Cargando…

Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain

BACKGROUND: Myofascial release (MFR) and Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) are manual therapy techniques routinely practiced in the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). As a solo intervention or along with other therapies, both methods have reported positive results f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhat P, Vignesh, Patel, Vivek Dineshbhai, Eapen, Charu, Shenoy, Manisha, Milanese, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10706
_version_ 1783666549691777024
author Bhat P, Vignesh
Patel, Vivek Dineshbhai
Eapen, Charu
Shenoy, Manisha
Milanese, Steve
author_facet Bhat P, Vignesh
Patel, Vivek Dineshbhai
Eapen, Charu
Shenoy, Manisha
Milanese, Steve
author_sort Bhat P, Vignesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myofascial release (MFR) and Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) are manual therapy techniques routinely practiced in the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). As a solo intervention or along with other therapies, both methods have reported positive results for individuals with NSLBP. However, which technique improves NSLBP-related pain, restricted range of motion (ROM) and disability, warrants further research. OBJECTIVE: To study the comparative effects of MFR and SNAGs on pain, disability, functional ability, and lumbar ROM in NSLBP. METHOD: A parallel-group study was conducted at tertiary care hospitals. Sixty-five Sub-acute or chronic NSLBP patients were allocated to receive strengthening exercises along with either MFR (n = 33) or SNAGs (n = 32) for six treatment sessions over one week. An independent assessor evaluated outcome measures such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Specific Function Scale (PSFS), and ROM at baseline, immediate (after 1st treatment), and short-term (post-sixth day of the intervention). The Modified Oswestry disability index (MODI) was assessed at baseline and short-term. RESULTS: Within-group analysis found clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.05) changes for VAS and PSFS at immediate and short-term for both the groups. The lumbar extension also showed improvement immediately and in the short-term. Improvement in Lumbar flexion was seen only in the SNAGs group over the short-term. A statistically significant improvement was seen for MODI in both the groups but was not clinically significant in the MFR group. The analysis observed no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the groups at both the immediate and short-term. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and restricted function associated with NSLBP can be improved using SNAGs or MFR, along with strengthening exercises. For limited lumbar flexion ROM, Mulligan SNAGs have a better outcome than MFR over the short-term. Hence, both manual therapy techniques can be incorporated along with exercises for immediate and short-term management of sub-acute to chronic NSLBP. Clinical Trial Registration. CTRI/2018/12/016787 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7971081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79710812021-03-25 Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain Bhat P, Vignesh Patel, Vivek Dineshbhai Eapen, Charu Shenoy, Manisha Milanese, Steve PeerJ Anesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: Myofascial release (MFR) and Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) are manual therapy techniques routinely practiced in the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). As a solo intervention or along with other therapies, both methods have reported positive results for individuals with NSLBP. However, which technique improves NSLBP-related pain, restricted range of motion (ROM) and disability, warrants further research. OBJECTIVE: To study the comparative effects of MFR and SNAGs on pain, disability, functional ability, and lumbar ROM in NSLBP. METHOD: A parallel-group study was conducted at tertiary care hospitals. Sixty-five Sub-acute or chronic NSLBP patients were allocated to receive strengthening exercises along with either MFR (n = 33) or SNAGs (n = 32) for six treatment sessions over one week. An independent assessor evaluated outcome measures such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Specific Function Scale (PSFS), and ROM at baseline, immediate (after 1st treatment), and short-term (post-sixth day of the intervention). The Modified Oswestry disability index (MODI) was assessed at baseline and short-term. RESULTS: Within-group analysis found clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.05) changes for VAS and PSFS at immediate and short-term for both the groups. The lumbar extension also showed improvement immediately and in the short-term. Improvement in Lumbar flexion was seen only in the SNAGs group over the short-term. A statistically significant improvement was seen for MODI in both the groups but was not clinically significant in the MFR group. The analysis observed no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the groups at both the immediate and short-term. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and restricted function associated with NSLBP can be improved using SNAGs or MFR, along with strengthening exercises. For limited lumbar flexion ROM, Mulligan SNAGs have a better outcome than MFR over the short-term. Hence, both manual therapy techniques can be incorporated along with exercises for immediate and short-term management of sub-acute to chronic NSLBP. Clinical Trial Registration. CTRI/2018/12/016787 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/). PeerJ Inc. 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7971081/ /pubmed/33777508 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10706 Text en ©2021 Bhat P et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology and Pain Management
Bhat P, Vignesh
Patel, Vivek Dineshbhai
Eapen, Charu
Shenoy, Manisha
Milanese, Steve
Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
title Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
title_full Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
title_fullStr Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
title_short Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
title_sort myofascial release versus mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides’ immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain
topic Anesthesiology and Pain Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33777508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10706
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatpvignesh myofascialreleaseversusmulligansustainednaturalapophysealglidesimmediateandshorttermeffectsonpainfunctionandmobilityinnonspecificlowbackpain
AT patelvivekdineshbhai myofascialreleaseversusmulligansustainednaturalapophysealglidesimmediateandshorttermeffectsonpainfunctionandmobilityinnonspecificlowbackpain
AT eapencharu myofascialreleaseversusmulligansustainednaturalapophysealglidesimmediateandshorttermeffectsonpainfunctionandmobilityinnonspecificlowbackpain
AT shenoymanisha myofascialreleaseversusmulligansustainednaturalapophysealglidesimmediateandshorttermeffectsonpainfunctionandmobilityinnonspecificlowbackpain
AT milanesesteve myofascialreleaseversusmulligansustainednaturalapophysealglidesimmediateandshorttermeffectsonpainfunctionandmobilityinnonspecificlowbackpain