Cargando…

‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal

BACKGROUND: During their menstrual period, women are generally considered impure in Nepal; in the rural areas of the western part of the country, they are even banished to stay in sheds (called chhaupadi) during this time, which increases their vulnerability to a variety of health consequences. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thapa, Subash, Aro, Arja R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01231-6
_version_ 1783666562379546624
author Thapa, Subash
Aro, Arja R.
author_facet Thapa, Subash
Aro, Arja R.
author_sort Thapa, Subash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During their menstrual period, women are generally considered impure in Nepal; in the rural areas of the western part of the country, they are even banished to stay in sheds (called chhaupadi) during this time, which increases their vulnerability to a variety of health consequences. There is lack of clarity regarding the effectiveness of interventions that have been implemented to address menstrual taboo and improve menstrual hygiene and practices in Nepal (e.g., public awareness, community sensitization and legislation). In this paper, we discuss why menstruation management interventions, particularly those implemented to change the menstrual taboo might not work, and the opinions and experiences regarding the implementation of such interventions. MAIN TEXT: Anecdotal reports from the field and empirical studies suggest that interventions to address menstrual taboos have only been effective for short durations of time due to several reasons. First, local community stakeholders have been reluctant to take actions to abandon retrogressive menstrual practices in rural areas. Second, women who have stopped practising chhaupadi have faced stigma (e.g., fear of exclusion) and discrimination (e.g., blaming, physical and verbal abuse). Third, contextual factors, such as poverty and illiteracy, limit the effectiveness of such interventions. Fourth, community sensitization activities against chhaupadi have faced resistance from community leaders and traditional healers. Fifth, the law prohibiting chhaupadi has also faced implementation problems, including poor filing of complaints. CONCLUSION: Multilevel, multisectoral interventions could be more effective than single-component interventions in breaking the prevailing menstrual taboo and in improving menstrual health and hygiene practices among young girls and women in the rural areas of Nepal. Moreover, interventions that have an active community mobilization component could be effective within local contexts and cultural groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7971149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79711492021-03-19 ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal Thapa, Subash Aro, Arja R. BMC Womens Health Debate BACKGROUND: During their menstrual period, women are generally considered impure in Nepal; in the rural areas of the western part of the country, they are even banished to stay in sheds (called chhaupadi) during this time, which increases their vulnerability to a variety of health consequences. There is lack of clarity regarding the effectiveness of interventions that have been implemented to address menstrual taboo and improve menstrual hygiene and practices in Nepal (e.g., public awareness, community sensitization and legislation). In this paper, we discuss why menstruation management interventions, particularly those implemented to change the menstrual taboo might not work, and the opinions and experiences regarding the implementation of such interventions. MAIN TEXT: Anecdotal reports from the field and empirical studies suggest that interventions to address menstrual taboos have only been effective for short durations of time due to several reasons. First, local community stakeholders have been reluctant to take actions to abandon retrogressive menstrual practices in rural areas. Second, women who have stopped practising chhaupadi have faced stigma (e.g., fear of exclusion) and discrimination (e.g., blaming, physical and verbal abuse). Third, contextual factors, such as poverty and illiteracy, limit the effectiveness of such interventions. Fourth, community sensitization activities against chhaupadi have faced resistance from community leaders and traditional healers. Fifth, the law prohibiting chhaupadi has also faced implementation problems, including poor filing of complaints. CONCLUSION: Multilevel, multisectoral interventions could be more effective than single-component interventions in breaking the prevailing menstrual taboo and in improving menstrual health and hygiene practices among young girls and women in the rural areas of Nepal. Moreover, interventions that have an active community mobilization component could be effective within local contexts and cultural groups. BioMed Central 2021-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7971149/ /pubmed/33639917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01231-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Thapa, Subash
Aro, Arja R.
‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal
title ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal
title_full ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal
title_fullStr ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal
title_short ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal
title_sort ‘menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in nepal
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01231-6
work_keys_str_mv AT thapasubash menstruationmeansimpuritymultilevelinterventionsareneededtobreakthemenstrualtabooinnepal
AT aroarjar menstruationmeansimpuritymultilevelinterventionsareneededtobreakthemenstrualtabooinnepal