Cargando…

Cognitive Focus

Philosophers of mind and language who advance causal theories face a sort of conjunction problem. When we say that the thing had in mind or the thing referred to is a matter of what causally impacted the thinker or speaker, we must somehow narrow down the long conjunction of items in a causal chain,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wulfemeyer, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00462-4
_version_ 1783666483606323200
author Wulfemeyer, Julie
author_facet Wulfemeyer, Julie
author_sort Wulfemeyer, Julie
collection PubMed
description Philosophers of mind and language who advance causal theories face a sort of conjunction problem. When we say that the thing had in mind or the thing referred to is a matter of what causally impacted the thinker or speaker, we must somehow narrow down the long conjunction of items in a causal chain, all of which contributed to the having in mind, but only one of which becomes the object of thought or the linguistic referent. Here, I sketch a notion of cognitive focus intended to do this narrowing. The notion borrows three key aspects from visual focus and some technological aides—causation, amplification, and suppression. I suggest a broader application of this framework to address the conjunction problem not only in ordinary contexts of perceptual focus but also in evidence cases involving non-perceptual cognitive focus. I further suggest cognitive focus is helpful in distinguishing referential vs. attributive thought.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7970799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79707992021-03-19 Cognitive Focus Wulfemeyer, Julie Acta Anal Article Philosophers of mind and language who advance causal theories face a sort of conjunction problem. When we say that the thing had in mind or the thing referred to is a matter of what causally impacted the thinker or speaker, we must somehow narrow down the long conjunction of items in a causal chain, all of which contributed to the having in mind, but only one of which becomes the object of thought or the linguistic referent. Here, I sketch a notion of cognitive focus intended to do this narrowing. The notion borrows three key aspects from visual focus and some technological aides—causation, amplification, and suppression. I suggest a broader application of this framework to address the conjunction problem not only in ordinary contexts of perceptual focus but also in evidence cases involving non-perceptual cognitive focus. I further suggest cognitive focus is helpful in distinguishing referential vs. attributive thought. Springer Netherlands 2021-03-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7970799/ /pubmed/33758462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00462-4 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Wulfemeyer, Julie
Cognitive Focus
title Cognitive Focus
title_full Cognitive Focus
title_fullStr Cognitive Focus
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Focus
title_short Cognitive Focus
title_sort cognitive focus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7970799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00462-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wulfemeyerjulie cognitivefocus