…

Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation

OBJECTIVE: When a formal review of care takes places after the death of a baby, parents are largely unaware it takes place and are often not meaningfully involved in the review process. Parent engagement in the process is likely to be essential for a successful review and to improve patient safety....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burden, Christy, Bakhbakhi, Danya, Heazell, Alexander Edward, Lynch, Mary, Timlin, Laura, Bevan, Charlotte, Storey, Claire, Kurinczuk, Jennifer J, Siassakos, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044563
_version_ 1783666404391649280
author Burden, Christy
Bakhbakhi, Danya
Heazell, Alexander Edward
Lynch, Mary
Timlin, Laura
Bevan, Charlotte
Storey, Claire
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Siassakos, Dimitrios
author_facet Burden, Christy
Bakhbakhi, Danya
Heazell, Alexander Edward
Lynch, Mary
Timlin, Laura
Bevan, Charlotte
Storey, Claire
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Siassakos, Dimitrios
author_sort Burden, Christy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: When a formal review of care takes places after the death of a baby, parents are largely unaware it takes place and are often not meaningfully involved in the review process. Parent engagement in the process is likely to be essential for a successful review and to improve patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate an intervention process of parental engagement in perinatal mortality review (PNMR) and to identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study of parents’ engagement in PNMR. SETTING: Single tertiary maternity unit in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Bereaved parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs). INTERVENTIONS: Parent engagement in the PNMR (intervention) was based on principles derived through national consensus and qualitative research with parents, HCPs and stakeholders in the UK. OUTCOMES: Recruitment rates, bereaved parents and HCPs’ perceptions. RESULTS: Eighty-one per cent of bereaved parents approached (13/16) agreed to participate in the study. Two focus groups with bereaved parents (n=11) and HCP (n=7) were carried out postimplementation to investigate their perceptions of the process. Overarching findings were improved dialogue and continuity of care with parents, and improvements in the PNMR process and patient safety. Bereaved parents agreed that engagement in the PNMR process was invaluable and helped them in their grieving. HCP perceived that parent involvement improved the review process and lessons learnt from the deaths; information to understand the impact of aspects of care on the baby’s death were often only found in the parents’ recollections. CONCLUSIONS: Parental engagement in the PNMR process is achievable and useful for parents and HCP alike, and critically can improve patient safety and future care for mothers and babies. To learn and prevent perinatal deaths effectively, all hospitals should give parents the option to engage with the review of their baby’s death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7970278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79702782021-04-01 Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation Burden, Christy Bakhbakhi, Danya Heazell, Alexander Edward Lynch, Mary Timlin, Laura Bevan, Charlotte Storey, Claire Kurinczuk, Jennifer J Siassakos, Dimitrios BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: When a formal review of care takes places after the death of a baby, parents are largely unaware it takes place and are often not meaningfully involved in the review process. Parent engagement in the process is likely to be essential for a successful review and to improve patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate an intervention process of parental engagement in perinatal mortality review (PNMR) and to identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study of parents’ engagement in PNMR. SETTING: Single tertiary maternity unit in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Bereaved parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs). INTERVENTIONS: Parent engagement in the PNMR (intervention) was based on principles derived through national consensus and qualitative research with parents, HCPs and stakeholders in the UK. OUTCOMES: Recruitment rates, bereaved parents and HCPs’ perceptions. RESULTS: Eighty-one per cent of bereaved parents approached (13/16) agreed to participate in the study. Two focus groups with bereaved parents (n=11) and HCP (n=7) were carried out postimplementation to investigate their perceptions of the process. Overarching findings were improved dialogue and continuity of care with parents, and improvements in the PNMR process and patient safety. Bereaved parents agreed that engagement in the PNMR process was invaluable and helped them in their grieving. HCP perceived that parent involvement improved the review process and lessons learnt from the deaths; information to understand the impact of aspects of care on the baby’s death were often only found in the parents’ recollections. CONCLUSIONS: Parental engagement in the PNMR process is achievable and useful for parents and HCP alike, and critically can improve patient safety and future care for mothers and babies. To learn and prevent perinatal deaths effectively, all hospitals should give parents the option to engage with the review of their baby’s death. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7970278/ /pubmed/33727271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044563 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Burden, Christy
Bakhbakhi, Danya
Heazell, Alexander Edward
Lynch, Mary
Timlin, Laura
Bevan, Charlotte
Storey, Claire
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Siassakos, Dimitrios
Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
title Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
title_full Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
title_fullStr Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
title_full_unstemmed Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
title_short Parents’ Active Role and ENgagement in The review of their Stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (PARENTS 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
title_sort parents’ active role and engagement in the review of their stillbirth/perinatal death 2 (parents 2) study: a mixed-methods study of implementation
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044563
work_keys_str_mv AT burdenchristy parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT bakhbakhidanya parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT heazellalexanderedward parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT lynchmary parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT timlinlaura parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT bevancharlotte parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT storeyclaire parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT kurinczukjenniferj parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation
AT siassakosdimitrios parentsactiveroleandengagementinthereviewoftheirstillbirthperinataldeath2parents2studyamixedmethodsstudyofimplementation