Cargando…
Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients
Desensitization has enabled incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) across HLA/ABO barriers, but added immunomodulation might put patients at increased risk of infections. We studied 475 recipients from our center from 2010 to 2015, categorized by desensitization intensity: none/com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32949093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16316 |
_version_ | 1783666753540194304 |
---|---|
author | Avery, Robin K. Motter, Jennifer D. Jackson, Kyle R. Montgomery, Robert A. Massie, Allan B. Kraus, Edward S. Marr, Kieren A. Lonze, Bonnie E. Alachkar, Nada Holechek, Mary J. Ostrander, Darin Desai, Niraj Waldram, Madeleine M. Shoham, Shmuel Steinke, Seema Mehta Subramanian, Aruna Hiller, Janet M. Langlee, Julie Young, Sheila Segev, Dorry L. Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M. |
author_facet | Avery, Robin K. Motter, Jennifer D. Jackson, Kyle R. Montgomery, Robert A. Massie, Allan B. Kraus, Edward S. Marr, Kieren A. Lonze, Bonnie E. Alachkar, Nada Holechek, Mary J. Ostrander, Darin Desai, Niraj Waldram, Madeleine M. Shoham, Shmuel Steinke, Seema Mehta Subramanian, Aruna Hiller, Janet M. Langlee, Julie Young, Sheila Segev, Dorry L. Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M. |
author_sort | Avery, Robin K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Desensitization has enabled incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) across HLA/ABO barriers, but added immunomodulation might put patients at increased risk of infections. We studied 475 recipients from our center from 2010 to 2015, categorized by desensitization intensity: none/compatible (n = 260), low (0‐4 plasmaphereses, n = 47), moderate (5‐9, n = 74), and high (≥10, n = 94). The 1‐year cumulative incidence of infection was 50.1%, 49.8%, 66.0%, and 73.5% for recipients who received none, low, moderate, and high‐intensity desensitization (P < .001). The most common infections were UTI (33.5% of ILDKT vs. 21.5% compatible), opportunistic (21.9% vs. 10.8%), and bloodstream (19.1% vs. 5.4%) (P < .001). In weighted models, a trend toward increased risk was seen in low (wIRR = (0.77)1.40(2.56),P = .3) and moderately (wIRR = (0.88)1.35(2.06),P = .2) desensitized recipients, with a statistically significant 2.22‐fold (wIRR = (1.33)2.22(3.72),P = .002) increased risk in highly desensitized recipients. Recipients with ≥4 infections were at higher risk of prolonged hospitalization (wIRR = (2.62)3.57(4.88), P < .001) and death‐censored graft loss (wHR = (1.15)4.01(13.95),P = .03). Post–KT infections are more common in desensitized ILDKT recipients. A subset of highly desensitized patients is at ultra‐high risk for infections. Strategies should be designed to protect patients from the morbidity of recurrent infections, and to extend the survival benefit of ILDKT across the spectrum of recipients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7972996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79729962021-04-19 Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients Avery, Robin K. Motter, Jennifer D. Jackson, Kyle R. Montgomery, Robert A. Massie, Allan B. Kraus, Edward S. Marr, Kieren A. Lonze, Bonnie E. Alachkar, Nada Holechek, Mary J. Ostrander, Darin Desai, Niraj Waldram, Madeleine M. Shoham, Shmuel Steinke, Seema Mehta Subramanian, Aruna Hiller, Janet M. Langlee, Julie Young, Sheila Segev, Dorry L. Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M. Am J Transplant ORIGINAL ARTICLES Desensitization has enabled incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) across HLA/ABO barriers, but added immunomodulation might put patients at increased risk of infections. We studied 475 recipients from our center from 2010 to 2015, categorized by desensitization intensity: none/compatible (n = 260), low (0‐4 plasmaphereses, n = 47), moderate (5‐9, n = 74), and high (≥10, n = 94). The 1‐year cumulative incidence of infection was 50.1%, 49.8%, 66.0%, and 73.5% for recipients who received none, low, moderate, and high‐intensity desensitization (P < .001). The most common infections were UTI (33.5% of ILDKT vs. 21.5% compatible), opportunistic (21.9% vs. 10.8%), and bloodstream (19.1% vs. 5.4%) (P < .001). In weighted models, a trend toward increased risk was seen in low (wIRR = (0.77)1.40(2.56),P = .3) and moderately (wIRR = (0.88)1.35(2.06),P = .2) desensitized recipients, with a statistically significant 2.22‐fold (wIRR = (1.33)2.22(3.72),P = .002) increased risk in highly desensitized recipients. Recipients with ≥4 infections were at higher risk of prolonged hospitalization (wIRR = (2.62)3.57(4.88), P < .001) and death‐censored graft loss (wHR = (1.15)4.01(13.95),P = .03). Post–KT infections are more common in desensitized ILDKT recipients. A subset of highly desensitized patients is at ultra‐high risk for infections. Strategies should be designed to protect patients from the morbidity of recurrent infections, and to extend the survival benefit of ILDKT across the spectrum of recipients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-25 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7972996/ /pubmed/32949093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16316 Text en © 2020 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Avery, Robin K. Motter, Jennifer D. Jackson, Kyle R. Montgomery, Robert A. Massie, Allan B. Kraus, Edward S. Marr, Kieren A. Lonze, Bonnie E. Alachkar, Nada Holechek, Mary J. Ostrander, Darin Desai, Niraj Waldram, Madeleine M. Shoham, Shmuel Steinke, Seema Mehta Subramanian, Aruna Hiller, Janet M. Langlee, Julie Young, Sheila Segev, Dorry L. Garonzik Wang, Jacqueline M. Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
title | Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
title_full | Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
title_fullStr | Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
title_short | Quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
title_sort | quantifying infection risks in incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32949093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT averyrobink quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT motterjenniferd quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT jacksonkyler quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT montgomeryroberta quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT massieallanb quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT krausedwards quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT marrkierena quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT lonzebonniee quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT alachkarnada quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT holechekmaryj quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT ostranderdarin quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT desainiraj quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT waldrammadeleinem quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT shohamshmuel quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT steinkeseemamehta quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT subramanianaruna quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT hillerjanetm quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT langleejulie quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT youngsheila quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT segevdorryl quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients AT garonzikwangjacquelinem quantifyinginfectionrisksinincompatiblelivingdonorkidneytransplantrecipients |