Cargando…

Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study

BACKGROUND: The dynamics of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are complicated by age-dependent factors, changing levels of infection, and the relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as the perceived risk declines, necessitating the use of mathematical models. Our aims were to use epidemio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Sam, Hill, Edward M, Tildesley, Michael J, Dyson, Louise, Keeling, Matt J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00143-2
_version_ 1783666689811939328
author Moore, Sam
Hill, Edward M
Tildesley, Michael J
Dyson, Louise
Keeling, Matt J
author_facet Moore, Sam
Hill, Edward M
Tildesley, Michael J
Dyson, Louise
Keeling, Matt J
author_sort Moore, Sam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The dynamics of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are complicated by age-dependent factors, changing levels of infection, and the relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as the perceived risk declines, necessitating the use of mathematical models. Our aims were to use epidemiological data from the UK together with estimates of vaccine efficacy to predict the possible long-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 under the planned vaccine rollout. METHODS: In this study, we used a mathematical model structured by age and UK region, fitted to a range of epidemiological data in the UK, which incorporated the planned rollout of a two-dose vaccination programme (doses 12 weeks apart, protection onset 14 days after vaccination). We assumed default vaccine uptake of 95% in those aged 80 years and older, 85% in those aged 50–79 years, and 75% in those aged 18–49 years, and then varied uptake optimistically and pessimistically. Vaccine efficacy against symptomatic disease was assumed to be 88% on the basis of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines being administered in the UK, and protection against infection was varied from 0% to 85%. We considered the combined interaction of the UK vaccination programme with multiple potential future relaxations (or removals) of NPIs, to predict the reproduction number (R) and pattern of daily deaths and hospital admissions due to COVID-19 from January, 2021, to January, 2024. FINDINGS: We estimate that vaccination alone is insufficient to contain the outbreak. In the absence of NPIs, even with our most optimistic assumption that the vaccine will prevent 85% of infections, we estimate R to be 1·58 (95% credible intervals [CI] 1·36–1·84) once all eligible adults have been offered both doses of the vaccine. Under the default uptake scenario, removal of all NPIs once the vaccination programme is complete is predicted to lead to 21 400 deaths (95% CI 1400–55 100) due to COVID-19 for a vaccine that prevents 85% of infections, although this number increases to 96 700 deaths (51 800–173 200) if the vaccine only prevents 60% of infections. Although vaccination substantially reduces total deaths, it only provides partial protection for the individual; we estimate that, for the default uptake scenario and 60% protection against infection, 48·3% (95% CI 48·1–48·5) and 16·0% (15·7–16·3) of deaths will be in individuals who have received one or two doses of the vaccine, respectively. INTERPRETATION: For all vaccination scenarios we investigated, our predictions highlight the risks associated with early or rapid relaxation of NPIs. Although novel vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 offer a potential exit strategy for the pandemic, success is highly contingent on the precise vaccine properties and population uptake, both of which need to be carefully monitored. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, and UK Research and Innovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7972312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79723122021-03-19 Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study Moore, Sam Hill, Edward M Tildesley, Michael J Dyson, Louise Keeling, Matt J Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: The dynamics of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are complicated by age-dependent factors, changing levels of infection, and the relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as the perceived risk declines, necessitating the use of mathematical models. Our aims were to use epidemiological data from the UK together with estimates of vaccine efficacy to predict the possible long-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 under the planned vaccine rollout. METHODS: In this study, we used a mathematical model structured by age and UK region, fitted to a range of epidemiological data in the UK, which incorporated the planned rollout of a two-dose vaccination programme (doses 12 weeks apart, protection onset 14 days after vaccination). We assumed default vaccine uptake of 95% in those aged 80 years and older, 85% in those aged 50–79 years, and 75% in those aged 18–49 years, and then varied uptake optimistically and pessimistically. Vaccine efficacy against symptomatic disease was assumed to be 88% on the basis of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines being administered in the UK, and protection against infection was varied from 0% to 85%. We considered the combined interaction of the UK vaccination programme with multiple potential future relaxations (or removals) of NPIs, to predict the reproduction number (R) and pattern of daily deaths and hospital admissions due to COVID-19 from January, 2021, to January, 2024. FINDINGS: We estimate that vaccination alone is insufficient to contain the outbreak. In the absence of NPIs, even with our most optimistic assumption that the vaccine will prevent 85% of infections, we estimate R to be 1·58 (95% credible intervals [CI] 1·36–1·84) once all eligible adults have been offered both doses of the vaccine. Under the default uptake scenario, removal of all NPIs once the vaccination programme is complete is predicted to lead to 21 400 deaths (95% CI 1400–55 100) due to COVID-19 for a vaccine that prevents 85% of infections, although this number increases to 96 700 deaths (51 800–173 200) if the vaccine only prevents 60% of infections. Although vaccination substantially reduces total deaths, it only provides partial protection for the individual; we estimate that, for the default uptake scenario and 60% protection against infection, 48·3% (95% CI 48·1–48·5) and 16·0% (15·7–16·3) of deaths will be in individuals who have received one or two doses of the vaccine, respectively. INTERPRETATION: For all vaccination scenarios we investigated, our predictions highlight the risks associated with early or rapid relaxation of NPIs. Although novel vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 offer a potential exit strategy for the pandemic, success is highly contingent on the precise vaccine properties and population uptake, both of which need to be carefully monitored. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, and UK Research and Innovation. Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7972312/ /pubmed/33743847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00143-2 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Moore, Sam
Hill, Edward M
Tildesley, Michael J
Dyson, Louise
Keeling, Matt J
Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study
title Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study
title_full Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study
title_fullStr Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study
title_short Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study
title_sort vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for covid-19: a mathematical modelling study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33743847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00143-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mooresam vaccinationandnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19amathematicalmodellingstudy
AT hilledwardm vaccinationandnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19amathematicalmodellingstudy
AT tildesleymichaelj vaccinationandnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19amathematicalmodellingstudy
AT dysonlouise vaccinationandnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19amathematicalmodellingstudy
AT keelingmattj vaccinationandnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19amathematicalmodellingstudy