Cargando…

Notes from the Field: Results from the Parent Acceptance of Pediatric Integrated Care Survey

OBJECTIVE: To collect data and gain an understanding of parental satisfaction with and attitudes toward treatment in a pediatric integrated primary care (IPC) model. DATA SOURCES: Primary data were collected across the United States over the course of a few months. STUDY DESIGN: The 35-item, Parent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruni, Teryn, Birnbaum, Richard, Turnier, Luke, Caserta, Abigail, Maragakis, Alexandros, Tennant, Katherine, Lancaster, Blake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132721990180
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To collect data and gain an understanding of parental satisfaction with and attitudes toward treatment in a pediatric integrated primary care (IPC) model. DATA SOURCES: Primary data were collected across the United States over the course of a few months. STUDY DESIGN: The 35-item, Parent Acceptance of Pediatric Integrated Care Survey (PAPICS) was developed by a panel of IPC experts. The survey was then distributed through the Qualtrics Panels Service with recruited participants (i.e., parents with children under 18-years-old) receiving a $4.00 incentive for their involvement. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: A single exploratory factor analysis was performed along with four factor retention tests and clinical judgment to guide factor selection. A 5-factor structure was selected. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Parents reported a high level of comfort with an IPC model and a favorable attitude toward child therapy, with some concerns regarding psychological stigma and privacy. Notable variation in parents’ beliefs regarding one-on-one psychological service delivery were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results provided evidence for parental openness to an IPC model. Findings also highlighted potential fundamental misunderstandings regarding evidence-based psychological treatment methods for children and adolescents.