Cargando…

Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency

BACKGROUND: Congenital limb deficiency is a rare and intractable anomaly of the limbs; however, prostheses can partially complement the motor function and appearance of the missing limbs. The first prosthesis is usually prescribed for children with upper limb deficiencies at approximately 6–8 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mano, Hiroshi, Inakazu, Emi, Noguchi, Satoko, Nishizaka, Chika, Fujiwara, Sayaka, Haga, Nobuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JARM 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768185
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20210016
_version_ 1783666744440651776
author Mano, Hiroshi
Inakazu, Emi
Noguchi, Satoko
Nishizaka, Chika
Fujiwara, Sayaka
Haga, Nobuhiko
author_facet Mano, Hiroshi
Inakazu, Emi
Noguchi, Satoko
Nishizaka, Chika
Fujiwara, Sayaka
Haga, Nobuhiko
author_sort Mano, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Congenital limb deficiency is a rare and intractable anomaly of the limbs; however, prostheses can partially complement the motor function and appearance of the missing limbs. The first prosthesis is usually prescribed for children with upper limb deficiencies at approximately 6–8 months of age. In affected children with additional problems associated with motor function, such as limb paralysis, the age for initiating prosthetic therapy and the benefit of prostheses in promoting and expanding their motor function and activities is unknown. CASE: In this case presentation, we describe a 25-month-old boy with cerebral palsy and left unilateral congenital upper limb deficiency caused by congenital constriction band syndrome. The patient could stand with assistance and crawl on his hands and knees. However, he was unable to walk with assistance or to stand on his own. A forearm prosthesis with a passive hand was prescribed and issued, and rehabilitation therapy for wearing and using the prosthesis was performed. At 34 months of age, the patient was able to walk forward using a walker with the prosthesis. Without the prosthesis, he still could not walk using a walker. The upper limb prosthesis also improved other movements such as sitting, standing, and tasks performed on a desk or on the floor. DISCUSSION: The prosthesis was apparently effective in improving motor function. Prosthesis prescription should be considered at an appropriate and early age considering individual developmental stages and needs, regardless of the existence of additional problems associated with motor function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7972950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JARM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79729502021-03-24 Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency Mano, Hiroshi Inakazu, Emi Noguchi, Satoko Nishizaka, Chika Fujiwara, Sayaka Haga, Nobuhiko Prog Rehabil Med Case Report BACKGROUND: Congenital limb deficiency is a rare and intractable anomaly of the limbs; however, prostheses can partially complement the motor function and appearance of the missing limbs. The first prosthesis is usually prescribed for children with upper limb deficiencies at approximately 6–8 months of age. In affected children with additional problems associated with motor function, such as limb paralysis, the age for initiating prosthetic therapy and the benefit of prostheses in promoting and expanding their motor function and activities is unknown. CASE: In this case presentation, we describe a 25-month-old boy with cerebral palsy and left unilateral congenital upper limb deficiency caused by congenital constriction band syndrome. The patient could stand with assistance and crawl on his hands and knees. However, he was unable to walk with assistance or to stand on his own. A forearm prosthesis with a passive hand was prescribed and issued, and rehabilitation therapy for wearing and using the prosthesis was performed. At 34 months of age, the patient was able to walk forward using a walker with the prosthesis. Without the prosthesis, he still could not walk using a walker. The upper limb prosthesis also improved other movements such as sitting, standing, and tasks performed on a desk or on the floor. DISCUSSION: The prosthesis was apparently effective in improving motor function. Prosthesis prescription should be considered at an appropriate and early age considering individual developmental stages and needs, regardless of the existence of additional problems associated with motor function. JARM 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7972950/ /pubmed/33768185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20210016 Text en ©2021 The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Case Report
Mano, Hiroshi
Inakazu, Emi
Noguchi, Satoko
Nishizaka, Chika
Fujiwara, Sayaka
Haga, Nobuhiko
Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency
title Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency
title_full Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency
title_fullStr Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency
title_short Rehabilitation Approach for a Child with Cerebral Palsy and Upper Limb Deficiency
title_sort rehabilitation approach for a child with cerebral palsy and upper limb deficiency
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768185
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20210016
work_keys_str_mv AT manohiroshi rehabilitationapproachforachildwithcerebralpalsyandupperlimbdeficiency
AT inakazuemi rehabilitationapproachforachildwithcerebralpalsyandupperlimbdeficiency
AT noguchisatoko rehabilitationapproachforachildwithcerebralpalsyandupperlimbdeficiency
AT nishizakachika rehabilitationapproachforachildwithcerebralpalsyandupperlimbdeficiency
AT fujiwarasayaka rehabilitationapproachforachildwithcerebralpalsyandupperlimbdeficiency
AT haganobuhiko rehabilitationapproachforachildwithcerebralpalsyandupperlimbdeficiency