Cargando…

Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting

The goal of this study was to determine the impact and experience of radiation oncology (RO) education in the undergraduate medical experience in the USA. A list of American medical schools was complied from various sources including the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and American A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odiase, Otasowie M., Huang, Danning, Sura, Karna T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1899643
_version_ 1783666571488526336
author Odiase, Otasowie M.
Huang, Danning
Sura, Karna T.
author_facet Odiase, Otasowie M.
Huang, Danning
Sura, Karna T.
author_sort Odiase, Otasowie M.
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to determine the impact and experience of radiation oncology (RO) education in the undergraduate medical experience in the USA. A list of American medical schools was complied from various sources including the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) in the summer of 2019. Data was extracted through institution website review, individual phone calls and email distribution. A total of 198 programs (155 allopathic and 43 osteopathic medical schools) were included. Every medical school curriculum had oncology lecture during MS year 1 and 2, although a minimal amount (4%) had a RO-specific lecture during MS year 1 and 2. There were significant differences in the RO education and experience in allopathic (MD) versus osteopathic (DO) programs. Home radiation oncology programs and career advising were associated with a radiation oncology elective during year 3 and 4. Furthermore, RO career advisors and older schools were associated with having one student match into radiation oncology. RO education during the didactic portion of the undergraduate medical experience remains extremely limited. This limitation is even more pronounced in medical schools without RO mentorship and in osteopathic medical schools. This lack of RO exposure perpetuates itself by bringing less students into the field. These issues require attention both on a national and medical-school-specific level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7971218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79712182021-03-31 Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting Odiase, Otasowie M. Huang, Danning Sura, Karna T. Med Educ Online Research Article The goal of this study was to determine the impact and experience of radiation oncology (RO) education in the undergraduate medical experience in the USA. A list of American medical schools was complied from various sources including the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) in the summer of 2019. Data was extracted through institution website review, individual phone calls and email distribution. A total of 198 programs (155 allopathic and 43 osteopathic medical schools) were included. Every medical school curriculum had oncology lecture during MS year 1 and 2, although a minimal amount (4%) had a RO-specific lecture during MS year 1 and 2. There were significant differences in the RO education and experience in allopathic (MD) versus osteopathic (DO) programs. Home radiation oncology programs and career advising were associated with a radiation oncology elective during year 3 and 4. Furthermore, RO career advisors and older schools were associated with having one student match into radiation oncology. RO education during the didactic portion of the undergraduate medical experience remains extremely limited. This limitation is even more pronounced in medical schools without RO mentorship and in osteopathic medical schools. This lack of RO exposure perpetuates itself by bringing less students into the field. These issues require attention both on a national and medical-school-specific level. Taylor & Francis 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7971218/ /pubmed/33720808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1899643 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Odiase, Otasowie M.
Huang, Danning
Sura, Karna T.
Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
title Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
title_full Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
title_fullStr Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
title_full_unstemmed Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
title_short Radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
title_sort radiation oncology education and experience in the undergraduate medical setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7971218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1899643
work_keys_str_mv AT odiaseotasowiem radiationoncologyeducationandexperienceintheundergraduatemedicalsetting
AT huangdanning radiationoncologyeducationandexperienceintheundergraduatemedicalsetting
AT surakarnat radiationoncologyeducationandexperienceintheundergraduatemedicalsetting