Cargando…

Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance

While the quantity of sustainability governance initiatives and systems has increased dramatically, crises persist over whether specific governance systems can be trusted as legitimate regulators of the sustainability of economic activities. This paper focuses on conceptual tools to improve our unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stupak, Inge, Mansoor, Maha, Smith, C. Tattersall
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00280-x
_version_ 1783666674510069760
author Stupak, Inge
Mansoor, Maha
Smith, C. Tattersall
author_facet Stupak, Inge
Mansoor, Maha
Smith, C. Tattersall
author_sort Stupak, Inge
collection PubMed
description While the quantity of sustainability governance initiatives and systems has increased dramatically, crises persist over whether specific governance systems can be trusted as legitimate regulators of the sustainability of economic activities. This paper focuses on conceptual tools to improve our understanding of these crises as well as the facilitating factors and barriers for sustainability governance to play a role in transitioning to profoundly more sustainable societies than those that currently exist. Bioenergy is used throughout the paper as an example to aid contextually in understanding the theoretical and abstract arguments. We first define eight premises upon which our argumentation is developed. We then define sustainability, sustainability transition, legitimacy, and trust as a premise for obtaining effectiveness in communication and minimising risks associated with misunderstanding key terms. We proceed to examine the literature on “good governance” in order to reflect upon what defines "good sustainability governance" and what makes governance systems successful in achieving their goals. We propose input, output, and throughput legitimacy as three principles constituting “good” sustainability governance and propose associated open-ended criteria as a basis for developing operational standards for assessing the quality of a sustainability governance system or complex. As sustainability governance systems must develop to remain relevant, we also suggest an adaptive governance model, where continuous re-evaluation of the sustainability governance system design supports the system in remaining “good” in conditions that are complex and dynamic. Finally, we pull from the literature in a broad range of sciences to propose a conceptual “governance research framework” that aims to facilitate an integrated understanding of how the design of sustainability governance systems influences the legitimacy and trust granted to them by relevant actors. The framework is intended to enhance the adaptive features of sustainability governance systems so as to allow the identification of the causes of existing and emerging sustainability governance crises and finding solutions to them. Knowledge generated from its use may form a basis for providing policy recommendations on how to practically solve complex legitimacy and trust crises related to sustainability governance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13705-021-00280-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7972028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79720282021-03-19 Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance Stupak, Inge Mansoor, Maha Smith, C. Tattersall Energy Sustain Soc Review While the quantity of sustainability governance initiatives and systems has increased dramatically, crises persist over whether specific governance systems can be trusted as legitimate regulators of the sustainability of economic activities. This paper focuses on conceptual tools to improve our understanding of these crises as well as the facilitating factors and barriers for sustainability governance to play a role in transitioning to profoundly more sustainable societies than those that currently exist. Bioenergy is used throughout the paper as an example to aid contextually in understanding the theoretical and abstract arguments. We first define eight premises upon which our argumentation is developed. We then define sustainability, sustainability transition, legitimacy, and trust as a premise for obtaining effectiveness in communication and minimising risks associated with misunderstanding key terms. We proceed to examine the literature on “good governance” in order to reflect upon what defines "good sustainability governance" and what makes governance systems successful in achieving their goals. We propose input, output, and throughput legitimacy as three principles constituting “good” sustainability governance and propose associated open-ended criteria as a basis for developing operational standards for assessing the quality of a sustainability governance system or complex. As sustainability governance systems must develop to remain relevant, we also suggest an adaptive governance model, where continuous re-evaluation of the sustainability governance system design supports the system in remaining “good” in conditions that are complex and dynamic. Finally, we pull from the literature in a broad range of sciences to propose a conceptual “governance research framework” that aims to facilitate an integrated understanding of how the design of sustainability governance systems influences the legitimacy and trust granted to them by relevant actors. The framework is intended to enhance the adaptive features of sustainability governance systems so as to allow the identification of the causes of existing and emerging sustainability governance crises and finding solutions to them. Knowledge generated from its use may form a basis for providing policy recommendations on how to practically solve complex legitimacy and trust crises related to sustainability governance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13705-021-00280-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7972028/ /pubmed/33758740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00280-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Stupak, Inge
Mansoor, Maha
Smith, C. Tattersall
Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
title Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
title_full Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
title_fullStr Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
title_short Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
title_sort conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy and trust of sustainability governance
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33758740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00280-x
work_keys_str_mv AT stupakinge conceptualframeworkforincreasinglegitimacyandtrustofsustainabilitygovernance
AT mansoormaha conceptualframeworkforincreasinglegitimacyandtrustofsustainabilitygovernance
AT smithctattersall conceptualframeworkforincreasinglegitimacyandtrustofsustainabilitygovernance