Cargando…
Cognitive Focus
Philosophers of mind and language who advance causal theories face a sort of conjunction problem. When we say that the thing had in mind or the thing referred to is a matter of what causally impacted the thinker or speaker, we must somehow narrow down the long conjunction of items in a causal chain,...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00462-4 |
_version_ | 1783666483606323200 |
---|---|
author | Wulfemeyer, Julie |
author_facet | Wulfemeyer, Julie |
author_sort | Wulfemeyer, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Philosophers of mind and language who advance causal theories face a sort of conjunction problem. When we say that the thing had in mind or the thing referred to is a matter of what causally impacted the thinker or speaker, we must somehow narrow down the long conjunction of items in a causal chain, all of which contributed to the having in mind, but only one of which becomes the object of thought or the linguistic referent. Here, I sketch a notion of cognitive focus intended to do this narrowing. The notion borrows three key aspects from visual focus and some technological aides—causation, amplification, and suppression. I suggest a broader application of this framework to address the conjunction problem not only in ordinary contexts of perceptual focus but also in evidence cases involving non-perceptual cognitive focus. I further suggest cognitive focus is helpful in distinguishing referential vs. attributive thought. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7970799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79707992021-03-19 Cognitive Focus Wulfemeyer, Julie Acta Anal Article Philosophers of mind and language who advance causal theories face a sort of conjunction problem. When we say that the thing had in mind or the thing referred to is a matter of what causally impacted the thinker or speaker, we must somehow narrow down the long conjunction of items in a causal chain, all of which contributed to the having in mind, but only one of which becomes the object of thought or the linguistic referent. Here, I sketch a notion of cognitive focus intended to do this narrowing. The notion borrows three key aspects from visual focus and some technological aides—causation, amplification, and suppression. I suggest a broader application of this framework to address the conjunction problem not only in ordinary contexts of perceptual focus but also in evidence cases involving non-perceptual cognitive focus. I further suggest cognitive focus is helpful in distinguishing referential vs. attributive thought. Springer Netherlands 2021-03-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7970799/ /pubmed/33758462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00462-4 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Wulfemeyer, Julie Cognitive Focus |
title | Cognitive Focus |
title_full | Cognitive Focus |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Focus |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Focus |
title_short | Cognitive Focus |
title_sort | cognitive focus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00462-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wulfemeyerjulie cognitivefocus |